-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PSA: font family name will change #77
Comments
I respect the decision, but wanted to share my sorrow. I hope the following aspect was considered in the name change discussion: How likely is it that in the next, say 10 years again there will be such a dramatic rework of the font that causes incompatibilities to earlier versions? There have been other versions before (0.x to 3.x), that didn’t require renaming. Will the font name now change every time the global version makes a big step – even when there are no compatibility issues to former versions? Or will there be e.g. Source Serif 4, version 6.080? In my opinion a version number in the font name is not forward compatible. I would have liked to see Adobe only ditch the “Pro” and instead used “Source Serif” as the base name. (JOKE:) Then “Source Serif Neue” or “Source Serif Next” is still free for a backwards incompatible version in 10 or 15 years. |
I think the naming change will lead to a more consistent experience, which is much preferable to document reflow.
|
Thank you very much, Frank, for the explanation. I was not aware, that the metrics would change that often. Meanwhile I also found the thread google/fonts#1307, where the weight change of Montserrat caused much upset. And while I still don’t like version numbers in font names that much, I completely agree that it’s a practicable solution until software honors font versioning. Thanks again for your effort! |
Unfortunately this blocks upgrading this font in LibreOffice in the future. I am not comfortable breaking users’ templates and documents each time a font name change is done. |
@fitojb Thats the whole idea. You might inadvertently be breaking people's documents if the family name stayed the same. |
Do you really expect to change things like the line height, now that diacritics support is complete? Minor advance width changes are livable, but this is too much. |
@fitojb Diacritics support is never complete! ;-) (really – virtually all other issues are about adding more diacritics). |
Source Serif 4 has been released: |
The Source Serif Pro font was [renamed to Source Serif][Rename]. [Rename]: adobe-fonts/source-serif#77
Recently, Source Sans/Serif Pro fonts got renamed. The "Pro" suffix was replaced with the major version of the font name. In the case of Source Serif, the change was announced in adobe-fonts/source-serif#77 and besides the name font metric have been changed too. Therefore, documents using the old "Pro" version might look differently when the font is changed to the new "4" version. In the case of Source Sans, the metrics seem not to have been changed (adobe-fonts/source-sans#192), but this comment (adobe-fonts/source-sans#192 (comment)) suggests that it might happen in the future. Due to the above, it makes sense to keep both old "Pro" and new (numbered) fonts as separate packages. This commit reintroduced the old "Pro" versions. It seems that Arch Linux is also distributing both versions: https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/0d70461e5a26cde02cadfda64078eb93192c6caa/trunk/PKGBUILD Closes NixOS#157972
media-fonts/source-pro installs 3 font families. A while ago the serif and sans-serif fonts were renamed (and will be renamed again) while the monospace font kept the same name. Furthermore, the fonts now have the major version in their name. The fonts will be split into their own packages and the old package will be masked since it isn't bump-able. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865103 Upstream-announcement: adobe-fonts/source-serif#77 Signed-off-by: Ronny (tastytea) Gutbrod <[email protected]>
media-fonts/source-pro installs 3 font families. A while ago the serif and sans-serif fonts were renamed (and will be renamed again) while the monospace font kept the same name. Furthermore, the fonts now have the major version in their name. The fonts will be split into their own packages and the old package will be masked since it isn't bump-able. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865103 Upstream-announcement: adobe-fonts/source-serif#77 Signed-off-by: Ronny (tastytea) Gutbrod <[email protected]>
media-fonts/source-pro installs 3 font families. A while ago the serif and sans-serif fonts were renamed (and will be renamed again) while the monospace font kept the same name. Furthermore, the fonts now have the major version in their name. The fonts will be split into their own packages and the old package will be masked since it isn't bump-able. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865103 Upstream-announcement: adobe-fonts/source-serif#77 Signed-off-by: Ronny (tastytea) Gutbrod <[email protected]>
media-fonts/source-pro installs 3 font families. A while ago the serif and sans-serif fonts were renamed (and will be renamed again) while the monospace font kept the same name. Furthermore, the fonts now have the major version in their name. The fonts will be split into their own packages and the old package will be masked since it isn't bump-able. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865103 Upstream-announcement: adobe-fonts/source-serif#77 Signed-off-by: Ronny (tastytea) Gutbrod <[email protected]>
media-fonts/source-pro installs 3 font families. A while ago the serif and sans-serif fonts were renamed (and will be renamed again) while the monospace font kept the same name. Furthermore, the fonts now have the major version in their name. The fonts will be split into their own packages and the old package will be masked since it isn't bump-able. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865103 Upstream-announcement: adobe-fonts/source-serif#77 Signed-off-by: Ronny (tastytea) Gutbrod <[email protected]>
media-fonts/source-pro installs 3 font families. A while ago the serif and sans-serif fonts were renamed (and will be renamed again) while the monospace font kept the same name. Furthermore, the fonts now have the major version in their name. The fonts will be split into their own packages and the old package will be masked since it isn't bump-able. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865103 Upstream-announcement: adobe-fonts/source-serif#77 Signed-off-by: Ronny (tastytea) Gutbrod <[email protected]>
media-fonts/source-pro installs 3 font families. A while ago the serif and sans-serif fonts were renamed (and will be renamed again) while the monospace font kept the same name. Furthermore, the fonts now have the major version in their name. The fonts will be split into their own packages and the old package will be masked since it isn't bump-able. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865103 Upstream-announcement: adobe-fonts/source-serif#77 Signed-off-by: Ronny (tastytea) Gutbrod <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Joonas Niilola <[email protected]>
With Source Serif’s optical sizes on the horizon, the decision was made to change the family name to Source Serif 4.
The reason is twofold:
The family name going forward will be Source Serif 4, which corresponds to the current global version number.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: