We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gtsam/python/gtsam/tests/test_Pose3SLAMExample.py: Is it something wrong wit the the definition of covariance (line 33):
gtsam/python/gtsam/tests/test_Pose3SLAMExample.py
covariance = gtsam.noiseModel.Diagonal.Sigmas(np.array([0.05, 0.05, 0.05, np.deg2rad(5.), np.deg2rad(5.), np.deg2rad(5.)]))
According to the definition of noisemodel for Pose3, the correct definition should be
covariance = gtsam.noiseModel.Diagonal.Sigmas(np.array([roll_std, pitch_std, yaw_std, tx_std, ty_std, tz_std]))
i.e.,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @gogojjh. Did you mean the noise model should instead be the below?
covariance = gtsam.noiseModel.Diagonal.Sigmas(np.array([np.deg2rad(5.), np.deg2rad(5.), np.deg2rad(5.), 0.05, 0.05, 0.05]))
I believe you are correct since the Logmap(Pose3) returns [rot, trans]. Would you like to create a PR for this and I can review and merge it?
Logmap(Pose3)
[rot, trans]
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sure
No branches or pull requests
Description
gtsam/python/gtsam/tests/test_Pose3SLAMExample.py
: Is it something wrong wit the the definition of covariance (line 33):According to the definition of noisemodel for Pose3, the correct definition should be
i.e.,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: