Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmark with a good dataset for absolute intensity quantification #42

Open
Tracked by #38
ypriverol opened this issue Jan 12, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
Tracked by #38
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@ypriverol
Copy link
Member

ypriverol commented Jan 12, 2024

We should reanalyze some good datasets for absolute intensity base quantification datasets where the expression/concentrations are known to benchmark the package and the algorithms behind.

@daichengxin @WangHong007 can you let me know a dataset that we can use to benchmark IBAQ methods.

@ypriverol ypriverol added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jan 12, 2024
@ypriverol
Copy link
Member Author

Potential datasets:

@WangHong007
Copy link
Contributor

@ypriverol PXD014765 and PXD012836 link to the same thesis, and I've completed anontation of the former, please check it, especially the bio_replicate column. For the later, it's similar to the former and it included three organisms of yeast, but I found limited experimental design info in PRIDE record and no sign in the thesis. Should we guess it?

@ypriverol
Copy link
Member Author

@daichengxin can you help here?

@daichengxin
Copy link
Collaborator

daichengxin commented Jan 26, 2024

You can see the informations in Supplementary file. Combined mode of samples: standard (T2), high temperature (T3), osmotic shock (T4), low pH (T5), anaerobic (T6) and three (biological) replicates for each condition (A, B, C). Plus 6 bulk samples (Bulk, A-F)

@WangHong007
Copy link
Contributor

WangHong007 commented Jan 26, 2024

@daichengxin Yes but this is experimental info of PXD014765, I don't know how to generate SDRF of PXD012836 since they both linked to the same thesis.

But I can infer that from the author's naming conventions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants