Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added error to sentry scope #2381

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

Added error to sentry scope #2381

merged 3 commits into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

Omri-Levy
Copy link
Contributor

@Omri-Levy Omri-Levy commented May 15, 2024

User description

  • fix(workflows-service): added context for errors in sentry
  • fix(workflows-service): added sentry error scope to captureException

Description

Elaborate on the subject, motivation, and context.

Related issues

  • Provide a link to each related issue.

Breaking changes

  • Describe the breaking changes that this pull request introduces.

How these changes were tested

  • Describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes, including devices, operating systems, browsers and versions.

Examples and references

  • Links, screenshots, and other resources related to this change.

Checklist

  • [] I have read the contribution guidelines of this project
  • [] I have read the style guidelines of this project
  • [] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • [] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [] My changes generate no new warnings and errors
  • [] New and existing tests pass locally with my changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error reporting to include additional data for better debugging and issue resolution.

PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Enhanced the Sentry error handling in the captureException method by including additional error details to improve debugging and issue resolution.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
sentry.service.ts
Enhance Sentry Error Reporting with Additional Data           

services/workflows-service/src/sentry/sentry.service.ts

  • Added extra error data to the Sentry scope in the captureException
    method.
  • +2/-0     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link

    changeset-bot bot commented May 15, 2024

    ⚠️ No Changeset found

    Latest commit: 689fdc1

    Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

    This PR includes no changesets

    When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

    Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

    Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

    Copy link
    Contributor

    coderabbitai bot commented May 15, 2024

    Walkthrough

    The SentryService class in the workflows-service has been updated to enhance error reporting. Specifically, the captureException method now includes functionality to set extra data for errors before invoking other internal methods. This improvement aims to provide more contextual information when capturing exceptions, aiding in better debugging and monitoring.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    services/workflows-service/src/sentry/sentry.service.ts Modified the captureException method in the SentryService class to set extra data for errors before calling other internal methods.

    Poem

    In the code where errors roam,
    Sentry now makes data known,
    With extra bits to guide the way,
    Debugging woes kept well at bay.
    🐇✨ The rabbit hops with cheer,
    For clearer logs are finally here!


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share
    Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
      • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

    CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Description updated to latest commit (689fdc1)

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the PR involves a small change in a single file and the change is straightforward. The added lines are simple and the context of the change is well explained in the PR description.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    ⚡ Possible issues

    Type Mismatch: The scope.setExtra('error', error); might cause issues if error is not always an object that can be serialized properly by Sentry. If error can be a string, this might not provide the expected structured data in Sentry.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Code feedback:
    relevant fileservices/workflows-service/src/sentry/sentry.service.ts
    suggestion      

    Consider checking the type of error before setting it as extra data in Sentry. This ensures that the data is always in a consistent format which is easier to debug. You might use a conditional check or a formatting function to standardize the error information. [important]

    relevant linescope.setExtra('error', error);

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Enhancement
    Add type checking for the error parameter to enhance error data structure in Sentry

    Consider checking the type of the error before setting it as an extra in the Sentry scope.
    If error is a string, directly setting it might not provide the structured data Sentry can
    utilize for better error tracking. Instead, you could check if error is an instance of
    Error and handle it accordingly.

    services/workflows-service/src/sentry/sentry.service.ts [12]

    -scope.setExtra('error', error);
    +if (error instanceof Error) {
    +  scope.setExtra('error', { message: error.message, stack: error.stack });
    +} else {
    +  scope.setExtra('error', { message: error });
    +}
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an improvement in error handling by structuring the error data based on its type before sending it to Sentry, which can significantly enhance error tracking and debugging capabilities.

    8

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 0

    Review Details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL

    Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d05d51 and 689fdc1.
    Files selected for processing (1)
    • services/workflows-service/src/sentry/sentry.service.ts (1 hunks)
    Additional comments not posted (2)
    services/workflows-service/src/sentry/sentry.service.ts (2)

    12-13: Add error context to Sentry scope.

    The addition of scope.setExtra('error', error); provides valuable context for errors captured by Sentry. This is a good enhancement for debugging purposes.


    Line range hint 22-22: Add error context to Sentry scope.

    The inclusion of scope.setExtra('error', error); in the captureHttpException method is consistent with the changes in captureException and enhances error context.

    @liorzam liorzam merged commit fdcc030 into dev May 15, 2024
    10 checks passed
    @liorzam liorzam deleted the omri-levy/fix/sentry-errors branch May 15, 2024 08:42
    @Omri-Levy Omri-Levy mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2024
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants