Map : study explorer similar to clinepi's, based on the All Studies table columns

[bobular]

On qa.restricted.clinepidb.org we have a new meta-study (not a megastudy!)

ClinEpiDB Study Explorer

It would be great to get this working in the map with the sub-studies counts and info panel.

Things that would need doing

• study entity source ID should be EUPATH_0000605 (not OBI_0001628 as present)
• the floating studies panel is currently hardwired to list the study titles, using variable ID OBI_0001622 ("investigation title") (not OBI_0001628 ("investigation identifier") as present)
• check that the link-outs to study pages work, and if not, do client work to fix it
• think about making the panel more generalisable or configurable? Show more columns etc? (there's probably another ticket for this)

[danicahelb]

@bobular the IRIs I used came from classifications.owl, which is used to label columns in the Study Summaries table: https://github.com/VEuPathDB/ApiCommonData/blob/master/Load/ontology/General/study_classifications/classifications.owl

See: https://veupathdb.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TECH/pages/11994114/Create+and+update+study+characteristics+ClinEpiDB

Is there any way to use the existing IRIs & labels to get the sub-study feature working for the vectorBase megastudy? Just trying to think about the best way to harmonize things going forward

[danicahelb]

The ClinEpiDB Study Explorer currently has 2 entities:

1. Studies (EUPATH_0000605)
2. Study Countries (EUPATH_9990007)

study entity source ID should be EUPATH_0000605 (not OBI_0001628 as present)

I think this is what we have? @bobular can you confirm?

• Entity - Studies (EUPATH_0000605)
• Variable - Study name (OBI_0001628)

the floating studies panel is currently hardwired to list the study titles, using variable ID OBI_0001622 (“investigation title”) (not OBI_0001628 (“investigation identifier”) as present)

@bobular can we relabel “Investigation title” to “Study name” on the VectorBase end, but switch the IRI from OBI_0001628 to OBI_0001622 on the ClinEpi end? This would harmonize variable labels & IRIs between the 2 sites

[aurreco-uga]

for my own understanding: we are trying to unify the study entity: