You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 8, 2022. It is now read-only.
For example, the following snippets show the part of Cargo.toml of rustc-ap-syntax 583.0.0 and 605.0.0:
[package]
edition = "2018"name = "rustc-ap-syntax"version = "583.0.0"authors = ["The Rust Project Developers"]
description = "Automatically published version of the package `syntax` in the rust-lang/rust repository from commit f7b05af814f02681d8973438df4ed5792f581841 The publishing script for this crate lives at: https://github.com/alexcrichton/rustc-auto-publish\n"license = "MIT / Apache-2.0"repository = "https://github.com/rust-lang/rust"
[lib]
name = "syntax"path = "lib.rs"doctest = false
[dependencies.bitflags]
version = "1.0"
[package]
edition = "2018"name = "rustc-ap-syntax"version = "605.0.0"authors = ["The Rust Project Developers"]
description = "Automatically published version of the package `syntax` in the rust-lang/rust repository from commit c6293e359848c8c7275330719b33ccd168df04c3 The publishing script for this crate lives at: https://github.com/alexcrichton/rustc-auto-publish\n"license = "MIT / Apache-2.0"repository = "https://github.com/rust-lang/rust"
[lib]
path = "lib.rs"doctest = false
[dependencies.bitflags]
version = "1.0"
Note that in the Cargo.toml of 605.0.0, name = "syntax" is removed from the [lib] section. Hence, the name of the crate has been renamed to rustc_ap_syntax from syntax. Is this change intentional?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For example, the following snippets show the part of Cargo.toml of
rustc-ap-syntax
583.0.0 and 605.0.0:Note that in the Cargo.toml of 605.0.0,
name = "syntax"
is removed from the[lib]
section. Hence, the name of the crate has been renamed torustc_ap_syntax
fromsyntax
. Is this change intentional?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: