Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Perform training on strictly simulated data and evaluate on real XRFI'd data #4

Open
jkerrigan opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@jkerrigan
Copy link
Collaborator

We want to see if a more robust model can be trained that doesn't take into account the XRFI algorithm biases.

@jkerrigan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FCNvsXRFI.pdf
Training on an entirely simulated dataset performs reasonably well and could be improved upon with a much more robust simulated dataset. Additionally the partially flagged channels between freq. channels 800 and 1000 look to be having difficulty predicting to the edges. We may want to attempt padding the input frequency windows but this would obviously lead to a performance hit.

@jkerrigan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jkerrigan commented Nov 13, 2018

predictionexample

Example of prediction comparisons. Orange is True Positives, Red is False Positives, White is False Negatives. Simulated dataset has been improved to some degree by adding additional variation to the bandpass, higher amounts of RFI, and data augmentation. Input carved data has been padded to 68x68 to improve edge prediction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant