Discussion forum for Fuzzer Developers

[arcuri82]

Hi @Stranger6667 and @en-milie,

thanks for the interest in WFC.

The idea is to have a commonly agreed standard for authentication information (as well as for fault categorization, but that is less important, at least for the time-being).
No much of a standard if only 1 fuzzer implements it. But, if we want to have more fuzzers using it, each fuzzer developer needs to be able to have their saying in the making of the standard.

The current version is working, and we use it inside EvoMaster. But there are more things that need to be added.

From here forward, I would like to have some kind of democratic process in which, when any of us want to make additions to the standard schema, we discuss it here to see if everyone agrees. This is important, as then such changes in the schema will need to be reflected in the implementation of the different fuzzers.

I am open to suggestions on how to best handle this. But, considering now the small number of participants, for now it could be fine to stick with this Discussion forum and PR reviews on GitHub.

Let me know

[en-milie]

Hi @arcuri82. It sounds sensible. I'll focus in the next weeks to go through the authentication standard and see what it takes to implement in in Cats.