-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comparision to Vector (https://vector.dev/) #59
Comments
Hi ! |
You are right that vector has more output modules, and if you need ES in flowgger it would need to be added, which is not currently planned. Flowgger is smaller than vector and has a less code. It allows compiling only the required input/output in order to minimize space and memory footprint (although to be fair i don't know if vector allows that as well now), as well as required dependencies. Using a recently added passthrough options allows getting data from different sources, e.g. using different versions of RFC3164 for instance, or add a custom timestamp to the output file, features that we need. In addition, at the time we started to work with flowgger, vector was only in alpha while flowgger was in use for much longer with a better history record regarding stability. Keep in mind that I only looked at vector a year ago when it was still in alpha, so a lot might have changed since then. |
Thank you very much. |
There is also the http://tremor.rs/ project in our cozy ecosystem Hi @Licenser! |
Seems you have similarities with https://vector.dev/. Both are written in Rust. Do you know this project?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: