Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backward-compatibility rules on LIST type is unclear #465

Closed
wgtmac opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #466
Closed

Backward-compatibility rules on LIST type is unclear #465

wgtmac opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #466
Assignees

Comments

@wgtmac
Copy link
Member

wgtmac commented Oct 30, 2024

Describe the enhancement requested

The C++ reader of parquet-cpp is having a hard time to read Parquet file written by parquet-java with parquet.avro.write-old-list-structure=true and schema below:

optional group a (LIST) {
  repeated group array (LIST) {
    repeated int32 array;
  }
}

See apache/arrow#43994 and apache/arrow#43995

wgtmac added a commit to wgtmac/parquet-format that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
wgtmac added a commit to wgtmac/parquet-format that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
wgtmac added a commit to wgtmac/parquet-format that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
wgtmac added a commit to wgtmac/parquet-format that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
wgtmac added a commit to wgtmac/parquet-format that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
wgtmac added a commit to wgtmac/parquet-format that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
wgtmac added a commit to wgtmac/parquet-format that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
wgtmac added a commit to wgtmac/parquet-format that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2024
wgtmac added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: Ed Seidl <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: emkornfield <[email protected]>
@wgtmac wgtmac self-assigned this Dec 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant