Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pretrained model performance is low. #2

Open
minju-Kang opened this issue Jun 16, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Pretrained model performance is low. #2

minju-Kang opened this issue Jun 16, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@minju-Kang
Copy link

Hi, I run pretraining code with split_0.01_2 (same with 3DIoUMatch), but I think the performance is much lower than the numbers mentioned on your paper.
I used pv_rcnn.yaml for configuration file, and trained 80 epochs on one GPU.

Car [email protected], 0.70, 0.70:
bbox AP:90.0876, 80.0455, 78.3626
bev AP:88.7344, 78.5149, 70.2348
3d AP:83.6766, 67.3691, 59.6103
aos AP:89.15, 78.45, 76.29
Car [email protected], 0.70, 0.70:
bbox AP:95.5903, 84.4095, 79.1778
bev AP:91.8627, 80.6292, 73.5810
3d AP:83.8539, 68.1927, 61.4822
aos AP:94.45, 82.45, 76.96
Car [email protected], 0.50, 0.50:
bbox AP:90.0876, 80.0455, 78.3626
bev AP:90.2690, 88.1668, 80.0592
3d AP:90.2208, 87.1712, 79.6355
aos AP:89.15, 78.45, 76.29
Car [email protected], 0.50, 0.50:
bbox AP:95.5903, 84.4095, 79.1778
bev AP:95.8997, 89.8074, 82.6548
3d AP:95.8319, 87.3881, 82.1202
aos AP:94.45, 82.45, 76.96
Pedestrian [email protected], 0.50, 0.50:
bbox AP:44.3563, 37.3375, 33.0982
bev AP:43.0798, 35.9866, 31.8159
3d AP:35.3727, 28.8929, 27.9237
aos AP:29.54, 25.10, 22.97
Pedestrian [email protected], 0.50, 0.50:
bbox AP:40.5246, 34.1630, 31.5183
bev AP:39.4852, 31.5727, 28.9043
3d AP:33.9902, 27.9883, 24.5065
aos AP:24.06, 19.80, 18.50
Pedestrian [email protected], 0.25, 0.25:
bbox AP:44.3563, 37.3375, 33.0982
bev AP:47.1612, 39.6489, 38.8192
3d AP:47.1057, 39.5440, 38.6939
aos AP:29.54, 25.10, 22.97
Pedestrian [email protected], 0.25, 0.25:
bbox AP:40.5246, 34.1630, 31.5183
bev AP:45.9999, 38.4472, 34.6189
3d AP:45.9230, 37.2270, 34.5071
aos AP:24.06, 19.80, 18.50
Cyclist [email protected], 0.50, 0.50:
bbox AP:21.4094, 15.6852, 16.0712
bev AP:19.8382, 11.0331, 10.9091
3d AP:12.6055, 9.2240, 8.9105
aos AP:14.14, 10.18, 10.66
Cyclist [email protected], 0.50, 0.50:
bbox AP:18.6879, 11.4710, 11.5689
bev AP:16.2348, 9.5348, 9.2544
3d AP:11.2959, 6.8327, 6.7031
aos AP:12.39, 7.48, 7.74
Cyclist [email protected], 0.25, 0.25:
bbox AP:21.4094, 15.6852, 16.0712
bev AP:21.3333, 15.5184, 15.6056
3d AP:21.3333, 15.4820, 15.5694
aos AP:14.14, 10.18, 10.66
Cyclist [email protected], 0.25, 0.25:
bbox AP:18.6879, 11.4710, 11.5689
bev AP:18.7750, 11.5075, 11.2206
3d AP:18.7750, 11.4757, 11.1858
aos AP:12.39, 7.48, 7.74

Could you share your performance on different split sets?
Also, there are many pv_rcnn configuration file on your code. Which one did you used?

@Whale-ice
Copy link
Owner

Hi,thanks for your interest in my work, I uploaded the new code, the previous code had some problems (I mentioned in the readme), you can try in the new code.
I provided pv_rcnn_ssl_db.yaml , log.txt for 5% ,10% and the split.txt. you can find them in logfile. You can take it as a reference, I didn't set any special parameters.
I will release my log.txt for 1% and 2% as soon as possible (about three weeks as I am currently out of school and cannot connect to the server)

@minju-Kang
Copy link
Author

Thanks! It will be helpful.
Another question, did you include planes data for training?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants