-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The test accuracy is lower than README.md mentioned #74
Comments
I test Syndata.pth on ICDAR13 test set, and the score is lower than README.md mentioned I tried to train Syndata.pth and tested it on ICDAR13 test set, the result is {"precision": 0.6335740072202166, "recall": 0.6410958904109589, "hmean": 0.6373127553336361, "AP": 0} PS, one epoch's log with 10 validation outputs is as follows: 2021/08/16 01:22:16 - main - INFO - 370 - rrc_evaluation_funcs - {"precision": 0.5422477440525021, "recall": 0.6036529680365297, "hmean": 0.571305099394987, "AP": 0} |
Hi, I think this is not authors' fault. I use pretrained model provided by authors on Synthtext and continue training on icidar2015. I get
|
thank you very much for replying! |
Can you show me the Line in code where "new gaussian map method" is used? I just run official training code 'trainic15data.py' without any change. So, emm, maybe I use the option if they set it as default. |
hi, could you teach me how evaluate my model, i'm so noob and can't understand the eval/script.py. thank u very very much! |
Thanks for reimplementation.
I use the release weights to run the model, but the test results are lower than README.md mentioned.
text_threshold=0.7 low_text=0.4 link_threshold=0.4
Syndata+IC13+IC17 test on icdar2013: "precision": 0.8733264675592173, "recall": 0.7744292237442922, "hmean": 0.8209099709583736
Syndata+IC15 test on icdar2015: "precision": 0.8037280701754386, "recall": 0.705825710158883, "hmean": 0.7516021532940271
Is there something wrong with the weights?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: