Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Discuss][Zeta] Support pekko as new distributed service framework #8416

Open
2 of 3 tasks
hailin0 opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 8 comments
Open
2 of 3 tasks

[Discuss][Zeta] Support pekko as new distributed service framework #8416

hailin0 opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@hailin0
Copy link
Member

hailin0 commented Jan 1, 2025

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the feature and found no similar feature requirement.

Description

Currently we use hazelcast as the distributed service framework, but we found some problems:

pekko

Usage Scenario

No response

Related issues

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@hailin0 hailin0 added the discuss label Jan 1, 2025
@hailin0
Copy link
Member Author

hailin0 commented Jan 1, 2025

Do you have any suggestions? @Hisoka-X

@hailin0 hailin0 changed the title [Discuss][Zeta] Support pekko as a new distributed service framework [Discuss][Zeta] Support pekko as new distributed service framework Jan 1, 2025
@Hisoka-X
Copy link
Member

Hisoka-X commented Jan 2, 2025

+1 for pekko. cc @apache/seatunnel-committers

@liugddx
Copy link
Member

liugddx commented Jan 2, 2025

+1. Sounds good.

@liugddx
Copy link
Member

liugddx commented Jan 2, 2025

This is another option https://github.com/ray-project/ray

@dailai
Copy link
Contributor

dailai commented Jan 2, 2025

+1

1 similar comment
@zhangshenghang
Copy link
Member

+1

@caicancai
Copy link
Member

+1, Based on my understanding of pekko, this is a very large project

@Xuxiaotuan
Copy link

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants