Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IOP - JInst bibcodes too long, JElS vs. EcSJ #11

Open
csgrant00 opened this issue Aug 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

IOP - JInst bibcodes too long, JElS vs. EcSJ #11

csgrant00 opened this issue Aug 4, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@csgrant00
Copy link

JInst (Needs the first digit of the identifier removed to allow for P/C). Note I have been leaving as is for the "T" ones, but willing to insert a T instead of the 1st digit for consistency
python run.py -p "/proj/ads/abstracts/data/IOPP/2023-08-02/1748-0221/**/*.xml" -t jats -f ioptest

JElS vs. EcSJ
I'm using the former, you're using the latter
python run.py -p "/proj/ads/abstracts/data/IOPP/2023-08-02/1945-7111/**/*.xml" -t jats -f ioptest

@seasidesparrow
Copy link
Member

For JElS versus EcSJ, the ISSN 0013-4651 was in journals database as the print ISSN for both. I've deleted the entry for EcSJ.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants