Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Add multiple sources to Auto Wallpaper #154

Open
joniturmendi opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

[Feature Request] Add multiple sources to Auto Wallpaper #154

joniturmendi opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@joniturmendi
Copy link

Right now, Auto Wallpaper only lets you specify a single source for the pictures. But let's say that I would like my feed of auto wallpapers to consist of a combination of two (or more) independent search terms, or a search term plus a collection, or any combination of the actual available options. That would be a great feature!

Thank you in advance.

@joniturmendi joniturmendi changed the title [Feature Request] Add multiple sources to AutoWallpaper [Feature Request] Add multiple sources to Auto Wallpaper Aug 9, 2022
@realmenwearpink2
Copy link

This seems to be somewhat implemented: I can specify as many collections or search terms as I want.
However, I cannot choose to pull from collections AND multiple search terms. That would be nice

@joniturmendi
Copy link
Author

@realmenwearpink2 Yes, you can specify as many search terms as you want, but I suppose that the search result would be pictures that satisfy all of the specified terms at once, and not one by one. For example: if I write "car" and "cat" in search terms, I guess I would get pictures with cars AND cats in them, but not pictures of just cars and just cats. My point is that it would be nice to be able to provide independent search terms that would result in a combined feed of pictures.

@realmenwearpink2
Copy link

I'm pretty sure you can separate search terms with a comma, and it will search those terms independently.
Have you tried that?

@joniturmendi
Copy link
Author

You are right, that works! I was separating the terms by spaces 😅 anyway, the other feature we mentioned about combining different source types would be great

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants