-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
academics&theory_Architects-as-Spatial-Agents-of-Digital-Urbanism.html
318 lines (306 loc) · 25.7 KB
/
academics&theory_Architects-as-Spatial-Agents-of-Digital-Urbanism.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<!-- Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics -->
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-166090330-1"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag() { dataLayer.push(arguments); }
gtag('js', new Date());
gtag('config', 'UA-166090330-1');
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Atelier Even | Academics & Theory</title>
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="img/favicon_io/android-chrome-192x192.png" sizes="192x192">
<link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="img/favicon_io/apple-touch-icon.png">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/styles.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/article.css">
</head>
<body>
<header class="navbar" id="navbar"></header>
<div class="row">
<img class="pagetitle" src="img/Academics&Theory.png" alt="Academics&Theory">
<br>
<div class="mainheadline" style="line-height: 1.2;">Architects as Spatial Agents of Digital Urbanism – between Large Digital Corporations,
Governing Institutions and Urban Society</div>
<div class="subtitle uppercase my-2">Author: Orly Even</div>
<div class="subtitle" class="my-2">Proposed Research</div>
</div>
<section class="project-nav pb-2"></section>
<div class="row">
<div class="imageinrow">
<img name="img" class="imageinrow" data-modal="modal1"
src="img/Academics&Theory/1024px-Amazon_Spheres_01.jpg">
<img class=magnifying src="img/magnifying-glass-white1.svg">
</div>
<div id="modal1" class="modal">
<span class="close">⨯</span>
<img class="modal-content">
</div>
<div class="imagecredit">Figure#1: Amazon Spheres from the Seventh Avenue side, Seattle, Washington, U.S, 2018
[Joe Mabel, <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0" style="display: inline-block;">CC BY-SA
4.0</a>, via Wikimedia Commons]</div>
<div class="subtitle">Abstract:</div>
<div class="abstract">
<p>A proposal for a research project that would set forth an agenda for a politically progressive geography
of architecture. The project would explore the role of architects as urban planners and designers, in
promoting and producing urban intervention by large digital corporations. Its theoretical approach would
be based on post-politics and on the concept of the sublime object and its ideological implications.</p>
</div>
<br>
<div class="article">
<p style="text-indent: 0;"><span class="drop-cap">I</span>n early February Amazon unveiled renderings for
its Arlington headquarters campus HQ2. The design icon of the campus, planned by Seattle based
architecture firm NBBJ, is a spiraling 106-meter-tall building named “The Helix”. Media discourse over
the design has presented concepts of sustainability, wellbeing and biophilia, promoted by both project
architects and Amazon (Harrouk, 2021; Kunkle, 2021; Palmer, 2019; Schoettler, 2019, 2021). Architecture
critics, on the other hand, have rather dismissed the design, referring to the building as an
architectural “duck”<a href="#fn1" class="endnote">[1]</a> whose form represents its purpose (Kennicott,
2021), and bluntly comparing it to an unflattering emoji (Ravenscroft, 2021). This discussion seems to
be missing a more pressing issue than merely aesthetic appreciation: the HQ2 project brings into
question the role of architects as urban planners and designers, in promoting and producing urban
intervention by large digital corporations (LDCs).</p>
<p class="article-sub">Academic Context</p>
<p>
This proposed project wishes to follow the research direction of the DIGI-GOV research project and the
research outcomes of DIG-URBGOV (Carr & Hesse, 2019) in order to explore procedures of urban development
lead by LDCs, and also draw attention to the architectural artifacts they produce. Conceptually, the
research would base itself on prior theorization of post-politics and the split between politics and the
political (Carr & Hesse, 2020; MacLeod, 2011), and would address the “introduction of aesthetics into
political life”(Benjamin, 1969, p. 241) via theories of ethics and aesthetics. As post-politics relates
to Lacanian concepts (Wilson & Swyngedouw, 2014), the research would suggest to incorporate Lacan’s
concept of sublime object (2013) as developed by Žižek (1989), to explore ideological articulation of
urban digital space.
</p>
<p>
The Helix, as well as Amazon’s HQ1 Spheres in Seattle (designed by NBBG and Site Workshop), showcase
technological innovation, extensive use of flora and futuristic morphology. The symbolic architectural
expression embodies a notion of the smart city – a vague model with troubling implications (Carr, 2018;
Kitchin, 2016; Shelton et al., 2015), alluding to the technological sublime (Jameson, 1991; Miller,
1965; Nye, 1994). The objects chosen to represent what is beyond representation – digital practices and
data - become alluring (evoking aw) yet intimidating (losing personal autonomy), and hence sublime. The
sublime object possesses “a massive, oppressive material presence”, compensating for a structural lack
within the social order (Žižek, 1989, p. 184). The function of buildings like The Helix or urban designs
like HQ1+2 is to integrate their users into the new symbolic order created by LDCs, via a
socio-ideological fantasy of a homogeneous, digitally governed society - while such society does not
exist (yet?).
</p>
<p>
Recognizing architecture as a key component in the fabrication of urban space, the proposed research
aims to examine architectural practices in the political context of digital urbanism. Architecture’s
role in the social production of built environments has been probed by geographers, sociologists,
anthropologists and architecture historians (Faulconbridge, 2009; Gottdiener, 1985; Harvey, 1989; Imrie
& Street, 2009; Knox, 1987; Lefèbvre, 1991, 2000; Mcneill, 2006, 2008; Porphyrios, 1985; Tafuri, 1980;
Tafuri & Dal Co, 1986). The social function of architecture is to insert the agents of aesthetic culture
into activities that promote or subvert the dominant production relations (Dickens, 1980, 1981).
According to Bevir & Rhodes (2006), situated agents of institutional governance responding to novel
ideas, can bring about changes in tradition and practices. This could also be applied to lower level
actors in the governance game. Awan et al. (2011) introduce the idea of spatial agency, situating
architectural practices in relation to wider publics and politics than a particular client. The proposed
research would examine how architects engage in post-politics as mediators between LDCs, urban
institutions and the public, and also as agents of urban change, amidst the novel process of urban
digitalization.
</p>
<p class="article-sub">Research Objectives and Expected Contribution to the Field</p>
<p>
The two main objectives of the research would be: a) exploring urban and architectural planning
initiated by LDCs as a mode of post-political social production; b) examining the role of designated
architects as situated spatial agents in this mode of production. Relying on previous research on
Toronto’s waterfront project as precedence, the research would encompass three spatial modes of planning
in four cities:
</p>
<p>1. New urban fabrics in current urban context in Seattle and Arlington / Amazon.</p>
<p>2. Local interventions (particularly architectural) within existing urban fabric in Seattle and Arlington
/ Amazon.</p>
<p>3. New infrastructure and data-centre design in countryside environments in Bissen and Eemshaven /
Google.</p>
<p>
As these are ongoing cases where LDCs have secured a position in the local urban field, the research
would follow plans, discourse and political procedures for dissemination of urban intervention. It would
focus on architects/architecture firms as part of new digital institutions, and city appointed planners
as part of old urban governance. Architectural outputs would be considered in a broad view of social
practice.
</p>
<p>
Since LDC’s entrance to the domain of urban planning is an ongoing phenomenon, research of this sort is
bound to lag behind the changes in urban governance and form of the smart city. Perhaps critical
approaches would not suffice, rather one should try to conceptualize future methods of digital urbanism
as a productive and beneficial mode of LDC involvement in urban practice. One hypothesized direction
might be a rhizomatic approach (Deleuze & Guattari, 1988; Menatti, 2013) of network distribution within
the city, to allow adopting smart city practices and distribution of governance in favor of local
communities and municipal services.<a href="#fn2" class="endnote">[2]</a>
</p>
<p>
In the past two decades there has been renewed interest in architecture among cultural geographers
(Jacobs, 2006; Kraftl, 2010; Lees & Baxter, 2011; Lorne, 2017). In line with this approach, the proposed
urban research puts together critical geography and architecture, by introducing ideas of spatial
agency. Its aim is to develop a politically progressive framework, which could perhaps challenge
conventions in spatial studies and cross disciplinary boundaries. This research could contribute to the
geographies of architecture scholarship, and its results would be published in scientific journal
articles and presented in conference papers. If successful, it might also step out of the academic realm
and offer implementable models for digital urbanization processes.
</p>
<p class="article-sub">Methodology</p>
<p>
The research would employ a qualitative methodology common in human geography and urban studies,
incorporating several approaches to enable a top-down perspective with a street-level view of social
practice:
</p>
<p>1. Interpretative institutionalism: exploring “ways in which social practices are created, sustained and
transformed through […] human activity” (Bevir & Rhodes, 2006, p. 3). The interpretation would include
various techniques based on Krueger et al. (2018) – observation, surveys of planning sites, interviews
with architects and city planners, official and unofficial documents such as architectural
representations.</p>
<p>2. Processuality of urbanization: understanding and analyzing urban politics and political processes by
identifying different discourses (Carr & Hesse, 2020; Kenis, 2019). This would include the ways in which
new urban planning and architecture are mediated to local institutions and communities, review of
discourse of the planning architects and discourse in authoritative architectural magazines.</p>
<p>3. Urban comparison: exploratory mapping, visual documentation and comparative synchronic analysis of
studied cities and spatial modes. This would be accompanied with historic diachronic analysis, to
reconstruct the urbanization processes (Lefèbvre, 1991; Robinson, 2011; Schmid et al., 2018).</p>
</div>
<div class="subtitle">Notes:</div>
<div class="imagecredit">
<p><a name="fn1" class="endnote">[1]</a> A term coined by Venturi and Scott Brown in their study of Las
Vegas. See: Venturi, R., Scott Brown, D., & Izenour, S. (1977). <span
style="font-style: italic;">Learning from Las Vegas: The forgotten symbolism of architectural form.
</span>Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press</p>
<p><a name="fn2" class="endnote">[2]</a> Applicable to the specified spatial modes 1 and 2.</p>
</div>
<br>
<div class="subtitle">Bibliography:</div>
<div class="imagecredit">
<p>Awan, N., Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2011). <span style="font-style: italic;">Spatial agency: Other ways
of doing architecture.
</span>Routledge.</p>
<p>Benjamin, W. (1969/1935). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.),
<span style="font-style: italic;">Illuminations </span>(pp. 217–251). Schocken Books.
</p>
<p>Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. (2006). <span style="font-style: italic;">Governance Stories. </span>(pp.
217–251)Routledge.</p>
<p>Carr, C. (2018, August 9). Wagering the Waterfront ? Angling the abc & xyz of Quayside Toronto. <span
style="font-style: italic;">Urbanization Unbound.</span></p>
<p>Carr, C., & Hesse, M. (2020). When alphabet Inc. plans Toronto’s waterfront: New post-political modes of
Urban governance. <span style="font-style: italic;">Urban Planning, </span>5(1), 69–83. <a
class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.17645/UP.V5I1.2519">https://doi.org/10.17645/UP.V5I1.2519</a></p>
<p>Carr, C., & Hesse, P. M. (2019). <span style="font-style: italic;">Digital Urbanism and the Challenge of
Urban Governance ( DIG _ URBGOV ) – Short Research Summary. </span><a class="endnote"
href="https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/39673">https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/39673</a></p>
<p>Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). <span style="font-style: italic;">A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and
Schizophrenia. </span>Athlone Press.</p>
<p>Dickens, P. G. (1980). Social science and design theory. <span style="font-style: italic;">Environment
and Planning B, 7, </span>353–360.</p>
<p>Dickens, P. G. (1981). The hut and the machine: towards a social theory of architecture. <span
style="font-style: italic;">Architectural Design, 51, </span>111–123.</p>
<p>Faulconbridge, J. R. (2009). The Regulation of Design in Global Architecture Firms : Embedding and
Emplacing Buildings. <span style="font-style: italic;">Urban Studies, 46</span>(12), 2537–2554. <a
class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344227">https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344227</a></p>
<p>Gottdiener, M. (1985). <span style="font-style: italic;">The Social Production of Urban Space.
</span>University of Texas Press.</p>
<p>Harrouk, C. (2021, February 4). <span style="font-style: italic;">BBJ Designs Amazon’s Nature-Infused
Second Headquarters in Virginia. </span>ArchDaily. <a class="endnote"
href="https://www.archdaily.com/956244/nbbj-designs-amazons-nature-infused-second-headquarters-in-virginia">https://www.archdaily.com/956244/nbbj-designs-amazons-nature-infused-second-headquarters-in-virginia</a>
</p>
<p>Harvey, D. (1989). <span style="font-style: italic;">The Urban Experience. </span>Johns Hopkins
University Press.</p>
<p>Imrie, R., & Street, E. (2009). Regulating Design : The Practices of Architecture, Governance and
Control. <span style="font-style: italic;">Urban Studies, 46</span>(12), 2507–2518. <a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009346068">https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009346068</a></p>
<p>Jacobs, J. M. (2006). A geography of big things. <span style="font-style: italic;">Jacobs, J. M. (2006).
A geography of big things. Cultural Geographies, 13, </span>1–27.</p>
<p>Jameson, F. (1991). <i>Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. </i>Duke University
Press.</p>
<p>Kenis, A. (2019). Post-politics contested : Why multiple voices on climate change do not equal
politicisation. <i>Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37</i>(5), 831–848. <a
class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18807209">https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18807209</a></p>
<p>Kennicott, P. (2021, February 18). The Helix is a distraction. Amazon’s new headquarters will change more
than just its Arlington neighborhood. <i>The Washington Post. </i><a class="endnote"
href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/museums/amazon-new-headquarters-the-helix/2021/02/17/36968326-6d75-11eb-ba56-d7e2c8defa31_story.html">https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/museums/amazon-new-headquarters-the-helix/2021/02/17/36968326-6d75-11eb-ba56-d7e2c8defa31_story.html</a>
</p>
<p>Kitchin, R. (2016). Making sense of smart cities : Addressing present shortcomings. <i>Cambridge Journal
of Regions Economy and Society, 8</i>(1), 131–136. <a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027">https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027</a></p>
<p>https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027Knox, P. L. (1987). The social production of the built environment:
architects, architecture and the post-Modern city. <i>Progress in Human Geography, 11, </i>354–378.</p>
<p>Kraftl, P. (2010). Geographies of architecture: The multiple lives of buildings. <i>Geography Compass, 4,
</i>402–415.</p>
<p>Krueger, R., Gibbs, D., & Carr, C. (2018). Examining regional competitiveness and the pressures of rapid
growth : An interpretive institutionalist account of policy responses in three city regions.
<i>Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36</i>(6), 965–986. <a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418767661">https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418767661</a>
</p>
<p>Kunkle, F. (2021, February 2). Amazon unveils Helix building as heart of campus in Arlington. <i>The
Washington Post. </i><a class="endnote"
href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/02/02/amazon-arlingon-headquarters-helix/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/02/02/amazon-arlingon-headquarters-helix/</a>
</p>
<p>Lacan, J. (2013). <i>The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-1960: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan </i>(J.-A.
Miller (Ed.)). Routledge.</p>
<p>Lees, L., & Baxter, R. (2011). A ‘ building event ’ of fear : thinking through the geography of
architecture. <i>Social & Cultural Geography, 12, </i>107–122. </i><a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.545138">https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.545138</a>
</p>
<p>Lefèbvre, H. (1991/1974). <i>The Production of Space. </i>Blackwell Publishers.</p>
<p>Lefèbvre, H. (2000/1968). The Right to the City. In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Eds.), <i>Writings on cities.
</i>Blackwell Publishers.</p>
<p>Lorne, C. (2017). Spatial agency and practising architecture beyond buildings. <i>Social and Cultural
Geography, 18</i>(2), 268–287.<a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1174282">https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1174282</a>
</p>
<p>MacLeod, G. (2011). Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to post-democratic city? <i>Urban
Studies, 48</i>(12), 2629–2660. <a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011415715">https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011415715</a></p>
<p>Mcneill, D. (2006). Globalization and the ethics of architectural design. <i>City, 10</i>(1), 49–58. <a
class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600594639">https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600594639</a></p>
<p>Menatti, L. (2013). A Rhizome of Landscapes : a geophilosophical perspective about contemporary global
spaces. In C. Newman, Y. Nussaume, & B. Pedroli (Eds.),<i> Landscape and Imagination. Towards a new
baseline for Education in a Changing World.</i></p>
<p>Miller, P. (1965). <i>The Life of the Mind in America: From the Revolution to the Civil War.</i>Harcourt,
Brace and World.</p>
<p>Nye, D. E. (1994). <i>American Technological Sublime. </i>MIT Press.</p>
<p>Palmer, A. (2019, December 31). Amazon will break ground on HQ2 soon — here’s what it will look like.
<i>CNBC. </i><a class="endnote"
href="https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/31/amazon-hq2-renderings-released.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/31/amazon-hq2-renderings-released.html</a>
</p>
<p>Porphyrios, D. (1985). On Critical History. In J. Ockman (Ed.), <i>Architecture, Criticism, Ideology
</i>(pp. 16–21). Princeton Architectural Press.</p>
<p>Ravenscroft, T. (2021, February 3). Spiralling glass Amazon HQ2 building “inspired by the poop emoji” say
Twitter users. <i>Dezeen. </i><a class="endnote"
href="https://www.dezeen.com/2021/02/03/amazon-hq2-poop-emoji-nbbj/">https://www.dezeen.com/2021/02/03/amazon-hq2-poop-emoji-nbbj/</a>
</p>
<p>Robinson, J. (2011). Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture. <i>nternational Journal of
Urban and Regional Research, 35</i>1), 1–23. <a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x</a>
</p>
<p>Schmid, C., Karaman, O., Hanakata, N. C., Kallenberger, P., Kockelkorn, A., Sawyer, L., Streule, M., &
Wong, K. P. (2018). Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach. In
<i>Urban Studies </i>(Vol. 55, Issue 1). <a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017739750">https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017739750</a>
</p>
<p>Schoettler, J. (2019). <i>From the ground up. </i>Amazon. <a class="endnote"
href="https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/job-creation-and-investment/from-the-ground-up?utm_medium=website&utm_source=archdaily.com">https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/job-creation-and-investment/from-the-ground-up?utm_medium=website&utm_source=archdaily.com</a>
</p>
<p>Schoettler, J. (2021). <i>he next chapter for HQ2: sustainable buildings surrounded by nature.
</i>Amazon. <a class="endnote"
href="https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/amazon-offices/the-next-chapter-for-hq2-sustainable-buildings-surrounded-by-nature">https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/amazon-offices/the-next-chapter-for-hq2-sustainable-buildings-surrounded-by-nature</a>
</p>
<p>Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The “actually existing smart city.” <i>ambridge Journal of
Regions, Economy and Society, 8</i>(1), 13–25. <a class="endnote"
href="https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026">https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026</a></p>
<p>Tafuri, M. (1980). <i>Theories and history of architecture. </i>Harper & Row.</p>
<p>Tafuri, M., & Dal Co, F. (1986). <i>Modern Architecture. </i>Faber and Faber.</p>
<p>Wilson, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (Eds.). (2014). <i>The postpolitical and its discontents: Spaces of
depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics. </i>Edinburgh University Press.</p>
<p>Žižek, S. (1989). <i>The Sublime Object of Ideology. </i>Verso.</p>
</div>
</div>
<section class="project-nav py-2"></section>
<footer class="footer" id="footer"></footer>
<script src="js/pages.js"></script>
</body>
</html>