Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase functionality of generate_map to handle outputs #71

Closed
kvantricht opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #78
Closed

Increase functionality of generate_map to handle outputs #71

kvantricht opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #78
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@kvantricht
Copy link
Contributor

cc @jdegerickx

generate_map currently requires an output_path to which the result is automatically downloaded. It would be nice if the method could become somewhat more flexible and also provides more interaction with the actual job running on openEO. Specifally, it could be nice to:

  • return the job_id (optionally or always?) for interaction with openEO
  • return the link to created asset (optionally or always?)
  • have the download to local output_path functionality optional

But let's have the discussion here on how to make this serve the different needs.

Disclaimer: possibly these requests require first some changes in GFMAP.

@jdegerickx
Copy link
Contributor

indeed, depending on where you run this, it might not be necessary to download the actual .tif file, but just receive a link to the job_id and a link to the asset(s) generated so you can view the results in the openeo web editor on CDSE.

For the Maps4GPP project, the generate_map function will also be used to generate WorldCereal maps from within the GPP GeoPortal -> for that purpose, we'll need to build a UDP. This will be covered in a different issue

@GriffinBabe GriffinBabe linked a pull request Jun 24, 2024 that will close this issue
@kvantricht kvantricht added this to the System V1 milestone Jun 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants