-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
id field is not of type string for model instead of ID #3044
Comments
Hey @djom202, Thanks for raising this. Could you provide some additional details about the specific change made to the schema that resulted in this error? |
Hi @AnilMaktala, the point is that I didn't change anything. I pushed some new changes when I got the error message. After that, I rolled back those changes, but the error message didn't disappear. Since it doesn't seem to be related to the changes, I believe it could be a new check in the CLI. |
Hi @djom202, It seems like you pushed some changes, then you see the following error. After rolling back those changes, the following error still persist, is that correct? If so, could you share with us what's the changes that make the error first appear so we could have a bit more context?
|
Yeah sure, I changed this: type Vehicle @model @auth(rules: [{ allow: public }]) {
id: ID!
model_year: String!
....
} by this: type Vehicle @model @auth(rules: [{ allow: public }]) {
id: ID!
modelYear: String!
....
} |
This error seems to come from part of the validation for
|
I am working to repro this issue, could you share with us which CLI version you were using when your schema was deployed successfully 30 days ago? |
This is the Schema. And also I'm not sure if I can get the version I'm using in these moment however let me check. |
I noticed that
After setting |
Ok it make senses. however I change the plate for ID I'm not sure if still can use the same values there, so what I'd like to know if it's possible to any KEY to be unique the PLATE field instead of primary key? |
Sorry I am not sure I am following. Are you asking if it's possible to enforce uniqueness on a field like |
Yes |
Unfortunately, we do not have any directive that enforces uniqueness at this moment. |
This issue is now closed. Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see. |
Reopen this issue and mark it as a FR and also duplicate for enforcing uniqueness on non-primary key field. |
How did you install the Amplify CLI?
npm
If applicable, what version of Node.js are you using?
v20.12.0
Amplify CLI Version
12.13.1
What operating system are you using?
Mac
Did you make any manual changes to the cloud resources managed by Amplify? Please describe the changes made.
No
Describe the bug
My schema has at least 30 days deployed without changes, today I going to change something however when I pushed the changes I got this issue:
Schema line before the change:
So I revert the change in my Schema but I'm still getting the same issue, after that I decided to change the type of the
geofenceVehicleId
for String, therefor I got the next error message:My Schema in this moment:
I tried to change
ID
forString
type and I can pushed the changes in a No-Prod environment and however I got this warning message:for that reason I cannot push the changes into my prod environment and I had to rollback all changes, and I still not have idea the reason why I got this error message.
I also want to highlight that this is the only one that gives me this error, while the other relationships are the same but do not have this particular issue.
Expected behavior
From my perspective, the schema should work as it did initially since I haven’t changed anything. However, I understand that a CLI update might have introduced changes, causing a new error like this. Ideally, the CLI should indicate what exactly I need to modify in my schema, specifying the exact line. Currently, it only mentions the attribute, and since I have many attributes with the same name, it’s difficult to pinpoint where the issue lies.
Reproduction steps
I suppose that the steps are related to the way how I setup the schema.
Project Identifier
Project Identifier: fb5b99268af59802a9999a876ab703cd
Log output
Additional information
No response
Before submitting, please confirm:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: