Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Parameter for cifar10/100-r10/100 #9

Open
Huangszz opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Parameter for cifar10/100-r10/100 #9

Huangszz opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Huangszz
Copy link

Hi, great work!
I have trained cifar10_r10, cifar100_r10 and cifar100_r100. ALL the bACC of 3 ERM models is better but cifar100_r100 M2m model has SOTA performance. Can you tell me how to do to improve my model performance of c10_r10 and c100_r10?
@Huangszz
Copy link
Author

Hi, great work!
I have trained cifar10_r10, cifar100_r10 and cifar100_r100. ALL the bACC of 3 ERM models is better but only cifar100_r100 M2m model has SOTA performance. Can you tell me how to do to improve my model performance of c10_r10 and c100_r10?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Huangszz