You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Lately I'm finding myself using buffer numbers in various :b commands, but I still like ordinal numbering for switching between buffers using Buftabline. Would you be open to a g:buftabline_numbers option that shows both?
I'm thinking it would look something like: 1 foo.txt [1] | 2 bar.txt [7] | 3 baz.txt [2]. If you're open to this I'd be glad to try implementing it myself, but I wanted to ask first since it could be treading on the ground of #35.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I’m not opposed to this on general principle, but I don’t want the code to get too much more complex, and the design would have to look nice in every possible combination of options. That seems… unlikely to be achievable. I’m not happy to discourage you (or that I’m turning away users while dragging my feet on a solution for such a long time), but I don’t want to compromise either…
Lately I'm finding myself using buffer numbers in various
:b
commands, but I still like ordinal numbering for switching between buffers using Buftabline. Would you be open to ag:buftabline_numbers
option that shows both?I'm thinking it would look something like:
1 foo.txt [1] | 2 bar.txt [7] | 3 baz.txt [2]
. If you're open to this I'd be glad to try implementing it myself, but I wanted to ask first since it could be treading on the ground of #35.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: