Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deletion of unused branches to clear confusion #118

Closed
dobefore opened this issue Dec 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

deletion of unused branches to clear confusion #118

dobefore opened this issue Dec 29, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@dobefore
Copy link
Contributor

@VikashKothary ,Hi.Some users may be confused about difference between many branched,especially develop and master.This happens
sometimes,like #56 ,#117.
How does that sound?

@VikashKothary
Copy link
Member

So both branches will be needed for our CI strategy. The master (which I should rename to main) should be a stable version of the server.

I unfortunately have not been very good at cutting releases manually. But that is the goal.

@dobefore
Copy link
Contributor Author

dobefore commented Dec 29, 2021

sorry for my partial thought.how about using tags to indicate releases and keep develop as lastest branch like https://github.com/ankitects/anki .
I almostly understand what you convey,once a stable version will be released,current state of develop branch will be cut and save to master branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants