You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
When opening atom in a directory that is not a git repository, git-plus takes substantial time to activate. These are the samples taken when opening atom in an empty directory: 318ms, 388ms, 416ms, 405ms, 418ms, 566ms, 399ms, 395ms, 415ms, 400ms.
In comparison, opening atom with git-plus in a git repository takes always under 10ms.
I'm running atom 1.40.1 with git-plus 8.7.1 under Linux.
Steps to reproduce:
mkdir git-plus-empty-test && cd git-plus-empty-test
atom .
Open timecop
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Whoa, that's really weird. Yea that's consistent on my computer too.
I just profiled the actual execution of this package's activation, it only takes at most 4ms in any window, regardless of whether there are any folders/repositories even though timecop reports a much bigger number. I'll have to investigate more but I imagine it's some of the auxillary stuff atom does around the package activation that might be padding the numbers.
When opening atom in a directory that is not a git repository,
git-plus
takes substantial time to activate. These are the samples taken when opening atom in an empty directory: 318ms, 388ms, 416ms, 405ms, 418ms, 566ms, 399ms, 395ms, 415ms, 400ms.In comparison, opening atom with
git-plus
in a git repository takes always under 10ms.I'm running atom 1.40.1 with git-plus 8.7.1 under Linux.
Steps to reproduce:
mkdir git-plus-empty-test && cd git-plus-empty-test
atom .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: