-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compare the performance of Java serialization vs Jackson CBOR vs Borer vs Kryo #30
Comments
(rel: sirthias/borer#37) |
Maybe @HubertBalcerzak should do it? Regardless of what I do, this task will remain relevant. |
Makes sense, let's discuss on a call today... |
Here is a comprehensive comparison of different JSON parsers for Scala on different JVMs using different data types and real-world samples (sources). Also the following PR has sources and results of comparison some JSON parsers for Scala with binary parsers for Scala /Java including Java serialization: dkomanov/scala-serialization#8 |
Thanks @plokhotnyuk ! let us take a look... |
@plokhotnyuk is it possible to create a link to plokhotnyuk.github.io/jsoniter-scala/ in a way, to only show specific subset of data? |
@MarconZet As an option you can save it locally and remove unwonted data from A better option would be just running only required benchmarks on your env. and then using JMH Visualizer site to plot charts or compare results. |
Each of Jackson/Borer/Kryo claims to be faster than Java serialization... let's do a simple check (a few million calls of
SerializationTestKit#verify
?) how do they actually compare. Let's consider a few different class objects, with ADTs/Seqs/Maps involved.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: