We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi there,
There is a bug regarding anonymous variables. Considering the program
a(X) :- b(X, _). b(x, y). b(z, w).
This internally translates to
_xclingo_sup(1,a(X),(b(X,_),)):-[#inc_base];_xclingo_model(b(X,_)).
which is then annotated by clingo as
_xclingo_sup(1,a(X),(b(X,#Anon0),)):-[#inc_base];_xclingo_model(b(X,#Anon1)).
, making #Anon0 unsafe. However, naming this variable (e.g. a(X) :- b(X, Y).) does not raise this error.
#Anon0
a(X) :- b(X, Y).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi there,
There is a bug regarding anonymous variables.
Considering the program
This internally translates to
which is then annotated by clingo as
, making
#Anon0
unsafe.However, naming this variable (e.g.
a(X) :- b(X, Y).
) does not raise this error.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: