You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The low-rare range contains 8 values, the high-rare range 7 values.
The low-uncommon range contains 15 values, the high-uncommon range 16 values.
To be symmetrical, the boundary between high uncommon/rare should probably have been 89/90 (like it is between uncommon/rare eye shapes), instead of 90/91. But the main website matches the ranges on the wiki, e.g showing “ENERGETIC (90)” (https://app.aavegotchi.com/gotchi/7793) and “HYPER (91)” (https://app.aavegotchi.com/gotchi/9537).
Assuming that trait ranges may become important soon, it would be good to have an official confirmation of whether these existing ranges are intentional, or should be corrected. It's relevant for aavegotchi owners when deciding where to spend spirit points.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I believe this is a long-known issue, but don't see it logged anywhere...
The trait ranges as documented on the wiki (https://wiki.aavegotchi.com/en/traits) and displayed in the main website are unbalanced:
The low-rare range contains 8 values, the high-rare range 7 values.
The low-uncommon range contains 15 values, the high-uncommon range 16 values.
To be symmetrical, the boundary between high uncommon/rare should probably have been 89/90 (like it is between uncommon/rare eye shapes), instead of 90/91. But the main website matches the ranges on the wiki, e.g showing “ENERGETIC (90)” (https://app.aavegotchi.com/gotchi/7793) and “HYPER (91)” (https://app.aavegotchi.com/gotchi/9537).
Assuming that trait ranges may become important soon, it would be good to have an official confirmation of whether these existing ranges are intentional, or should be corrected. It's relevant for aavegotchi owners when deciding where to spend spirit points.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: