Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluation result with officially released weights. #4

Open
YuchenLiu98 opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Evaluation result with officially released weights. #4

YuchenLiu98 opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@YuchenLiu98
Copy link

Thanks a lot for your excellent job. I wonder how you evaluate the trained model, do you use ./scripts/more/eval/pope.sh, which uses llava.eval.model_vqa_loader for evaluation (seems no modification from llava1.5). However, I downloaded your released model weight (LLaVA_MORE-llama_3_1-8B-finetuning) and do evaluation, but find extremely low results for textvqa (only 38.66%) and gqa (52.39%). Is there something wrong with the evaluation? Thanks a lot for your help.

@federico1-creator
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @YuchenLiu98, thank you once again for your interest in our LLaVA-MORE project.

For evaluation purposes, we use the lmms-eval library (https://github.com/EvolvingLMMs-Lab/lmms-eval), in which we integrate our models.

Regarding the results on Text-VQA, please note that the results shown in our table are calculated by considering the OCR tokens as part of the input prompt.
EvolvingLMMs-Lab/lmms-eval#6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants