The Parquet Spec doesn't specify whether multiple columns are allowed to have the same name.

[asfimport]

The parquet format specification doesn't say whether a Parquet file having columns with the same name (in the same group node, so really exactly the same name) is valid. I.e., say I have a Parquet file with two columns. Both are called x. Is this file a valid Parquet file?

Reporter: Jan Finis / @JFinis

_{Note: This issue was originally created as PARQUET-2345. Please see the migration documentation for further details.}

[asfimport]

Gang Wu / @wgtmac:
I didn't find any statement to disallow identical field names in the parquet specs. For engines projecting columns on field ordinals or field ids, identical field names may not be a big issue. It is a good convention to avoid them.

[asfimport]

Micah Kornfield / @emkornfield:
I've at least seen in the wild two columns containing the same name only diverging by case sensitivity.  I agree we should recommend against them since its not clear they will be able to handled well.  If we do update docs, we should also recommend against naming columns using "." as a delimeter as this can also lead to ambiguity.