Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non-constraint step size for oddly aligned magnetic field #391

Open
beomki-yeo opened this issue Feb 13, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #856
Open

Non-constraint step size for oddly aligned magnetic field #391

beomki-yeo opened this issue Feb 13, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #856
Labels
bug Something isn't working priority: low Low priority

Comments

@beomki-yeo
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe @niermann999 has seen that a propagator with the non-constraint step size skips the surfaces occasionally. I also have observed the same issue in Telescope geometry where it should not happen at all. I don't know the exact reason but this should be fixed

@beomki-yeo beomki-yeo added priority: high high priority bug Something isn't working labels Feb 13, 2023
@beomki-yeo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I also have observed the same issue in Telescope geometry where it should not happen at all.

This was fixed by #398, which turned out to be due to the track parameter change with random_scatterer. The remaining issue might be the oddly aligned magnetic field case which can make tracks skip the surfaces, but it is definitely not an urgent problem

@beomki-yeo beomki-yeo added priority: low Low priority and removed priority: high high priority labels Mar 13, 2023
@beomki-yeo beomki-yeo changed the title Non-constraint step size does not work well Non-constraint step size for oddly aligned magnetic field Apr 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working priority: low Low priority
Projects
None yet
1 participant