You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current image does not support the case where an Postgres operator takes care of creating the database, manages extensions, and handles users/role permissions. This is somewhat similar to #52036.
In the end I would like to avoid leveraging the Postgres super admin permissions--allowing this to live in a multi-tenant postgres cluster.
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
A parameter to assume SuperAdmin permissions are not needed and that the database/extensions/permissions have already been configured.
What alternatives have you considered?
Creating a dedicated Postgres cluster dedicated to Discourse usage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This Issue has been automatically marked as "stale" because it has not had recent activity (for 15 days). It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thanks for the feedback.
Name and Version
bitnami/discourse:3.3.2-debian-12-r3
What is the problem this feature will solve?
The current image does not support the case where an Postgres operator takes care of creating the database, manages extensions, and handles users/role permissions. This is somewhat similar to #52036.
In the end I would like to avoid leveraging the Postgres super admin permissions--allowing this to live in a multi-tenant postgres cluster.
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
A parameter to assume SuperAdmin permissions are not needed and that the database/extensions/permissions have already been configured.
What alternatives have you considered?
Creating a dedicated Postgres cluster dedicated to Discourse usage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: