Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Better IFC Label Configuration #7

Open
dz333 opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Support Better IFC Label Configuration #7

dz333 opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dz333
Copy link
Collaborator

dz333 commented Nov 7, 2019

Currently, FIRRTL has a default implementation of labels, which is the same as the one described in the Hyperflow paper.

These labels (in chisel code) look like this:
Label(Level(<confidentiality representation>), Level(<integrity representation>))

Users may want simpler (or more complex) labels than these, for example those that only check confidentiality. Users may additionally want to modify how labels are represented as runtime and how the "flows to" check is implemented.

The base class is implemented in src/main/firrtl/Policy.scala but it would be nice to have a suite of supported implementation.

Furthermore, it would be nice to add a configuration option to select between any of the default or any "installed" policies. This issue should be split into multiple sub issues.

@dz333 dz333 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 7, 2019
@dz333 dz333 mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant