You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by fredrik-bakke March 30, 2024
Since the carrier types are sets the proofs are already irrelevant so it seems reasonable to do this. On the other hand, the performance of the module is not currently a problem.
Note: This should be done as an isolated pull request. There may be some very exceptional instances where we do not want to abstract the proof because it, for instance, is particularly simple and has nice computational behavior, and that is okay.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussed in #1102
Originally posted by fredrik-bakke March 30, 2024
Since the carrier types are sets the proofs are already irrelevant so it seems reasonable to do this. On the other hand, the performance of the module is not currently a problem.
Note: This should be done as an isolated pull request. There may be some very exceptional instances where we do not want to abstract the proof because it, for instance, is particularly simple and has nice computational behavior, and that is okay.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: