Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ASA: Replace vector processing with raster processing #4357

Open
3 tasks
brettedw opened this issue Mar 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks

ASA: Replace vector processing with raster processing #4357

brettedw opened this issue Mar 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
4Refinement this ticket is ready for refinement with the team Task Technical task that cannot be written as a user story

Comments

@brettedw
Copy link
Collaborator

brettedw commented Mar 20, 2025

Describe the task
There are a couple places in processing SFMS data where there is polygonizing and vector processing happening. We could drastically speed up SFMS calculations by replacing these processes with raster only processing (masking). We would need the convert fire zone units to rasters and use those as mask to pull information from SFMS rasters.
The result would be significantly faster processing, at the expense of some precision.

Acceptance Criteria

  • HighHFI is calculated with raster masking
    • Likely no longer need advisory_classified_hfi table
  • TPI?
  • Fuel grid - combustible area?

Additional context

  • Are there other methods worth exploring that assign partial pixels to zones? Zonal statistics?
@brettedw brettedw added Task Technical task that cannot be written as a user story 4Refinement this ticket is ready for refinement with the team labels Mar 20, 2025
@conbrad conbrad assigned conbrad and unassigned conbrad Apr 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
4Refinement this ticket is ready for refinement with the team Task Technical task that cannot be written as a user story
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants