Samples at a glance

Check out each project's README for more information and reasoning.

Sample	Complexity / Learning cost	Testability	Dexcount*	LOC**	Typical use case / advantages
todo-mvp	Low	High	11386 (100%)	3451	No dependencies, low learning cost.
todo-mvp-clean	Medium-Low	Very High	+1%	4121	Large development teams, focus on testability and maintainability
todo-mvp-dagger	Medium	Very High	+2%	3699	Full flexibility to create variants for automated and manual testing
todo-databinding	Medium-Low	High	+10%	3327	Cleaner layouts with complex data models
todo-mvp-loaders	Medium-Low	Medium-high	+1%	3517	Asynchronous loading with no external dependencies
todo-mvp-contentproviders	Medium	Medium	-0.5%	3535	Sharing data with other apps or widgets
todo-mvp-rxjava	High	High	+11%	3740	Complex data flows

* The dex method count is particular to this app and won't grow linearly. For example, bigger projects will probably benefit from using Data Binding compensating the overhead.

**LOC: Lines of code, Java only.

APK size

The differences in APK size are insignificant (less than 1%), with the exception of the Data Binding and RxJava samples. As with the dex method count, bigger projects won't be affected.