You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to add 'federated usernames'. Currently, each actor has an address. But sharing addresses may seem a bit cumbersome, or scary to non-technical users.
The way I see his happening is that a domain name can have a seperate record that gives you an IP address for the node that exposes the usernames it supports. And then the protocol of stonenet can be expanded to include a request that resolves a username to an actor address, and optionally to a node address.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I want to add 'federated usernames'. Currently, each actor has an address. But sharing addresses may seem a bit cumbersome, or scary to non-technical users.
The way I see his happening is that a domain name can have a seperate record that gives you an IP address for the node that exposes the usernames it supports. And then the protocol of stonenet can be expanded to include a request that resolves a username to an actor address, and optionally to a node address.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: