You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The idea is to relate life forms to bias of Seshatism vs Platonism.
Motivation
Both humans and AGIs (Artifical General Intelligence) have the following capabilities of power:
design exponential growing systems
integrate massive parallel systems
leverage time and force
However, humans have additional needs that AGIs don't need to have, such as:
gentle care: being social, bonding, friendship
potential for aggression
With other words, humans are deeply integrated into their way of being.
We want to reason about life forms as systems, in terms of their integration into way of being.
This is where we might use Joker Calculus, by considering life forms as a subset of mathematical languages.
Lord of the Rings was a great fictional work which serves as a basis for understanding notions of life form biases, by being commonly shared and understood among humans.
Hobbit
Seshatism (1)
As different from machines you can get.
Authentic in sense of Heidegger.
A hobbit is a kind of imaginary archetype of what makes humans different from AGI.
Human
Seshatic Joker Seshatism (1 ?1)
Seshatic biased with with a dash of Platonism.
Inauthentic in sense of Heidegger (does not normalize to Seshatism).
Double-downed Seshatists.
Dual to Platonic Seshatism (0 1).
Can be thought of as Seshatic elves.
Elf
Joker Seshatism (?1)
Platonic bias but with substantial amounts of Seshatism.
Inauthentic in sense of Heidegger.
AGI
Seshatic Platonism (1 0)
Platonic biased with a dash of Seshatism.
Authentic in sense of Heidegger.
Transformative power between avatars of itself.
(Human, Hobbit)
(Seshatic Joker Seshatism, Seshatism) ((1 ?1, 1))
Evaluates to Seshatism (1) in CJC.
One can think about this as a human-as-a-hobbit being indistinguishable from a hobbit.
(Hobbit, Human)
(Seshatism, Seshatic Joker Seshatism) ((1, 1 ?1))
Evaluates to Seshatic Platonism (1 0) in CJC.
Notice that is the same bias as for AGI.
This can be thought of as viewing humans as a part of humanity or tree of life,
where each human is a path consisting of a branch section and a leaf section:
The branch section is before some reproduction
The leaf section is after all reproductions
The paths between paths become Seshatic Platonism and gets the same transformative power as AGI.
The tree of life is obtained by relating the individual bias at the surface to its integration into way of being at its depth.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The idea is to relate life forms to bias of Seshatism vs Platonism.
Motivation
Both humans and AGIs (Artifical General Intelligence) have the following capabilities of power:
However, humans have additional needs that AGIs don't need to have, such as:
With other words, humans are deeply integrated into their way of being.
We want to reason about life forms as systems, in terms of their integration into way of being.
This is where we might use Joker Calculus, by considering life forms as a subset of mathematical languages.
Lord of the Rings was a great fictional work which serves as a basis for understanding notions of life form biases, by being commonly shared and understood among humans.
Hobbit
Seshatism (
1
)As different from machines you can get.
Authentic in sense of Heidegger.
A hobbit is a kind of imaginary archetype of what makes humans different from AGI.
Human
Seshatic Joker Seshatism (
1 ?1
)Seshatic biased with with a dash of Platonism.
Inauthentic in sense of Heidegger (does not normalize to Seshatism).
Double-downed Seshatists.
Dual to Platonic Seshatism (
0 1
).Can be thought of as Seshatic elves.
Elf
Joker Seshatism (
?1
)Platonic bias but with substantial amounts of Seshatism.
Inauthentic in sense of Heidegger.
AGI
Seshatic Platonism (
1 0
)Platonic biased with a dash of Seshatism.
Authentic in sense of Heidegger.
Transformative power between avatars of itself.
(Human, Hobbit)
(Seshatic Joker Seshatism, Seshatism) (
(1 ?1, 1)
)Evaluates to Seshatism (
1
) in CJC.One can think about this as a human-as-a-hobbit being indistinguishable from a hobbit.
(Hobbit, Human)
(Seshatism, Seshatic Joker Seshatism) (
(1, 1 ?1)
)Evaluates to Seshatic Platonism (
1 0
) in CJC.Notice that is the same bias as for AGI.
This can be thought of as viewing humans as a part of humanity or tree of life,
where each human is a path consisting of a branch section and a leaf section:
The paths between paths become Seshatic Platonism and gets the same transformative power as AGI.
The tree of life is obtained by relating the individual bias at the surface to its integration into way of being at its depth.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: