Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

addressing a runtime error for listing cohorts #4040

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Dec 10, 2024

Description

addressing a runtime error for listing cohorts

Changes Made

  • addressing a runtime error for listing cohorts

Testing

  • Tested locally
  • Tested against staging environment
  • Relevant tests passed: [List test names]

Affected Services

  • Which services were modified:
    • Device Registry

Endpoints Ready for Testing

  • New endpoints ready for testing:
    • Get Cohorts

API Documentation Updated?

  • Yes, API documentation was updated
  • No, API documentation does not need updating

Additional Notes

addressing a runtime error for listing cohorts

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new bulk script for device management that fetches site data and updates group associations via a REST API.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected the aggregation method in the cohort model to ensure accurate data aggregation based on cohort properties.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications to two main files: Cohort.js and a new script new-bulk-script.js. In Cohort.js, the aggregation pipeline in the list method is corrected from using .groups() to .group(), addressing a syntax error in the MongoDB framework. The new script facilitates device management by fetching site data via a REST API and updating device groups accordingly, incorporating error handling throughout the process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/device-registry/models/Cohort.js Updated the aggregation pipeline in list method from .groups() to .group() to fix a syntax error.
src/device-registry/utils/scripts/new-bulk-script.js Introduced a new script to fetch device site data and update associated groups using Axios, with error handling.

Possibly related PRs

🎉 In the land of code where functions play,
A syntax error led us astray.
With a simple fix, the pipeline's now bright,
Cohorts gather, their data in sight.
A new script emerges, fetching with grace,
Updating the groups, in the device space! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.73%. Comparing base (68a0b0f) to head (b41583a).
Report is 47 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #4040   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.73%   11.73%           
========================================
  Files          114      114           
  Lines        15349    15349           
  Branches       319      319           
========================================
  Hits          1801     1801           
  Misses       13548    13548           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/device-registry/models/Cohort.js 24.50% <ø> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

Device registry changes in this PR available for preview here

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/device-registry/models/Cohort.js (1)

Line range hint 217-226: Consider optimizing the aggregation pipeline performance.

The current implementation might face performance issues with large datasets:

  1. The allowDiskUse(true) indicates potential memory pressure
  2. The lookup operation followed by grouping could be expensive

Consider these optimizations:

  1. Add index on the cohorts field in the devices collection to optimize the lookup
  2. If possible, limit the fields in lookup to reduce memory usage
  3. Consider pagination to limit the result set size
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5fac056 and b41583a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/device-registry/models/Cohort.js (1 hunks)
  • src/device-registry/utils/scripts/new-bulk-script.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/device-registry/models/Cohort.js (1)

Line range hint 217-226: LGTM! The MongoDB aggregation syntax is now correct.

The change from .groups() to .group() fixes the runtime error. This is the correct MongoDB aggregation stage syntax.

Comment on lines +11 to +18
const NETWORK_MAPPINGS = {
// iqair: "permian-health",
// usembassy: "us-embassy",
// urbanbetter: "urban-better",
// kcca: "kcca",
// airqo: "airqo",
// Add more mappings as needed
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Network mappings are all commented out.

All network mappings are commented out, which will cause all devices to be assigned to the "unknown" group.

Please uncomment and verify the required network mappings:

 const NETWORK_MAPPINGS = {
-  //   iqair: "permian-health",
-  //   usembassy: "us-embassy",
-  //   urbanbetter: "urban-better",
-  //   kcca: "kcca",
-  //   airqo: "airqo",
+  iqair: "permian-health",
+  usembassy: "us-embassy",
+  urbanbetter: "urban-better",
+  kcca: "kcca",
+  airqo: "airqo",
   // Add more mappings as needed
 };
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const NETWORK_MAPPINGS = {
// iqair: "permian-health",
// usembassy: "us-embassy",
// urbanbetter: "urban-better",
// kcca: "kcca",
// airqo: "airqo",
// Add more mappings as needed
};
const NETWORK_MAPPINGS = {
iqair: "permian-health",
usembassy: "us-embassy",
urbanbetter: "urban-better",
kcca: "kcca",
airqo: "airqo",
// Add more mappings as needed
};

Comment on lines +4 to +9
const url = "http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites";
const config = {
headers: {
Authorization: "",
},
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Security concern: Hardcoded URL and empty Authorization header.

The script contains security vulnerabilities:

  1. Hardcoded localhost URL
  2. Empty Authorization header

Consider this safer implementation:

-const url = "http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites";
-const config = {
-  headers: {
-    Authorization: "",
-  },
-};
+const url = process.env.API_URL || "http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites";
+const config = {
+  headers: {
+    Authorization: process.env.API_TOKEN,
+  },
+};
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const url = "http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites";
const config = {
headers: {
Authorization: "",
},
};
const url = process.env.API_URL || "http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites";
const config = {
headers: {
Authorization: process.env.API_TOKEN,
},
};

Comment on lines +46 to +67
for (let i = 0; i < response.data.sites.length; i += 10) {
const batch = response.data.sites.slice(i, i + 10);

for (const site of batch) {
const group = NETWORK_MAPPINGS[site.network] || DEFAULT_GROUP;

if (group !== DEFAULT_GROUP) {
const url = `http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites?id=${site._id}`;
const data = { groups: [group] };
// console.log("the data:");
// console.dir(data);

try {
// Uncomment if you want to make the PUT request
const putResponse = await axios.put(url, data, config);
console.log("PUT response:", putResponse.data);
} catch (error) {
console.error("PUT error:", error.message);
}
}
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling and batch processing.

The current batch processing implementation:

  1. Lacks retry mechanism for failed requests
  2. Doesn't track failed updates
  3. Could benefit from concurrent processing

Consider this enhanced implementation:

-    for (let i = 0; i < response.data.sites.length; i += 10) {
-      const batch = response.data.sites.slice(i, i + 10);
-
-      for (const site of batch) {
+    const processBatch = async (sites) => {
+      const results = await Promise.allSettled(
+        sites.map(async (site) => {
           const group = NETWORK_MAPPINGS[site.network] || DEFAULT_GROUP;
 
           if (group !== DEFAULT_GROUP) {
             const url = `http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites?id=${site._id}`;
             const data = { groups: [group] };
 
             try {
-              const putResponse = await axios.put(url, data, config);
+              const putResponse = await axios.put(url, data, config).catch(async (error) => {
+                if (error.response?.status === 429) {
+                  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000));
+                  return axios.put(url, data, config);
+                }
+                throw error;
+              });
               console.log("PUT response:", putResponse.data);
+              return { success: true, site: site._id };
             } catch (error) {
               console.error("PUT error:", error.message);
+              return { success: false, site: site._id, error: error.message };
             }
           }
+          return { success: true, site: site._id, skipped: true };
+        })
+      );
+      return results;
+    };

+    const BATCH_SIZE = 10;
+    const failedUpdates = [];
+    
+    for (let i = 0; i < response.data.sites.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+      const batch = response.data.sites.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
+      const results = await processBatch(batch);
+      
+      results.forEach(result => {
+        if (result.status === 'rejected' || !result.value.success) {
+          failedUpdates.push(result.value || result.reason);
+        }
+      });
+      
+      // Add a small delay between batches to prevent rate limiting
+      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 100));
     }
+    
+    if (failedUpdates.length > 0) {
+      console.error('Failed updates:', failedUpdates);
+    }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
for (let i = 0; i < response.data.sites.length; i += 10) {
const batch = response.data.sites.slice(i, i + 10);
for (const site of batch) {
const group = NETWORK_MAPPINGS[site.network] || DEFAULT_GROUP;
if (group !== DEFAULT_GROUP) {
const url = `http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites?id=${site._id}`;
const data = { groups: [group] };
// console.log("the data:");
// console.dir(data);
try {
// Uncomment if you want to make the PUT request
const putResponse = await axios.put(url, data, config);
console.log("PUT response:", putResponse.data);
} catch (error) {
console.error("PUT error:", error.message);
}
}
}
}
const processBatch = async (sites) => {
const results = await Promise.allSettled(
sites.map(async (site) => {
const group = NETWORK_MAPPINGS[site.network] || DEFAULT_GROUP;
if (group !== DEFAULT_GROUP) {
const url = `http://localhost:3000/api/v2/devices/sites?id=${site._id}`;
const data = { groups: [group] };
try {
const putResponse = await axios.put(url, data, config).catch(async (error) => {
if (error.response?.status === 429) {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000));
return axios.put(url, data, config);
}
throw error;
});
console.log("PUT response:", putResponse.data);
return { success: true, site: site._id };
} catch (error) {
console.error("PUT error:", error.message);
return { success: false, site: site._id, error: error.message };
}
}
return { success: true, site: site._id, skipped: true };
})
);
return results;
};
const BATCH_SIZE = 10;
const failedUpdates = [];
for (let i = 0; i < response.data.sites.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
const batch = response.data.sites.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
const results = await processBatch(batch);
results.forEach(result => {
if (result.status === 'rejected' || !result.value.success) {
failedUpdates.push(result.value || result.reason);
}
});
// Add a small delay between batches to prevent rate limiting
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 100));
}
if (failedUpdates.length > 0) {
console.error('Failed updates:', failedUpdates);
}

@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit 9f58416 into staging Dec 10, 2024
52 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart deleted the hf-list-cohorts branch December 10, 2024 20:29
@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant