Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formal (or not!) Grammar or Backus-Naur Form? #4

Open
russ-travix opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Formal (or not!) Grammar or Backus-Naur Form? #4

russ-travix opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@russ-travix
Copy link

Hi Angelo,

I'm so happy to have found your VCF Berlin talk on B, I'd been looking for something more concrete than the minimum I could find on Rosetta Code!
Thank you so much for your talk and your work, it's hugely appreciated.

Do you have, or is it even worth having, a formal Grammar for B?

Thanks again and, Ich Wunsch dir en Frohe Weihnachten!
-Rune Stephenson.

@aap
Copy link
Owner

aap commented Dec 30, 2024

Whoops sorry for late reply. There is a grammar given here https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/kbman.pdf but the language evolved a bit over time.

cheers

@russ-travix
Copy link
Author

No problems what so ever, I'm just so very grateful that you've spent time on this language at all! It's more than I'd hoped for and I have to admit, it's a language that's always intrigued/appealed to me!

I very much hope I get to show you some of my experimental this year!

@russ-travix
Copy link
Author

I know you referred to some DEC tape reels that were really useful in rebuilding the Interpreter and so forth.
I wonder if those archives might contain the B source code for the early versions of YACC?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants