-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor fix update/code clean up #4044
Refactor fix update/code clean up #4044
Conversation
Updates from airqo staging
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/bigquery_api.py (1)
Line range hint
893-921
: Document and implement the pending TODO items.The
fetch_raw_readings
method contains:
- An undocumented TODO comment
- A comment about reviewing model performance with/without location
- A TODO comment about reviewing frequency
These comments suggest incomplete implementation or pending tasks that should be addressed.
Would you like me to:
- Generate comprehensive documentation for this method?
- Help implement the model performance review logic?
- Create a GitHub issue to track these pending tasks?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/bigquery_api.py
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/bigquery_api.py (1)
719-719
: LGTM! Addition of 'network' to default group_by is well-implemented.
The change to include 'network' in the default group_by list aligns with the PR objective of adding network-based data re-calibration support. The implementation maintains backward compatibility while enhancing the granularity of data aggregation.
Let's verify the impact on existing query patterns:
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show direct usage of dynamic_averaging_query
with explicit group_by parameters, but we need to understand:
- The full implementation of query_data to see how it handles dynamic queries
- Any test cases that might break with the new default
- Any configuration files that might have predefined group by columns
The previous results didn't give us enough context about the query_data implementation and potential test cases. Let's examine these specific areas to ensure the change is safe.
Addition of 'network' to default group_by is safe and well-implemented
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase:
- The
query_data
method properly handles thenetwork
parameter anddynamic_query
flag, showing it's designed to work with network-based grouping. - Direct usage of
dynamic_averaging_query
shows explicit group_by parameters being passed, which means the new default won't affect existing calls. - No test files were found that could be impacted by this change.
- The infrastructure configuration files don't contain any conflicting group_by settings.
The change maintains backward compatibility while enhancing the data aggregation capabilities for network-based analysis. The implementation is safe to proceed with.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing usages of dynamic_averaging_query to ensure they handle the new network grouping correctly
# Search for direct calls to dynamic_averaging_query
echo "Checking direct method calls:"
rg -A 5 "dynamic_averaging_query\("
# Search for calls to query_data with dynamic_query=True
echo "Checking indirect usage via query_data:"
rg -A 5 'query_data.*dynamic_query=True'
Length of output: 1847
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation of query_data to understand how it uses dynamic_averaging_query
ast-grep --pattern 'def query_data($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any test files that might be using these methods
fd test_ --exec rg -l "dynamic_averaging_query|query_data.*dynamic_query"
# Look for any configuration files that might define default group by columns
fd "config|settings" --type f --exec rg -l "group_by.*device|network"
Length of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the actual implementation of query_data method
rg -A 20 "def query_data" src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/bigquery_api.py
# Check the content of the configure_master.yml for any relevant group_by settings
cat infra/ansible/roles/k8s/tasks/configure_master.yml
# Look for any test files specifically in the workflows directory
fd test_ src/workflows --exec rg -l "dynamic_averaging_query"
Length of output: 2704
Description
[Provide a brief description of the changes made in this PR]
Adds the network column for data re-calibration.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
network
field.Bug Fixes