-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
newutm.txt
2278 lines (2278 loc) · 780 KB
/
newutm.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
3 Properties of Aggregate Since at least three-quarters of the volume of concrete is occupied by aggregate, it is not surprising that its quality is of considerable importance. Not only may the aggregate limit the strength of concrete, as weak aggregate cannot produce strong concrete, but the properties of aggregate greatly affect the dura
bility and structural performance of concrete. Aggregate was originally viewed as an inert material dispersed throughout the cement paste largely for economic reasons. It is possible, however, to take an opposite view and to look on aggregate as a building material connected into a cohesive whole by means of the cement paste, in a manner sim
ilar to masonry construction. In fact, aggregate is not truly inert and its physical, thermal, and sometimes also chemical properties influence the performance of concrete. Aggregate is cheaper than cement and it is, therefore, economical to put into the mix as much of the former and as little of the latter as possible. But economy is not the
only reason for using aggregate: it confers considerable technical advantages on concrete, which has a higher volume stability and better durability than the cement paste alone. General Classification of Aggregate The size of aggregate used in concrete ranges from tens of millimetres down to particles of the order of a tenth of a mill
imetre in cross-section. The maximum size actually used varies but in any mix particles of different sizes are incorporated, the particle size distribution being referred to as grading. In making low-grade concrete, aggregate from deposits containing a whole range of sizes, from the largest to the smallest, is sometimes used; this is referred
to as all-in or pit-run aggregate. The alternative, very much more common, and always used in the manufacture of good concrete, is to obtain the aggregate in at least two size groups, the division being between fine aggregate, often called sand, not larger 5 mm or 3/6 in., and coarse aggregate, which comprises material at 5 mm or 3/16 in. in s
ize. In the United States, the division is made at No. 4 ASTM sieve, which is 475 mm in size. More will be said about grading later, but this basic division makes it possible to distinguish in the ensuing description between fine and coarse aggregate. It should be noted that the use of the term aggregate (to mean coarse aggregate) in contradis
tinction to sand is not correct, although comparatively common. Sand is generally considered to have a lower size limit of about 0.07 mm or a little less. Material between 0.06 mm and 0.002 mm is classified as silt, and particles smaller still are termed clay. Loam is a soft deposit consisting of sand, silt, and clay in about equal proportion
s. All aggregate particles originally formed a part of a larger parent mass. This may have been fragmented by natural processes of weathering and abrasion or artificially by crushing. Thus many properties of the aggregate depend entirely on the properties of the parent rock, e.g. chemical and mineral composition, petrographic description, spe
cific gravity, hardness, strength, physical and chemical stability, pore structure, colour, etc. On the other hand, there are some properties possessed by the aggregate but absent in the parent rock: particle shape and size, surface texture, and absorption. All these properties may have a considerable influence on the quality of the concrete e
ither fresh or in the hardened state. It is only reasonable to add, however, that, although these different properties of aggregate per se can be examined, it is difficult to define a good aggregate other than by saying that it is an aggregate from which good concrete (for the given conditions) can be made. While aggregate whose properties a
ll appear satisfactory will always make good concrete, the converse is not necessarily true and this is why the criterion of performance in concrete has to be used. In particular, it has been found that aggregate may appear to be unsatisfactory on some count but no trouble need be experienced when it is used in concrete. For instance, a rock s
ample may disrupt on freezing but need not do so when embedded in concrete, especially when the aggregate particles are well covered by a paste of low permeability. However, aggregate considered poor in more than one respect is unlikely to make a satisfactory concrete, so that tests on aggregate alone are of help in assessing its suitability f
or use in concrete. Classification of Natural Aggregates So far, we have considered only aggregate formed from naturally occurring materials, and the present chapter deals almost exclusively with this type of aggregate. Aggregate can, however, also be manufactured from industrial products: since these artificial aggregates are general
ly either heavier or lighter than ordinary aggregate they are considered in Chapter 9. A further distinction can be made between aggregate reduced to its present size by natural agents and crushed aggregate obtained by a deliberate fragmentation of rock. From the petrological standpoint the aggregates, whether crushed or naturally reduced in
size, can be divided into several groups of rocks having common characteristics. The classification of BS 812: Part 1: 1975 is most convenient and is given in Table 3.1. The group classification does not imply suitability of any aggregate for concrete-making: unsuitable material can be found in any group, although some groups tend to have a be
tter record than others. It should also be remembered that many trade and customary names of aggregates are in use, and these often do not correspond to the correct petrographic classificatjjj. Table 3.1: Classificatiii of Natural Aggregates According to Rock Type (BS 812: Part 1: 1975) ASTM Standard C 294-69 (reapproved 1975) gives a de
scription of some of the more common or important minerals found in aggregates. Mineralogical classification is of help in recognizing properties of aggregate but cannot provide a basis for predicting its performance in concrete as there are no minerals universally desirable and few invariably undesirable ones. The ASTM classification is summa
rized below: Silica minerals - (quartz, opal, chalcedony, tridymite, cristobalite) Feldspars Micaceous minerals Carbonate minerals Sulphate minerals Iron sulphide minerals Ferromagnesian minerals Zeolites Iron oxides Clay minerals The details of petrological and mineralogical methods are outside the scope of this book, but i
t is important to realize that geological examination of aggregate is a useful aid in assessing its quality, and, in particular, in comparing a new aggregate with one for which service records are available. Furthermore, adverse properties, such as the presence of some unstable forms of silica, can be detected. In the case of artificial aggreg
ates the influence of manufacturing methods and of processing can also be studied. Artificial Aggregates Artificial aggregates are considered in Chapter 9 because they are lightweight or high-density. One type will, however, be mentioned here because its use arises not from its lightweight properties but because in the United Kingdom and
in many other countries there is a growing shortage of naturally occurring aggregates suitable for use in concrete. The use of artificial aggregates is a natural step towards solving part of this problem, and artificial aggregates manufactured from waste materials would appear to be an even more sensible solution. One such material, currentl
y being developed, is the ash produced from the incinerators used to burn domestic refuse. The ash contains a proportion of both ferrous and non-ferrous metals, both of which can be successfully removed and used again. The remaining residue can be ground to a fine powder, blended with clay, pelletized and fired in a kiln to produce an artifici
al aggregate. Tests to date have shown the material capable of producing a concrete with compressive strengths as high as 50 MPa (7000 psi) at 28 days. There will, obviously, be problems with variations in the composition of the raw ash, and the long-term durability characteristics of the material have yet to be determined, although results
to date look promising. It is not envisaged that this material will be of use in high strength structural concrete; however, it may be suitable for low strength concrete where currently high-grade aggregates, of a quality far superior to that really required, are being used. Previous use of this type of concrete is mentioned on Page 609. S
ampling Tests of various properties of aggregate are perforce performed on samples of the material and, therefore, the results of the tests apply, strictly speaking, to the aggregate in the sample only. Since, however, we are interested in the bulk of the aggregate as supplied or as available for supply we should ensure that the sample is t
ypical of the average properties of the aggregate. Such a sample is said to be representative, and to obtain it certain precautions in procuring the sample have to be observed. No detailed procedures can, however, be laid down because the conditions and situations involved in taking samples in the field can vary widely from case to case. Never
theless, an intelligent experimenter can obtain reliable results if he bears in mind at all times that the sample taken is to be representative of the bulk of the material considered. An instance of such care would be to use a scoop rather than a shovel so as to prevent rolling off of particles of some sizes when the shovel is lifted. This bec
ame recognized in the 1967 revision of BS 812. The main sample is made up of a number of portions drawn from different parts of the whole. The minimum number of these portions, called increments, is ten, and they should add up to a weight not less than that given in Table 3.2 for particles of different sizes, as prescribed by BS 812 : Part 1:
1975. If, however, the source from which the sample is being obtained is variable or segregated, a larger number of increments should be taken and a larger sample ought to be dispatched for testing. This is particularly the case in stockpiles when increments have to be taken from all parts of the pile, not only near its surface but also from t
he centre. Table 3.2: Minimum Weights of Samples for Testing (BS 812: Part 1: 1975) It is clear from Table 3.2 that the main sample may be rather large, particularly when large-size aggregate is used, and so the sample has to be reduced before testing. At all stages of reduction it is necessary to ensure that the representative character
of the sample is retained so that the actual test sample has the same properties as the main sample and ipso facto as the bulk of the aggregate. There are two ways of reducing the size of a sample, each essentially dividing it into two similar parts: quartering and riffling. For quartering, the main sample is thoroughly mixed and in the case
of fine aggregate dampened in order to avoid segregation. The material is heaped into a cone and then turned over to form a new cone. This is repeated twice, the material always being deposited at the apex of the cone so that the fall of particles is evenly distributed round the circumference. The final cone is flattened and divided into quar
ters. One pair of diagonally opposite quarters is discarded, and the remainder forms the sample for testing or, if still too large, can be reduced by further quartering. Care must be taken to include all fine material in the appropriate quarter. As an alternative, the sample can be split into halves using a riffler (Fig. 3.1). This is a box
with a number of parallel vertical divisions, alternate ones discharging to the left and to the right. The sample is discharged into the riffler over its full width, and the two halves are collected into two boxes at the bottom of the chutes on each side. One half is discarded, and riffling of the other half is repeated until the sample is redu
ced to the desired size. BS 812:1975 describes a typical riffler. Fig. 3.1. Riffler Particle Shape and Texture In addition to the petrological character of aggregate, its external characteristics are of importance, in particular the particle shape and surface texture. The shape of three-dimensional bodies is rather difficult to descr
ibe, and it is, therefore, convenient to define certain geometrical characteristics of such bodies. Roundness measures the relative sharpness or angularity of the edges and corners of a particle. Roundness is controlled largely by the strength and abrasion resistance of the parent rock and by the amount of wear to which the particle has been
subjected. In the case of crushed aggregate, the particle shape depends on the nature of the parent material and on the type of crusher and its reduction ratio, i.e. the ratio of the size of material fed into the crusher to the size of the finished product. A convenient broad classification of roundness is that of BS 812 : Part 1 : 1975, given
in Table 3.3. Table 3.3: Particle Shape Classification of BS 812: Part 1: 1975 with Examples A classification sometimes used in the United States is as follows - Well-rounded - no original faces left Rounded - faces almost gone Subrounded - considerable wear, faces reduced in area Subangular - some wear but faces untouched Angular - li
ttle eviden
ween any of the following - (numbers). The figure 67 in the expression for the angularity number represents the solid volume of the most rounded gravel, so that the an
gularity number measures the percentage of voids in excess of that in the rounded gravel (i.e. 33). The higher the number the more angular the aggregate, the range for practical aggregate being between 0 and 11. A development in measurement of angularity of aggregate, both coarse and fine but of single size, is an angularity factor defined as
the ratio of the solid volume of loose aggregate to the solid volume of glass spheres of specified grading; thus no packing is involved and the attendant error is avoided. The usefulness of the test is yet to be determined. The void content of aggregate can be calculated from the change in the volume of air when a known decrease in pressure
is applied; hence, the volume of air, i.e. the volume of interstitial space, can be calculated. An indirect proof of the dependence of the percentage of voids on the shape of particles is obtained from Fig. 3.2, based on Shergold's data. The sample consisted of a mixture of two aggregates, one angular, the other rounded, in varying proportion
s, and it can be seen how increasing proportion of rounded particles decreases the percentage of voids. Fig. 3.2. Influence of angularity of aggregate on voids ratio ' (Crown copyright) Another aspect of the shape of coarse aggregate is its sphericity, defined as a function of the ratio of the surface area of the particle to its volume.
Sphericity is related to the bedding and cleavage of the parent rock, and is influenced by the type of crushing equipment when the size of particles have been artificially reduced. Particles with a high ratio of surface area to volume are of particular interest as they lower the workability of the mix. Elongated and flaky particles are of this
type. The latter can also affect adversely the durability of concrete as they tend to be oriented in one plane, with water and air voids forming underneath. The presence of elongated or flaky particles in excess of 10 to 15 per cent of the weight of coarse aggregate is generally considered undesirable, but no recognized limits are laid down
. The weight of flaky particles expressed as a percentage of the weight of the sample is called the flakiness index. Elongation index is similarly defined. Some particles are both flaky and elongated, and are, therefore, countered in both categories. The classification is made by means of simple gauges described in BS 812: Part 1:1975. The
division is based on the rather arbitrary assumption that a particle is flaky if its thickness (least dimension) is less than 0.6 times the mean sieve size of the size fraction to which the particle belongs. Similarly, a particle whose length (largest dimension) is more than 1.8 times the mean sieve size of the size fraction is said to be elon
gated. The mean size is defined as the arithmetic mean of the sieve size on which the particle is just retained and the sieve size through which the particle just passes. As closer size control is necessary, the sieves considered are not those of the standard concrete aggregate series but: 75.0, 63.0, 50.0, 37.5, 28.0, 20.0, 14.0, 10.0, 6.30 an
d 5.00 mm (or about 3, 21/2, 2, 11/2, 1, 3/4, 1/2, 3/8, 1/4, and 3/16 in.) sieves. The flakiness and elongation tests are useful for general assessment of aggregates but they do not adequately describe the particle shape. The classification of the surface texture is based on the degree to which the particle surfaces are polished or dull, smo
oth or rough; the type of roughness has also to be described. Surface texture depends on the hardness, grain size, and pore characteristics of the parent material (hard, dense and fine-grained rocks generally having smooth fracture surfaces) as well as on the degree to which forces acting on the particle surface have smoothed or roughened it.
Visual estimate of roughness is quite reliable, but in order to reduce misunderstanding the classification of BS 812: Part 1 : 1975, given in Table 3.4, should be followed. There is no recognized method of measuring the surface roughness but Wright's approach is of interest : the interface between the particle and a resin in which it is set is
magnified, and the difference between the length of the profile and the length of an unevenness line drawn as a series of chords is determined. This is taken as a measure of roughness. Reproducible results are obtained, but method is laborious and is not widely used. Table 3.4: Surface Texture of Aggregates (BS 812: Part 1:1975) with Exampl
es A recent attempt is the use of a shape coefficient and a surface texture coefficient evaluated from a Fourier series method which a priori assumes ranges of the harmonic system and also of a modified total roughness coefficient. It is doubtful whether this type of approach is useful in evaluating and comparing the wide range of shapes an
d texture properties encountered in practice Some other approaches are reviewed by Ozol. It seems that the shape and surface texture of aggregate influence considerably the strength of concrete. The flexural strength is more affected than the compressive strength, and the effects of shape and texture are particularly significant in the case
of high strength concrete. Some data of Kaplan's are reproduced in Table 3.5 but this gives no more than an indication of the type of influence, as some other factors may not have been taken into account. The full role of shape and texture of aggregate in the development of concrete strength is not known, but possibly a rougher texture results
in a greater adhesive force between the particles and the cement matrix. Likewise, the larger surface area of angular aggregate means that a larger adhesive force can be developed. Table 3.5: Average Relative Importance of the Aggregate Properties Affecting the Strength of Concrete The shape and texture of fine aggregate have a signific
ant effect on the water requirement of the mix made with the given aggregate. If these properties of fine aggregate are expressed indirectly by its packing, i.e. by the percentage voids in a loose condition (see p. 142), then the influence on the water requirement is quite definite (see Fig. 3.3). The influence of the voids in coarse aggregate
is less definite. Fig. 3.3. Relation between void content of sand in a loose condition and the water requirement of concrete made with the given sand Flakiness and the shape of coarse aggregate in general have an appreciable effect on the workability of concrete. Fig. 3.4, reproduced from Kaplan's paper, shows the pattern of the relat
ion between the angularity of coarse aggregate and the compacting factor of concrete made with it. An increase in angularity from minimum to maximum would reduce the compacting factor by about 0.09 but in practice there can clearly be no unique relation between the two factors as other properties of aggregate also affect the workability. Kapla
n's experimental results, however, do not confirm that the surface texture is a factor. Fig. 3.4. The relation between the angularity number of aggregate and the compacting factor of concrete made with the given aggregate Bond of Aggregate Bond between aggregate and cement paste is an important factor in the strength of concrete, esp
ecially the flexural strength, the full role of bond being only now realized. Bond is due, in part, to the interlocking of the aggregate and the paste owing to the roughness of the surface of the former. A rougher surface, such as that of crushed particles, results in a better bond; better bond is also usually obtained with softer, porous, and
mineralogically heterogeneous particles. Generally, texture characteristics which permit no penetration of the surface of the particles are not conducive to good bond. In addition, bond is affected by other physical and chemical properties of aggregate, related to its mineralogical and chemical composition, and to the electrostatic condition o
f the particle surface. For instance, some chemical bond may exist in the limestone, dolomite, and possibly siliceous aggregates, and at the surface of polished particles some capillary forces may develop. However, little is known about these phenomena, and relying on experience is still necessary in predicting the bond between the aggregate
and the surrounding cement paste The determination of the quality of bond of aggregate is rather difficult and no accepted tests exist. Generally, when bond is good, a crushed concrete specimen should contain some aggregate particles broken right through, in addition to the more numerous ones pulled out from their sockets. An excess of fr
actured particles, however, might suggest that the aggregate is too weak. Because it depends on the paste strength as well as on the properties of aggregate surface, bond strength increases with the age of concrete; it seems that the ratio of bond strength to the strength of the paste increases with age Thus, providing it is adequate, the bond
strength per se may not be a controlling factor in the strength of concrete. However, in high strength concrete there is probably a tendency for the bond strength to be lower than the tensile strength of the cement paste so that preferential failure in bond takes place. The problem of failure of concrete is discussed more fully in Chapter 5.
Strength of Aggregate Clearly, the compressive strength of concrete cannot significantly exceed that of the major part of the aggregate contained therein, although it is not easy to state what is the strength of the individual particles. Indeed, it is difficult to test the crushing strength of the aggregate by itself, and the required inf
ormation has to be obtained usually from indirect tests: crushing strength of prepared rock samples, crushing value of bulk aggregate, and performance of aggregate in concrete. The latter simply means either previous experience with the given aggregate or a trial use of the aggregate in a concrete mix known to have a certain strength with pre
viously proven aggregates. If the aggregate under test leads to a lower compressive strength of concrete, and in particular if numerous individual aggregate particles appear fractured after the concrete specimen has been crushed, then the strength of the aggregate is lower than the nominal compressive strength of the concrete mix in which the
aggregate was incorporated. Clearly, such aggregate can be used only in a concrete of lower strength. This is, for instance, the case with laterite, a material widely spread in Africa, South Asia and South America, which can rarely produce concrete stronger than 10 MPa (1500 psi). Inadequate strength of aggregate represents a limiting case a
s the properties of aggregate have some influence on the strength of concrete even when the aggregate by itself is strong enough not to fracture prematurely. If we compare concretes made with different aggregates we can observe that the influence of aggregate on the strength of concrete is qualitatively the same whatever the mix proportions, a
nd is the same regardless of whether the concrete is tested in compression or in tension. It is possible that the influence of aggregate on the strength of concrete is due not only to the mechanical strength of the aggregate but also, to a considerable degree, to its absorption and bond characteristics. In general, the strength and elasticit
y of aggregate depend on its composition, texture and structure. Thus a low strength may be due to the weakness of constituent grains or the grains may be strong but not well knit or cemented together. The modulus of elasticity of aggregate is rarely determined; this is, however, not unimportant as the modulus of elasticity of concrete is gen
erally higher the higher the modulus of the constituent aggregate, but depends on other factors as well. The modulus of elasticity of aggregate affects also the magnitude of creep and shrinkage that can be realized by the concrete. A good average value of the crushing strength of aggregate is about 200 MPa (30 000 psi) but many excellent agg
regates range in strength down to 80 MPa (12 000 psi). One of the highest values recorded is 530 MPa (77 000 psi) for a certain quartzite. Values for other rocks are in Table 3.6. It should be noted that the required strength of concrete is considerably higher than the normal range of concrete because the actual stresses at the points of contac
t of individual particles within the concrete may be far in excess of the nominal compressive stress applied. Table 3.6: Compressive Strength of American Rocks Commonly Used as Concrete Aggregates On the other hand, aggregate of moderate or low strength and modulus elasticity can be valuable in preserving the durability of concrete. Volu
me changes of concrete, arising from hygral or thermal reasons, lead to a lower stress in the cement paste when the aggregate is compressible. Thus compressibility of aggregate would reduce distress in concrete while a strong and rigid aggregate might lead to cracking of the surrounding cement paste. It may be noted that no general relation ex
ists between the strength and modulus of elasticity of different aggregates. Some granites, for instance, have been found to have a modulus of elasticity of 45 GPa (6.5 x 10'6 psi), and gabbro and diabase a modulus of 85.5 GPa (12.4 x 10'6 psi), the strength of all these rocks ranging between 145 and 170 MPa (21000 to 25 000 psi). Values of th
e modulus in excess of 160 GPa (23 x 10'6 psi) have been encountered. A test to measure the compressive strength of prepared rock cylinders was prescribed by BS 812 : 1967. In this test, a 25.4 mm (1 in.) diameter cylinder 25.4 mm (1 in.) high, is used, and the nominal crushing strength of an oven-dry specimen is determined to the nearest 0.
5 MPa (or 100 psi). The preparation of the sample involves drilling, sawing and grinding - all rather laborious operations The results of the crushing test are affected by the presence of planes of weakness in the rock, and there is, therefore, some doubt about the value of this test, particularly as the structural weakness in the rock may not
be significant once the rock has been comminuted to the size used in concrete. In essence, the crushing strength test measures the quality of the parent rock rather than the quality of the aggregate as used in concrete. For this reason, in 1975, the test was deleted from BS 812, and tests on prepared specimens are nowadays less used than tests
on bulk aggregate, but are nevertheless useful when dealing with a potential new source of crushed aggregate. Sometimes, the strength of a wet as well as of a dry specimen is determined. The ratio of wet to dry strengths measures the softening effect, and when this is high, poor durability of the rock may be suspected. A test on the crushi
ng properties of bulk aggregate is the so-called crushing value test of BS 812: Part 3: 1975. There is no explicit relation between this crushing value and the compressive strength, but the results of the two tests are in agreement (Fig. 3.5). The crushing value is a useful guide when dealing with aggregates of unknown performance, particularl
y when lower strength may be suspected, as for instance with limestone and some granites and basalts. Fig. 3.5. Relation between the compressive strength of the parent rock and the crushing value of aggregate obtained from the same rock The material to be tested should pass a 14.0 mm (1/2 in.) test sieve and be retained on a 10.0 mm (3/8
in.) sieve. When, however, this size is not available, particles of other sizes may be used, but those larger than standard will in general give a higher crushing value, and the smaller ones a lower value than would be obtained with the same rock of standard size. The sample to be tested should be dried in an oven at 100 to 110 C (212 to 230
F) for four hours, and then placed in a cylindrical mould and tamped in a prescribed manner. A plunger is put on top of the aggregate and the whole assembly is placed in a compression testing machine and subjected to a load of 400 kN (40 tons) (pressure of 22.1 MPa (3200 psi)) over the gross area of the plunger, the load being increased gradua
lly over a period of 10 minutes. After the load has been released, the aggregate is removed and sieved on a 2.36 mm (No. 8 ASTM) test sieve in the case of a sample of the 14.0 to 10.0 mm (1/2 to 3/8 in.) standard size; for samples of other sizes, the sieve size is prescribed in BS 812 : Part 3 : 1975. The ratio of the weight of the material pa
ssing this sieve to the total weight of the sample is called the aggregate crushing value. In the United States, where large quantities of artificial lightweight aggregates are used, attempts were made to develop a strength test for these aggregates, rather similar to the crushing value test described above, but no test has been standardized.
The crushing value test is rather insensitive to the variation in strength of weaker aggregates, i.e. those with a crushing value of over 25 to 30. This is so because, having been crushed before the full load of 400 kN (40 tons) has been applied, these weaker materials become compacted so that the amount of crushing during later stages of th
e test is reduced. For this reason, a ten per cent fines va
r honeycombed aggregate (such as expanded shale or foamed slag). These penetrations should result in a percentage of fines
passing a 2.36 mm (No. 8 ASTM) sieve of between 7.5 and 12.5 per cent. If y is the actual percentage of fines due to a maximum load of x tons, then the load required to give 10 per cent fines is given by (formula). It should be noted that in this test, unlike the standard crushing value test, a higher numerical result denotes a higher st
rength of the aggregate. BS 882:1973 prescribes, minimum value of 100 kN (10 tons) for aggregate to be used in concrete wearing surfaces, and 50 kN (5 tons) when used in other concretes. The ten per cent fines value test shows a fairly good correlation with the standard crushing value test for strong aggregates, while for weaker aggregates th
e ten per cent fines value test is more sensitive and gives a truer picture of differences between more or less weak samples. For this reason, the test is of use in assessing light weight aggregates but there is no simple relation between the test result and the upper limit of strength of concrete made with the given aggregate. Other Mech
anical Properties of Aggregate Several mechanical properties of aggregate are of interest, especially when the aggregate is to be used in road construction or is to be subjected to high wear. The first of these is toughness, which can be defined as the resistance of aggregate to failure by impact. Toughness can be determined on prepared cy
lindrical samples of rock: the minimum height from which a standard weight has to be dropped so as to cause failure of the specimen represents the toughness of the material. This test was devised in the days of horse-drawn and steel-tyred traffic, and was abandoned as an ASTM test in 1965, although it would disclose adverse effects of weatheri
ng of the rock under test. It is possible also to determine the impact value of bulk aggregate, and toughness determined in this manner is related to the crushing value, and can, in fact, be used as an alternative test. The size of the particles tested is the same as in the crushing value test and the permissible values of the crushed fractio
n smaller than a 2.36 mm (No. 8 ASTM) test sieve are also the same. The impact is applied by a standard hammer falling 15 times under its own weight upon the aggregate in a cylindrical container. This results in fragmentation in a manner similar to that produced by the pressure of the plunger in the aggregate crushing value test. Full details
of the test are prescribed in BS 812 : Part 3: 1975, and BS 882 : 1973 prescribes the following maximum values of the average of duplicate samples - 30 per cent when the aggregate is to be used in concrete for wearing surfaces, and 45 per cent when to be used in other concretes. These figures serve as useful guides, but it is clear that a di
rect correlation between the crushing value and the performance of aggregate in concrete or the strength of the concrete is not possible. One advantage of the impact test is that it can be performed in the field with some modifications, such as the measurement of quantities by volume rather than by weight, but the test may not be adequate fo
r compliance purposes. In addition to strength and toughness, hardness or resistance to wear is an important property of concrete used in roads and in floor surfaces subjected to heavy traffic. Several tests are available, and it is possible to cause wear by abrasion, i.e. by rubbing of a foreign material against the stone under test, or by a
ttrition of stone particles against one another. In the abrasion (Derry) test, a cylindrical specimen, similar to those used in the crushing strength test, is subjected to wear by quartz (Leighton Buzzard) sand pressed against the cylinder by a rotating metal disc. The abrasion value is expressed as 20 minus one-third of the loss of weight o
f the cylinder in grams. Good stone has an abrasion value of not less than 17; stone with a value of less than 14 would be considered poor. The details of the abrasion test were included in BS 812 up to the 1951 edition. Nowadays the test has gone out of favour both in Britain and in the United States, and, in keeping with the tendency to te
st aggregate in bulk, a new abrasion value test was introduced in BS 812 : 1967. According to BS 812 : Part 3 : 1975, aggregate particles between 14.0 and 10.2 mm are made up in a tray in a single layer, using a setting compound. The sample is subjected to abrasion in a standard machine, the grinding lap being turned 500 revolutions with Leigh
ton Buzzard sand being fed continuously at a prescribed rate. The aggregate abrasion value is defined as the percentage loss in weight on abrasion, so that a high value denotes low resistance to abrasion. The attrition (Deval) test also uses aggregate in bulk. Particles of known total weight are subjected to wear in an iron cylinder rotated
10 000 times at 30 to 33 revolutions per minute. The proportion of broken material expressed as a percentage represents the attrition value. The test can be performed on dry or wet aggregate, and the difference in results indicates the influence of the condition of the aggregate on its resistance to attrition. An attrition value of about 7
to 8 is usually considered as the maximum permissible, but a shortcoming of the test is that it gives only small numerical differences between widely differing aggregates. The test was overed by ASTM Standard D2-33 (reapproved in 1968) but was discontinued in 1971. An American test combining attrition and abrasion is the Los Angeles test;
it is quite frequently used in other countries, too, because its results show good correlation not only with the actual wear of aggregate when used in concrete but also with the compressive and flexural strengths of concrete made with the given aggregate. In this test, aggregate of specified grading is placed in a cylindrical drum, mounted ho
rizontally, with a shelf inside. A charge of steel balls is added, and the drum is rotated a specified number of revolutions. The tumbling and dropping of the aggregate and the balls results in abrasion and attrition of the aggregate, and this is measured in the same way as in the attrition test. The Los Angeles test can be performed on aggr
egates of different sizes, the same wear being obtained by an appropriate weight of the sample and of the charge of steel balls, and by a suitable number of revolutions. The various quantities are prescribed by ASTM Standard C 131-76. The Los Angeles test is, however, not very suitable for the assessment of the behaviour of fine aggregate when
subjected to attrition on prolonged mixing. This problem has only recently been identified; limestone sand is probably one of the more common materials to undergo this degradation. For this reason, unknown fine aggregates should, in addition to standard tests, be subjected to a wet attrition test to see how much material smaller than 75 um (N
o. 200 sieve) is produced. No standard apparatus is available but some development has been made by Meininger. Table 3.7 gives average values of crushing strength, aggregate crushing value, abrasion, impact, and attrition for the different rock groups of BS 812 : Part 2 : 1975. It should be noted that the values for hornfels and schists are b
ased on a few specimens only; these groups would appear to be better than they really are, presumably because only good quality hornfels and schists were tested. As a rule, they are not suitable for use in concrete. Likewise, chalk is not included in the limestone group data as it is not generally suitable as a concrete aggregate. Table 3.7
: Average Test Values for British Rocks of Different Groups As far as the crushing strength is concerned, basalt is extremely variable, fresh basalts with little olivine reaching some 400 MPa (60 000 psi), while decomposed basalt at the other end of the scale may have a strength of no more than 100 MPa (15 000 psi). Limestone and porphyry s
how much less variation in strength, and in Britain porphyry has a good general performance - rather better than that of granites, which tend to be variable. An indication of the accuracy of the results of the different tests is given by Table 3.8, listing the number of samples to be tested in order to ensure a 0.9 probability that the mean
value for the samples is within +/-3 and also within +/-10 per cent of the true mean. The aggregate crushing value shows up as particularly consistent. On the other hand, the prepared specimens show a greater scatter of results than the bulk samples, which is of course to be expected. While the various tests described in this and succeeding se
ctions give an indication of the quality of the aggregate, it is not possible to predict from the properties of aggregate the potential strength development of concrete made with the given aggregate, and indeed it is not yet possible to translate physical properties of aggregate into its concrete-making properties. Table 3.8: Reproducibility
of Test Results on Aggregate Specific Gravity Since aggregate generally contains pores both permeable and impermeable (see p 143), the meaning of the term specific gravity has to be carefully defined, and there are indeed several types of specific gravity. The absolute specific gravity refers to the volume of the solid material exclud
ing all pores, and can, therefore, be defined as the ratio of the weight of the solid, referred to vacuum, to the weight of an equal volume of gas-free distilled water, both taken at a stated temperature. Thus, in order to eliminate the effect of totally enclosed impermeable pores the material has to be pulverized, and the test is both labori
ous and sensitive. Fortunately, it is not normally required in concrete technology work. If the volume of the solid is deemed to include the impermeable pores, but not the capillary ones, the resulting specific gravity is prefixed by the word apparent. The apparent specific gravity is then the ratio of the weight of the aggregate dried in an o
ven at 100 to 110 C (212 to 230 F) for 24 hours to the weight of water occupying a volume equal to that of the solid including the impermeable pores. The latter weight is determined using a vessel which can be accurately filled with water to a specified volume. Thus, if the weight of the oven-dried sample is D, the weight of the vessel full of
water is B, and the weight of the vessel with the sample and topped up with water is A, then the weight of the water occupying the same volume as the solid is B - (A - D). The apparent specific gravity is then (formula). The vessel referred to earlier, and known as a pycnometer, is usually a one-litre jar with a watertight metal conical
screwtop having a small hole at the apex. The pycnometer can thus be filled with water so as to contain precisely the same volume every time. Calculations with reference to concrete are generally based on the saturated surface-dry condition of the aggregate (see p. 146) because the water contained in all the pores in the aggregate does not t
ake part in the chemical reactions of cement and can, therefore, be considered as part of the aggregate. Thus, if a sample of the saturated and surface-dry aggregate weighs C, the gross apparent specific gravity is (formula). This is the specific gravity most frequently and easily determined and necessary for calculations of yield of con
crete or of the quantity of aggregate required for a given volume of concrete. The apparent specific gravity of aggregate depends on the specific gravity of the minerals of which the aggregate is composed and also on the amount of voids. The majority of natural aggregates have a specific gravity of between 2.6 and 2.7, and the range of value
s is given in Table 3.9. The values for artificial aggregates extend from considerably below to very much above this range (see Chapter 9). Table 3.9: Apparent Specific Gravities of Different Rock Groups As mentioned earlier, specific gravity of aggregate is used in the calculation of quantities but the actual value of the specific gravit
y of aggregate is not a measure of its quality. Thus the value of specific gravity should not be specified unless we are dealing with a material of a given petrological character when a variation in specific gravity would reflect the porosity of the particles. An exception to this is the case of mass construction, such as a gravity dam, where
a minimum density of concrete is essential for the stability of the structure. Bulk Density It is well known that in the metric system the density of a material is numerically equal to its specific gravity although, of course, the latter is a ratio while density is expressed in kilogrammes per litre. However, in concrete practice,
expressing the density in kilogrammes per cubic metre is more common. In the Imperial system, specific gravity has to be multiplied by the unit weight of water (approximately 624 lb / ft3) in order to be converted into absolute density (specific weight) expressed in pounds per cubic foot. This absolute density, it must be remembered, refer
s to the volume of the individual particles only, and of course it is not physically possible to pack these particles so that there are no voids between them. When aggregate is to be actually batched by volume it is necessary to know the weight of aggregate that would fill a container of unit volume. This is known as the bulk density of aggreg
ate, and this density is used to convert quantities by weight to quantities by volume. The bulk density clearly depends on how densely the aggregate is packed, and it follows that for a material of a given specific gravity the bulk density depends on the size distribution and shape of the particles: particles all of one size can be packed to
a limited extent but smaller particles can be added in the voids between the larger ones, thus increasing the bulk density of the packed material. The shape of the particles greatly affects the closeness of packing that can be achieved. For a coarse aggregate of given specific gravity, a higher bulk density means that there are fewer voids t
o be filled by sand and cement, and the bulk density test has at one time been used as a basis of proportioning of mixes. The actual bulk density of aggregate depends not only on the various characteristics of the material which determine the potential degree of packing, but also on the actual compaction achieved in a given case. For instance
, using spherical particles all of the same size, the densest packing is achieved when their centres lie at the apexes of imaginary tetrahedra. The bulk density is then 0.74 of the specific weight of the material. For the loosest packing, the centres of spheres are at the corners of imaginary cubes and the bulk density is only 0.52 of the spec
ific weight of the solid. Thus, for test purposes, the degree of compaction has to be specified. BS 812 : Part 2 : 1975 recognizes two degrees: loose (or uncompacted) and compacted. The test is performed in a metal cylinder of prescribed diameter and depth, depending on the maximum size of the aggregate and also on whether compacted or uncomp
acted bulk density is being determined. For the determination of loose bulk density, the dried aggregate is gently placed in the container to overflowing and then levelled by rolling a rod across the top. In order to find the compacted or rodded bulk density, the container is filled in three stages, each third of the volume being tamped a p
rescribed number of times with a 16 mm (5/8 in.) diameter round-nosed rod. Again, the overflow is removed. The net weight of the aggregate in the container divided by its volume then represents the bulk density for either degree of compaction. The ratio of the loose bulk density to the compacted bulk density lies usually between 0.87 and 0.96.
Knowing the apparent specific gravity for the saturated and surface-dry condition, Q, the voids ratio can be calculated from the expression (formula). If the aggregate contains surface water it will pack less densely owing to the bulking effect. This is discussed on p. 148. Moreover, the bulk density as determined in the laboratory may n
ot be directly suitable for conversion of weight to volume of aggregate for purposes of volume batching as the degree of compaction in the laboratory and on the site may not be the same. The bulk density of aggregate is of interest in connection with the use of lightweight and heavy aggregates (see Chapter 9). Porosity and Absorption of
Aggregate The presence of internal pores in the aggregate particles was mentioned in connection with the specific gravity of aggregate, and indeed the characteristics of these pores are very important in the study of its properties. The porosity of aggregate, its permeability, and absorption, influence such properties of aggregate as the bo
nd between it and the cement paste, the resistance of concrete to freezing and thawing, as well as its chemical stability and resistance to abrasion. As stated earlier, the apparent specific gravity of aggregate also depends on its porosity and, as a consequence, the yield of concrete for a given weight of aggregate is affected. The pores in
aggregate vary in size over a wide range, the largest being large enough to be seen under a microscope or even with the naked eye, but even the smallest aggregate pores are generally larger than the gel pores in the cement paste. Pores smaller than 4 um are of special interest as they are generally believed to affect the durability of aggregat
es subjected to alternating freezing and thawing (see p. 464). Some of the aggregate pores are wholly within the solid; others open onto the surface of the particle. The cement paste, because of its viscosity, cannot penetrate to a great depth any but the largest of the aggregate pores, so that it is the gross volume of the particle that is c
onsidered solid for the purpose of calculating the aggregate content in concrete. However, water can enter the pores, the amount and rate of penetration depending on their size, continuity and total volume. The order of porosity of some common rocks is given in Table 3.10, and since aggregate represents some three-quarters of the volume of con
crete it is clear that the porosity of aggregate materially contributes to the overall porosity of concrete. Table 3.10: Porosity of some Common Rocks When all the pores in the aggregate are full it is said to be saturated and surface-dry. If aggregate in this condition is allowed to stand free in dry air, e.g. in the laboratory, some of
the water contained in the pores will evaporate and the aggregate will be less than saturated, i.e. air-dry. Prolonged drying in an oven would reduce the moisture content of the aggregate still further until, when no moisture whatever is left, the aggregate is said to be bone-dry. These various stages are shown diagrammatically in Fig. 3.6, a
nd some typical values of absorption are given in Table 3.11. At the extreme right of Fig. 3.6, the aggregate contains surface moisture and is darker in colour. Table 3.11: Typical Values of Absorption of Different Aggregates Fig. 3.6. Diagrammatic representation of moisture in aggregate The water absorption of aggregate is determined
by measuring the increase in weight of an oven-dried sample when immersed in water for 24 hours (the surface water being removed). The ratio of the increase in weight to the weight of the dry sample, expressed as a percentage, is termed absorption. Standard procedures are prescribed in BS 812 : Part 2 : 1975. Some typical values of absorptio
n of different aggregates are given in Table 3.11, based on Newman's data. The moisture content in the air-dry condition is also tabulated. It may be noted that gravel has generally a higher absorption than crushed rock of the same petrological character since weathering results in the outer layer of the gravel particles being more porous and
absorbent. Although there is no clear-cut relation between the strength of concrete and the water absorption of aggregate used, the pores at the surface of the particle affect the bond between the aggregate and the cement paste, and may thus exert some influence on the strength of concrete. Normally, it is assumed that at the time of settin
g of concrete the aggregate is in a saturated and surface-dry condition. If the aggregate is batched in a dry condition it is assumed that sufficient water will be absorbed from the mix to bring the aggregate to a saturated condition, and this absorbed water is not included in the net or effective mixing water. It is possible, however, that wh
en dry aggregate is used the particles become quickly coated with cement paste which prevents further ingress of water necessary for saturation. This is particularly so with coarse aggregate, where water has further to travel from the surface of the particle. As a result, the effective water / cement ratio is higher than would be the case had
full absorption of water by the aggregate been possible. This effect is significant mainly in rich mixes where rapid coating of aggregate can take place; in lean, wet mixes the saturation of aggregate proceeds undisturbed. In practical cases the actual behaviour of the mix is affected also by the order of feeding the ingredients into the mixer
. The absorption of water by aggregate results also in some loss of workability with time, but beyond about 15 minutes the loss becomes small . Since absorption of water by dry aggregate slows down or is stopped owing to the coating of particles with cement paste, it is often useful to determine the quantity of water absorbed in 10 to 30 mi
nutes instead of the total water absorption, which may never be achieved in practice. Moisture Content of Aggregate It was mentioned in connection with the specific gravity that in fresh concrete the volume occupied by the aggregate is the volume of the particles including all the pores. If no water movement into the aggregate is to tak
e place the pores must be full of water, i.e. the aggregate must be in a saturated condition. On the other hand, any water on the surface of the aggregate will contribute to the water in the mix and will occupy a volume in excess of that of the aggregate particles. The basic state of the aggregate is then saturated and surface-dry. Aggregate
exposed to rain collects a considerable amount of moisture on the surface of the particles, and, except at the surface of the stockpile, keeps this moisture over long periods. This is particularly true of fine aggregate, and the surface or free moisture (in excess of that held by aggregate in a saturated and surface-dry condition) must be all
owed for in the calculation of batch quantities. The surface moisture is expressed as a percentage of the weight of the saturated and surface-dry aggregate, and is termed the moisture content. Since absorption represents the water contained in aggregate in a saturated and surface-dry condition, and the moisture content is the water in excess
of that state, the total water content of a moist aggregate is equal to the sum of absorption and moisture content. As the moisture content of aggregate changes with weather and changes also from one part of a stockpile to another, the value of the moisture content has to be determined frequently and a number of methods have been developed.
The oldest one consists simply of finding the loss in weight of an aggregate sample when dried on a tray over a source of heat. Care is necessary to avoid over-drying: the sand should be brought to a just free-flowing condition, and must not be heated further. This stage can be determined by feel or by forming the sand into a pile by means of
a conical mould; when the mould has been removed the material should slump freely. If the sand has acquired a brownish tinge, this is a sure sign that excessive drying has taken place. This method of determining the moisture content of aggregate, colloquially referred to as the "frying-pan method" is simple, can be used in the field and is qui
te reliable. In the laboratory the moisture content of aggregate can be determined by means of a pycnometer. The apparent specific gravity of the aggregate on a saturated and surface-dry basis, Q, must be known. Then, if B is the weight of the pycnometer full of water, C the weight of the moist sample and A the weight of the pycnometer with t
he sample and topped up with water, the moisture content of the aggregate is (formula). The test is slow and requires great care in execution (e.g. all air must be expelled from the sample) but can yield accurate results. In the siphon can test the volume of water displaced by a known weight of moist aggregate is measured, the siphon m
aking this determination more accurate. Preliminary calibration for each aggregate is required as the results depend on its specific gravity but, once this has been done, the test is rapid and accurate. The moisture content of aggregate can also be found using a steelyard moisture meter: the moist aggregate is added to a vessel containing a f
ixed amount of water and suspended at one end of a steelyard until it balances. We measure thus the quantity of water that has to be replaced by the moist aggregate for a constant weight and total volume. For this condition it can be shown that the amount of displaced water is proportional to the moisture content of the aggregate. A calibratio
n curve for any aggregate used has to be obtained. The moisture content can be determined with an accuracy of 1/2 per cent. In the buoyancy meter test the moisture content of the aggregate of known specific gravity is determined from the apparent loss in weight on immersion in water. The balance can read the moisture content directly if the
size of the sample is adjusted, according to the specific gravity of the aggregate, to such a value that a saturated and surface-dry sample has a standard weight when immersed. The test is rapid and gives the moisture content to the nearest 1/2 per cent. A simple version of the test is prescribed by ASTM Standard C 70-79. Numerous other meth
ods have been developed. For instance, moisture can be removed by burning the aggregate with methyl alcohol, the resulting loss in weight of the sample being measured. There are also proprietary meters based on the measurement of pressure of gas formed in a closed vessel by the reaction of calcium carbide with the moisture in the sample. Ele
ctrical devices which give instantaneous or continuous reading of the moisture content of aggregate in a storage bin, on the basis of the variation of resistance or capacitance with a change in the moisture content of the aggregate, have been developed. In some batching plants, meters of this type are used in automatic devices which regulate t
he quantity of water to be added to the mixer but an accuracy greater than 1 per cent of moisture cannot in practice be achieved. Microwave meters have recently been developed but these are very expensive. It can be seen that a great variety of tests is available but, however accurate the test, its result is significant only if a representati
ve sample has been used. Furthermore, if the moisture content of aggregate varies between adjacent parts of a stockpile, the adjustment of mix proportions becomes laborious. Since the variation in moisture content occurs mainly in the vertical direction from a water-logged bottom of a pile to its drying or dry surface, care in laying out of st
ockpiles is necessary: storing in horizontal layers, having at least two stockpiles and allowing each pile to drain before use, and not using the bottom 300 mm (12 in.) or so, all help to keep the variation in moisture content to a minimum. Coarse aggregate holds very much less water than sand, has a less variable moisture content, and genera
lly causes fewer difficulties. Bulking of Sand The presence of moisture in aggregate necessitates correction of the actual mix proportions: the weight of water added to the mix has to be decreased by the weight of the free moisture in the aggregate, and the weight of the aggregate must be increased by a like amount. In the case of sand,
there is a second effect of the presence of moisture: bulking. This is the increase in the volume of a given weight of sand caused by the films of water pushing the sand particles apart. While bulking per se does not affect the proportioning of materials by weight, in the case of volume batching, bulking results in a smaller weight of sand oc
cupying the fixed volume of the measuring box. For this reason, the mix becomes deficient in sand and appears "stony", and the concrete may be prone to segregation and honeycombing. Also, the yield of concrete is reduced. The remedy, of course, lies in increasing the apparent volume of sand to allow for bulking. The extent of bulking depends
on the percentage of moisture present in the sand and on its fineness. The increase in volume relative to that occupied by a saturated and surface-dry sand increases with an increase in the moisture content of the sand up to a value of some 5 to 8 per cent, when bulking of 20 to 30 per cent occurs. Upon further addition of water, the films mer
ge and the water moves into the voids between the particles so that the total volume of sand decreases until, when fully saturated (flooded), its volume is approximately the same as the volume of dry sand for the same method of filling the container. This is apparent from Fig. 3.7, which also shows that finer sand bulks considerably more and r
eaches maximum bulking at a higher water content than does coarse sand. Extremely fine sand has been known to bulk as much as 40 per cent at a moisture content of 10 per cent, but such a sand is in any case unsuitable for the manufacture of good quality concrete. Fig. 3.7. Decrease in true volume of sand due to bulking (for a constant volume
of moist sand) Coarse aggregate shows only a negligible increase in volume due to the presence of free water, as the thickness of moisture films is very small compared with the particle size. Since the volume of saturated sand is the same as that of dry sand, the most convenient way of determining bulking is by measuring the decrease in v
olume of the given sand when inundated. A container of known volume is filled with loosely packed moist sand. The sand is then tipped out, the container is partially filled with water and the sand is gradually fed back, with stirring and rodding to expel all air bubbles. The volume of sand in the saturated state, Vs is now measured. If Vm, is
the initial volume of the sand (i.e. the volume of the container), then bulking is given by - (formula). With volume batching, bulking has to be allowed for by increasing the total volume of (moist) sand used. Thus volume Vs is multiplied by a factor - (formula), sometimes known as the bulking factor, and a graph of bulking factor ag
ainst moisture of three typical sands is shown in Fig. 3.8. Fig. 3.8. Bulking factor for sands with different moisture contents The bulking factor can also be found from the bulk density of dry and moist sand, Dd and Dm respectively, and the moisture content per unit volume of sand, m / Vm. The bulking factor is then - (formula).
Since Dd represents a ratio of the weight of dry sand, w , to its bulk volume Vs (the volume of dry and inundated sand being the same) - (formula), i.e. the two factors are identical. Deleterious Substances in Aggregate There are three broad categories of deleterious substances that may be found in aggregates: impurities which inte
rfere with the process of hydration of cement; coatings preventing the development of good bond between aggregate and the cement paste; and certain individual particles which are weak or unsound in themselves. All or part of an aggregate can also be harmful through the development of chemical reactions between the aggregate and the cement past
e: these chemical reactions are discussed on page 158. Organic Impurities Natural aggregates may be sufficiently strong and resistant to wear and yet they may not be satisfactory for concrete-making if they contain organic impurities which interfere with the chemical reactions of hydration. The organic matter found in aggregate consists
usually of products of decay of vegetable matter (mainly tannic acid and its derivative) and appears in the form of humus or organic loam. Such materials are more likely to be present in sand than in coarse aggregate, which is easily washed. Not all organic matter is harmful and it is best to check its effects by making actual test cubes. Gen
erally, however, it saves time to ascertain first whether the amount of organic matter is sufficient to warrant further tests. This is done by the so-called colorimetric test of ASTM Standard C 40-73. The acids in the sample are neutralised by a 3 % solution of NaOH, prescribed quantities of aggregate and of solution being placed in a bottle. T
he mixture is vigorously shaken to allow the intimate contact necessary for chemical action, and then left to stand for 24 hours, when the organic content can be judged by the colour of the solution: the greater the organic content the darker the colour. If the colour of the liquid above the test sample is not darker then the standard yellow c
olour defined by the standard, the sample can be assumed to contain only a harmless amount of organic impurities. If the observed colour is darker than the standard, i.e. if the solution appears brownish or brown, the aggregate has a rather high organic content, but this does not necessarily mean that the aggregate is not fit for use in conc
rete. The organic matter present may not be harmful to concrete or the colour may be due to some iron-bearing minerals. For this reason, further tests are necessary: concrete cubes are made using the suspected aggregates and their strength is compared with concrete of the same mix proportion but made with aggregates of known quality. In earl
ier edition, BS 812 contained the colorimetric tests, but in 1967 there was introduced a measurement of the pH values of cement mortars under standard conditions. The test is rather laborious and is suitable for laboratory work only, and was deleted from BS 812 in 1975. In consequence, at present the calorimetric test is the best means for a p
reliminary assessment of suitability of aggregates: If no colour change in excess of that specified is observed, no further tests are necessary unless contamination with industrial affluence has occurred. In some countries the quantity of organic matter in aggregate is determined from the loss of weight of a sample on treating with hydrogen p
eroxide. It is interesting to note that in some cases the effects of organic impurities may be only temporary. In one investigation concrete made with a sand containing organic matter had a 24-hour strength equal to 53 per cent of the strength of similar concrete made with clean sand. At 3 days this ratio rose to 82 per cent, then to 92 per c
ent at 7 days, and at 28 days equal strengths were recorded. Clay and Other Fine Material Clay may be present in aggregate in the form of surface coatings which interfere with the bond between aggregate and the cement paste. Since good bond is essential to ensure a satisfactory strength and durability of concrete the problem of clay coati
ng is an important one. There are two more types of fine material which can be present in aggregate: silt and crusher dust. Silt is a material between 2 um and 60 um, reduced to this size by natural processes of weathering; silt may thus be found in aggregate won from natural deposits. On the other hand crusher dust is a fine material formed
during the process of comminution of rock into crushed stone or, less frequently of gravel into crushed sand. In a properly laid out processing plant this dust should be removed by washing. Other soft or loosely adhering coatings can be removed during the processing of the aggregate. Well-bonded coatings cannot be so removed, but if they a
re chemically stable and have no deleterious effect there is no objection to the use of aggregate with such a coating although shrinkage may be increased. However, aggregates with chemically reactive coatings, even if physically stable, can lead to serious trouble. Silt and fine dust may form coatings similar to those of clay, or may be pre
sent in the form of loose particles not bonded to the course aggregate. Even when they are in the latter form, silt and fine dust should not be present in excessive quantities because, owing to their fineness and therefore large surface area, silt and fine dust increase the amount of water necessary to wet all the particles in the mix. In vi
ew of the above, it is necessary to control the clay, silt and fine dust contents of aggregate. BS 882 : 1973 limits the content of all three materials together to not more than - 15 per cent by weight in crushed stone sand, 3 per cent by weight in natural or crushed gravel sand, and 1 per cent by weight in coarse aggregate. ASTM stand
ard C 33-78 lays down similar requirements, but distinguishes between concrete subject to abrasion and other concretes. In the former case, the amount material passing a 75 um (No. 200) test sieve is limited to 3 per cent of the weight of sand, instead of the 5 per cent value permitted for other concretes. The corresponding for coarse aggrega
te is laid down as 1 per cent. In the same standard, the content of clay and friable particles is specified separately as 3 per cent in fine and 2 to 10 per cent in coarse aggregate, depending on the use of the concrete. It may be noted that different test methods are prescribed in different specifications so that the results are not direct
ly comparable. The clay, silt and fine dust content of fine aggregate can be determined by the sedimentation method described in BS 812 : Part 1 : 1975. The sand sample is placed in a sodium oxalate solution in a stoppered jar and rotated with the axis of the jar horizontal for 15 minutes at approximately 80 revolutions per minute. The fine s
olids become dispersed and the amount of suspended material is then measured by means of an Andreason pipette. A simple calculation gives the percentage of clay, fine silt and fine dust in the sand, the separation size being 20 um. A similar method, with suitable modifications can be used for coarse aggregate, but it is simpler to wet-sieve
the aggregate on a 75 um (No. 200) test sieve, as prescribed in BS 812 : Part 1 : 1975 and ASTM Standard C 117 - 76. This type of sieving is resorted to because fine dust and clay adhering to larger particles would not be separated in ordinary dry sieving. In wet sieving, on the other hand, the aggregate is placed in water and agitated suffici
ently vigorously for the finer material to be brought into suspension. By decantation and sieving, all material smaller than a 75 um (No. 200) test sieve can be removed. To protect this sieve from damage by large particles during decantation a 1.18 mm (No. 16 ASTM) sieve is placed above the 75 um (No. 200) sieve. For natural sands and crushed
gravel sands, there is also a field test available which can be performed quite easily and rapidly, with very little laboratory equipment. 50 ml of an approximately 1 per cent solution of common salt in water is place in a 250 ml BS measuring cylinder. Sand, as received , is added until the total volume of the mixture in the cylinder is 150
ml. The cylinder is now covered with the palm of the hand, shaken vigorously, repeatedly turned upside down and then allowed to stand for 3 hours. The silt which became dispersed on shaking will now settle in a layer above the sand, and the height of this layer can be expressed as a percentage of the height of the sand below. It should be rem
embered that this a volumetric ratio, which cannot easily be converted to a ratio by weight since the conversion factor depends on the fineness of the material. It has been suggested that for natural sand the weight ratio is obtained by multiplying the volumetric ratio by a factor of 1/4, the corresponding figure for crushed gravel sand being
1/2, but with some aggregate an even wider variation is obtained. These conversions are not reliable, and BS 882 : 1973 recommends that the volumetric content exceeds 8 per cent tests by the more accurate methods, described earlier, should be made. Salt Contamination Sand won from the seashore or from a river estuary contains salt, and has
to be processed; more than 10 per cent aggregate used in Britain is of marine origin. The simplest course is to wash the sand in fresh water, but special care is required with deposits just above the high-water mark in which large quantities of salt, sometimes over 6 per cent of weight of sand, may be found. Generally, sand from the sea bed,
washed even in sea water, does not contain harmful quantities of salts. The British Code of Practice for the Structural Use of Concrete CP 110 : 1972 specifies the maximum total chloride and all other sources (see p. 106). It is fair to add that it is not the total chloride content in aggregate that matters in practice, but rather the soluble
chloride, or even the degree to which the soluble chloride reacts during the hydration of cement. In consequent, if the situation is such that the use of an aggregate with an excessive chloride content is economically desirable, tests should be made to determine its suitability; of course, compliance with CP 110 : 1972 cannot be claimed in su
ch a case. If salt is not removed it will absorb moisture from the air and cause efflorescence - unsightly white deposits on the surface of the concrete (see also p. 455). A slight corrosion of reinforcement may also result, but this is not believed to progress to a dangerous degree, especially when the concrete is of good quality and adequa
te cover to reinforcement is provided. No trouble need be expected in mass concrete structures. Special problems arising from the presence of various salts in aggregates found in arid region, such as the Middle East are treated by Fookes and Collis. Sea sands are often extremely fine and the grading of any new sand should be carefully check
ed. Sea-dredged coarse aggregate may have a large shell content. This has no adverse effect on strength but workability in concrete made with aggregate having a large shell content is slightly reduced. The shell content of particles larger than 5 mm can be determined by hand picking, using the method of an amendment of the British Standard B
S 812 : Part 2: 1975. Unsound Particles Test on aggregate sometimes reveal that the majority of the component particles are satisfactory but that a few are unsound: the quantity of such particles must clearly be limited. There are two broad types of unsound particles: those that fail to maintain their integrity, and those that lead to d
isruptive expansion on freezing or even exposure to water. The disruptive properties are characteristics of certain rock groups, and will therefore be discussed in relation to the durability of aggregate in general (mainly in the next section). In this section, non-durable impurities only will be considered. Shale and other particles of low
density are regarded as unsound and so are soft inclusions such as clay lumps, wood, and coal, as they lead to pitting and scaling. If present in large quantity (over 2 to 5 per cent of the weight of the aggregate) these particles may adversely affect the strength of concrete and should certainly not be permitted in concrete which is exposed
to abrasion. Coal, in addition to being a soft inclusion, is undesirable for other reasons: it can swell, causing disruption of concrete and, if present in large quantities in a finely divided form, it can disturb the process of hardening of the cement paste. However, discrete particles of hard coal amounting to no more a 1/4 per cent of the
weight of the aggregate have no adverse effect on the strength of concrete. The presence of coal and other materials of low density can be determined by flotation in a liquid of suitable specific gravity, as, for instance, by the method of ASTM Standard C 123 - 69 (reapproved 1975). If the danger of pitting and scaling is not thought importan
t, and strength of concrete is the main consideration, a trial mix should be made. Mica should be avoided because in the presence of active chemical agents produced during the hydration of cement, alteration of mica to other forms may result. Also, free mica in fine aggregate, even in quantities of a few per cent of the weight of the aggregat
e affects adversely the water requirement and hence the strength of concrete. It appears that mica in the form of muscovite is much more harmful than biotite. These facts should be borne in mind when materials such as china clay sand are considered for use in concrete. Gypsum and other sulphates must not be present; their existence in many Mi
ddle East aggregates leads to difficulties, but up to 5 per cent of SO3 by weight of cement (including that in the cement) is often tolerated there. Iron pyrites and marcasite represent the most common expansive inclusions in aggregate. These sulphides react with water and oxygen in the air to form a ferrous sulphate which subsequently de
composes to form the hydroxide, while the sulphate ions react with calcium aluminates in the cement. Surface staining of the concrete and disruption of the cement paste (pop-outs) may result, particularly under warm and humid conditions. Not all pyrites are reactive but, since the decomposition of pyrites takes place only in lime water, it
is possible to test a suspect aggregate for reactivity by placing the material in a saturated solution of lime. If the aggregate is reactive a blue-green gelatinous precipitate of ferrous sulphate appears within a few minutes, and on exposure to air this changes to brown ferric hydroxide. The absence of this reaction means that no staining ne
ed be feared. Lack of reactivity was found by Midgley to be associated with the presence of a number of metal cations, while their absence makes the pyrites active. Generally, particles of pyrites likely to cause trouble are those between 5 and 10 mm (or 3/16 and 3/8 in.) in size. The permissible quantities of unsound particles laid down by A
STM Standard C 33-78 are summarized in Table 3.12. Table 3.12 Permissible Quantities of Unsound Particles Prescribed by ASTM Standard C 33-78 The majority of impurities discussed in the present section are found in natural aggregate deposits and are much less frequently encountered in crushed aggregate. However, some processed aggregates
, such as mine tailings, can contain harmful substances. For instance, small quantities of lead soluble in limewater (e.g. 0.1 per cent of PbO by weight of aggregate) greatly delay the set and reduce the early strength of concrete; the long-term strength is unaffected. Soundness of Aggregate This is the name given to the ability of aggr
egate to resist excessive changes in volume as a result of changes in physical conditions. Lack of soundness is thus distinct from expansion caused by the chemical reactions between the aggregate and the alkalis in cement. The physical causes of large or permanent volume changes of aggregate are freezing and thawing, thermal changes at tempe
ratures above freezing, and alternating wetting and drying. Aggregate is said to be unsound when volume changes, induced by the above causes, result in deterioration of the concrete. This may range from local scaling and so-called pop-outs to extensive surface cracking and to disintegration over a considerable depth, and can thus vary from n
o more than impaired appearance to a structurally dangerous situation. Unsoundness is exhibited by porous flints and cherts, especially the lightweight ones with a fine-textured pore structure, by some shales, by limestones with laminae of expansive clay, and by other particles containing clay minerals, particularly of the montmorillonite or
illite group. For instance, an altered dolerite has been found to move as much as 0.0006 with wetting and drying, and concrete containing this aggregate might fail under conditions of alternating wetting and drying, and will certainly do so on freezing and thawing. A test for soundness of aggregate is prescribed by the ASTM Standard C 88-76.
A sample of graded aggregate is subjected alternately to immersion in a saturated solution of sodium or magnesium sulphate (generally the more severe of the two) and drying in an oven. The formation of salt crystals in the pores of the aggregate tends to disrupt the particles, probably in a manner similar to the action of ice. The reduction i
n size of the particles, as shown by a sieve analysis, after a number of cycles of exposure denotes the degree of unsoundness. The test is no more than qualitative in predicting the behaviour of the aggregate under actual site conditions, and cannot be used as a basis of acceptance or rejection of unknown aggregates. Specifically, there is no
clear reason why soundness as tested by ASTM Standard C 88-76 should be related to performance in concrete subjected to freezing and thawing. Other tests consist of subjecting the aggregate to cycles of alternating freezing and thawing, and sometimes this treatment is applied to mortar or concrete made with the suspect aggregate. Unfortunate
ly, none of the tests gives an accurate indication of the behaviour of aggregate under actual conditions of moisture and temperature changes above the freezing point. Likewise, there are no tests which could satisfactorily predict the durability of aggregate in the concrete under conditions of freezing and thawing. The main reason for this is
that the behaviour of aggregate is related to the presence of the surrounding cement paste, so that only a service record can satisfactorily prove the durability of aggregate. Nevertheless, certain aggregates are known to be susceptible to frost damage and it is on these that our attention is centred. These are: porous cherts. shales. limest
ones, particularly laminated limestones, and some sandstones. A common characteristic of these rocks with a poor record is their high absorption, but it should be emphasized that many durable rocks also exhibit high absorption (see Fig. 3.9). Fig. 3.9. Distribution of sound and unsound aggregate samples as a function of absorption For fr
ost damage to occur there must exist critical conditions of water content and lack of drainage. These are governed, inter alia, by the size, shape and continuity of pores in the aggregate, because these characteristics of the pores control the rate and amount of absorption and the rate at which water can escape from the aggregate particle. Inde
ed, these features of the pores are more important than merely their total volume as reflected by the magnitude of absorption. It has been found that pores smaller than 4 to 5 um are critical, for they are large enough to permit water to enter but not large enough to allow easy drainage under the pressure of ice. This pressure, in fully conf
ined space at -20 C (-4 F), may be as high as 200 MPa (29 000 psi). Thus, if splitting of aggregate particles and disruption of the surrounding cement paste are to be avoided, flow of water towards unfilled pores within the aggregate particle or into the surrounding paste must be possible before the hydraulic pressure becomes high enough to ca
use disruption. This argument illustrates the statement made earlier that the durability of aggregate cannot be fully determined other than when it is embedded in cement paste: the particle may be strong enough to resist the pressure of ice but expansion may cause disruption of the surrounding mortar. It has been said that the pore size is
an important factor in the durability of aggregate. In most aggregates, pores of different sizes are present so that we are really confronted with a pore size distribution. A means of expressing this quantitatively has been developed by Brunauer, Emmett and Teller. The specific surface of the aggregate is determined from the amount of a gas so
rbate required to form a layer one molecule thick over the entire internal surface of the aggregate pores. The total volume of the pores is measured by absorption, and the ratio of the volume of pores to their surface represents the hydraulic radius of the pores. This value, familiar from flow problems in hydraulics, gives an indication of the
pressure required to produce flow. Alkali - aggregate Reaction During the last forty years, some deleterious chemical reactions between the aggregate and the surrounding cement paste have been observed. The most common reaction is that between the active silica constituents of the aggregate and the alkalis in cement. The reactive forms
of silica are opal (amorphous), chalcedony (cryptocrystalline fibrous), and tridymite (crystalline). These reactive materials occur in: opaline or chalcedonic cherts, siliceous limestones, rhyolites and rhyolitic tuffs, dacite and dacite tuffs, andesite and andesite tuffs, and phyllites. The reaction starts with the attack on the siliceous m
inerals in the aggregate by the alkaline hydroxides derived from the alkalis (Na2O and K2O) in the cement. As a result, an alkali-silicate gel is formed, and alteration of the borders of the aggregate takes place. The gel is of the "unlimited swelling" type: it imbibes water with a consequent tendency to increase in volume. Since the gel is co
nfined by the surrounding cement paste, internal pressures result and eventually lead to expansion, cracking and disruption of the cement paste (pop-outs). Thus expansion appears to be due to hydraulic pressure generated through osmosis, but expansion can also be caused by the swelling pressure of the still solid products of the alkali - silic
a reaction. For this reason, it is believed that it is the swelling of the hard aggregate particles that is most harmful to concrete. Some of the relatively soft gel is later leached out by water and deposited in the cracks already formed by the swelling of the aggregate. The size of the siliceous particles controls the speed with which reactio
n occurs, fine particles (20 to 30 um) leading to expansion within a month or two, larger ones only after some years. Detailed studies of the alkali - aggregate reaction have been reported by Diamond. He views the reaction as being primarily due to the high concentration of hydroxide ions in pore solutions but with the alkali cations being o
f critical importance because their concentration influences the reaction rates and the physical characteristics of the products of reaction. The necessity of the presence of Ca(OH)2 has been suggested. While we can predict that with given materials an alkali - aggregate reaction will take place, it is not generally possible to estimate the d
eleterious effects from the knowledge of the quantities of the reactive materials alone. For instance, the actual reactivity of aggregate is affected by its particle size and porosity as these influence the area over which the reaction can take place. Since the quantity of alkalis depends on the cement only, their concentration at the reactive
surface of aggregate will be governed by the magnitude of this surface. The minimum alkali content of cement at which expansive reaction may take place is 0.6 per cent of the soda equivalent. This is calculated from stoichiometry as the actual Na2O content plus 0.658 times the K2O content of the clinker. In exceptional cases, however, cements
with an even lower alkali content have been known to cause expansion. Within limits, the expansion of concrete made with a given reactive aggregate is greater the higher the alkali content of the cement and, for a given composition of cement, the greater its fineness. Other factors influencing the progress of the alkali - aggregate reaction
include the availability of non-evaporable water in the paste and the permeability of the paste. Moisture is necessary and the reaction is accelerated under conditions of alternating wetting and drying. Higher temperature accelerates the reaction, at least in the range 10 to 38 C (50 to 100 F). It can thus be seen that various physical and che
mical factors make the problem of alkali - aggregate reaction highly complex. In particular, the gel can change its constitution by absorption and thus exert a considerable pressure, while at other times diffusion of the gel out of the confined area takes place. It may be noted that, as the hydration of cement progresses, much of the alkali is
concentrated in the aqueous phase. As a consequence, pH rises and all silica minerals become soluble. It is not surprising, therefore, that, although we know that certain types of aggregate tend to be reactive, there is no simple way of determining whether a given aggregate will cause excessive expansion due to reaction with alkalis in the c
ement. Service record has generally to be relied upon but as little as 0.5 per cent of defective aggregate can cause damage. If no record is available it is possible only to determine the potential reactivity of the aggregate but not to prove that reaction will take place. A quick chemical test is prescribed by ASTM Standard C 289-71 (reapprov
ed 1976): the reduction in the alkalinity of a normal solution of NaOH when placed in contact with pulverized aggregate at 80 C (176 F) is determined, and the amount of dissolved silica is measured. The interpretation of the result is in many cases not clear, but generally a potentially deleterious reaction is indicated if the plotted test res
ult falls to the right of the boundary line of Fig. 3.10, reproduced from the ASTM Standard but based on Mielenz and Witte's paper. However, potentially deleterious aggregates represented by points lying above the dashed line in Fig. 3.10 may be extremely reactive with alkalis so that a relatively low expansion may result. These aggregates sho
uld therefore be tested further to determine whether their reactivity is deleterious by the mortar bar test described below. The test is of little value with lightweight aggregates. Fig. 3.10. Results of chemical test of ASTM Standard C 289-71 (reapproved 1976) In the mortar bar test for the physical reactivity of aggregate, the suspected
aggregate, crushed if need be and made up to a prescribed grading, is used in making special sand-cement mortar bars, using a cement with an equivalent alkali content of not less than 0.6 per cent. The bars are stored over water at 38 C (100 F), at which temperature the expansion is more rapid and usually higher than at higher or lower temper
atures. The reaction is also accelerated by the use of a fairly high water / cement ratio. The details of procedure are prescribed by ASTM Standard C 227-71 (reapproved 1976); a modification has been suggested by Brotschi and Mehta. The aggregate under test is considered harmful if it expands more than 0.05 per cent after 3 months or more than
0.1 per cent after 6 months. This test has shown a very good correlation with field experience, but a considerable time is required before judgement on the aggregate can be pronounced. On the other hand, as mentioned earlier, the results of the chemical test, which is rapid, are often not conclusive. Likewise, petrographic examination, alth
ough a useful tool in identifying the mineral constituents, cannot establish that a given mineral will result in abnormal expansion. A rapid and conclusive test for aggregate reactivity is thus still to be developed, and to use more than one of the existing tests is the best that can be done at the moment. It has been found that expansion due
to the alkali - aggregate reaction can be reduced or eliminated by the addition to the mix of reactive silica in a finely powdered form. This apparent paradox can be explained by reference to Fig. 3.11, showing the relation between the expansion of a mortar bar and the content of reactive silica of size between 850 and 300 um (No. 20 and No.
50 ASTM) sieves, i.e. not in a powdered form. In the range of low silica contents, the greater quantity of silica for a given amount of alkalis increases expansion, but with higher values of silica content the situation is reversed: the greater the surface area of the reactive aggregate the lower the quantity of alkalis available per unit of t
his area, and the less alkali-silica gel can be formed. On the other hand, owing to the extremely low mobility of calcium hydroxide, only that adjacent to the surface of the aggregate is available for reaction, so that the quantity of calcium hydroxide per unit area of aggregate is independent of the magnitude of the total surface area of the
aggregate. Thus, increasing the surface area increases the calcium hydroxide / alkali ratio of the solution at the boundary of the aggregate. Under such circumstances an innocuous (non-expanding) calcium alkali silicate product is formed. Fig. 3.11. Relation between expansion after 224 days and reactive silica content in the aggregate By
a similar argument, finely divided siliceous material added to the coarse reactive particles already present would reduce expansion, although the reaction with alkalis still takes place. These pozzolanic additions, such as crushed pyrex glass or fly ash, have indeed been found effective in reducing the penetration of the coarser aggregate parti
cles. There are indications that fly ash is not quite as good as other pozzolanas. The performance of any pozzolana in this respect should be tested following the ASTM Standard C 441-69 (reapproved 1975). With a sufficient amount of added silica, the initial reaction lowers the alkali concentration to that obtained with a low alkali cement whe
n no additive is present. It is essential, however, that a sufficient amount of pulverized silica be added; it is generally recommended that 20 g of reactive silica be added for each gram of alkali in excess of 0.5 per cent of the weight of the cement. Thus the amount of pozzolana is quite large. Inadequate amounts can actually aggravate the s
ituation and increase expansion if a particularly bad silica - alkali ratio is reached (cf. Fig. 3.11). A side effect of the addition of pozzolanas which has to be borne in mind is the increase in the water requirement of the mix. The alkali - aggregate reaction of the type described is widespread in many countries, notably North America, Sc
andinavia, India, Australia and New Zealand. The reaction was first encountered in Great Britain in 1978 in several structures ten to thirty years old. Alkali - carbonate Reaction Another type of deleterious aggregate reaction is that between some dolomitic limestone aggregates and alkalis in the cement. Expansion of concrete, similar to t
hat occurring as a result of the alkali - silica reaction, takes place under humid conditions. Typically, reaction zones up to 2 mm (or 0.1 in.) are formed around the active aggregate particles. Cracking develops within these rims and leads to a network of cracks and a loss of bond between the aggregate and the cement paste. Tests have shown
that de-dolomitization occurs, but the reactions involved are still imperfectly understood; in particular, the role of clay in the aggregate is not clear but expansive reaction seems to be nearly always associated with the presence of clay. Also, in expansive aggregates the dolomite and calcite crystals are very fine. One suggestion is that t
he expansion is due to moisture uptake by the previously unwetted clay, the de-dolomitization being necessary only to provide access of moisture to the locked-in clay; another is that clay increases the reactivity of the aggregate so that dolomite and calcium silicate hydrate produce Mg(OH)2, silica gel, and calcium carbonate with a volume inc
rease of about 4 per cent. A good review of current thinking is given by Walker. It should be stressed that only some dolomitic limestones cause expansive reaction in concrete. No simple test to identify them has been developed; in case of doubt, help can be obtained from an investigation of the rock texture, rock expansion in sodium hydroxid
e (ASTM Standard C 586-69 (reapproved 1975)) or when used in test beams made with cements having a high alkali content. ASTM is preparing a new standard for a test for length change of concrete due to alkali - carbonate rock reaction. One distinction between the silica - and carbonate - alkali reactions which should be borne in mind is that
in the latter the alkali is regenerated. It is probably for this reason that pozzolanas are not effective in controlling the alkali - carbonate expansion. Fortunately, reactive carbonate rocks are not very widespread and can usually be avoided. Thermal Properties of Aggregate There are three thermal properties of aggregate that may be si
gnificant in the performance of concrete: coefficient of thermal expansion, specific heat, and conductivity. The last two are of importance in mass concrete or where insulation is required, but not in ordinary structural work, and are discussed in the section dealing with the thermal properties of concrete (see p. 487). The coefficient of th
ermal expansion of aggregate influences the value of this coefficient for concrete containing the given aggregate: the higher the coefficient of the aggregate the higher the coefficient of the concrete, but the latter depends also on the aggregate content in the mix and on the mix proportions in general. There is, however, another aspect of t
he problem. It has been suggested that if the coefficients of thermal expansion of the coarse aggregate and of the cement paste differ too much, a large change in temperature may introduce differential movement and a break in the bond between the aggregate particles and the surrounding paste. However, possibly because the differential movemen
t is affected also by other forces, such as those due to shrinkage, a large difference between the coefficients is not necessarily detrimental when the temperature does not vary outside the range of, say, 4 to 60 C (40 to 140 F). Nevertheless, when the two coefficients differ by more than 5.5 x 10'-6 per C (3 x 10'-6 per F) the durability of
concrete subjected to freezing and thawing may be affected. The coefficient of thermal expansion can be determined by means of a dilatometer devised by Verbeck and Hass for use with both fine and coarse aggregate. The linear coefficient of thermal expansion varies with the type of parent rock, the range for the more common rocks being about
0.9 x 10'-6 to 16 x 10'-6 per C (0.5 x 10'-6 to 8.9 x 10'-6 per F), but the majority of aggregates lie between approximately 5 x 10'-6 to 13 x 10'-6 per C (3 x 10'-6 and 7 x 10'-6 per F) (see Table 3.13). For hydrated Portland cement paste, the coefficient varies between 11x10'-6 and 16 x 10'-6 per C (6 x 10'-6 and 9 x 10'-6 per F), but v
alues up to 20.7 x 10'-6 per C (11.5 x 10'-6 per F) have also been reported, the coefficient varying with the degree of saturation. Thus, a serious difference in coefficients occurs only with aggregates of a very low expansion; these are certain granites, limestones and marbles. Table 3.13: Linear Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Differ
ent Rock Types If extreme temperatures are expected, the detailed properties of any given aggregate have to be known. For instance, quartz undergoes inversion at 574 C and expands suddenly by 0.85 per cent. This would disrupt the concrete, and for this reason fire-resistant concrete is never made with quartz aggregate. Sieve Analysis
This somewhat grandiose name is given to the simple operation of dividing a sample of aggregate into fractions, each consisting of particles of the same size. In practice, each fraction contains particles between specific limits, these being the openings of standard test sieves. The test sieves used for concrete aggregate have square openin
gs and their properties are prescribed by BS 410 : 1976. Sieves used to be described by the size of the opening (in inches) for larger sizes, and by the number of openings per lineal inch for sieves smaller than about 1/8 in. Thus a No. 100 test sieve has 100 x 100 openings in each square inch, the size of the opening and the width of the wire
of which the mesh is made being laid down in previous editions of BS 410; a summary is given in an appendix to the 1976 edition. Nowadays, sieve sizes are designated by the nominal aperature size in millimetres or micrometres. Sieves smaller than 4 mm (0.16 in.) are normally made of wire cloth although, if required, this can be used up to 1
6 mm (0.62 in.). The wire cloth is made of phosphor bronze but for some coarser sieves brass and mild steel can also be used. The screening area, i.e. the area of the openings as a percentage of the gross area of the sieve, varies between 34 and 53 per cent. Coarse test sieves (4 mm (0.16 in.) and larger) are made of perforated mild steel pla
te, with a screening area of 44 to 65 per cent. All sieves are mounted in frames which can nest. It is thus possible to place the sieves one above the other in order of size with the largest sieve at the top, and the material retained on each sieve after shaking represents the fraction of aggregate coarser than the sieve in question but fine
r than the sieve above. 200 mm (8 in.) diameter frames are used for 5 mm (3/16 in.) or smaller sizes, and 300 or 400 mm (12 or 18 in.) diameter frames for 5 mm (3/16 in.) and larger sizes. It may be remembered that 5 mm (or 3/16 in., No. 4 ASTM) is the dividing line between the fine and coarse aggregate. The sieves used for concrete aggregate
consist of a series in which the clear opening of any sieve is approximately one-half of the opening of the next larger sieve size. The BS test sieve sizes in Imperial units for this series were as follows: 3 in., 1 1/2 in., 3/4 in., 3/8 in., 3/16 in., Nos. 7, 14, 25, 52, 100, and 200. For determination of oversize and undersize aggregate, a
nd especially for research work on aggregate grading, additional sieve sizes are required. The full sequence of test sieves is based theoretically on the ratio of 4/2 for the openings of two consecutive sieves. However, recently both the British (BS 410:1976) and American (ASTM Ell-70 (reapproved 1977)) sieves have been standardized generally
in accordance with the R40/3 sieve series of the International Standards Organization. Not all of these sizes form a true geometric series but follow "preferred numbers". Table 3.14 gives the standard sieve sizes according to their fundamental description by aperture in millimetres or micrometres and also the previous British and ASTM design
ations and approximate apertures in inches. Table 3.14: Standard American and British Sieve Sizes The international sieve sizes for aggregate are given by the standard ISO / DIS 6274: 1980; there is a lack of unanimity evident here as three series are recommended (Table 3.15) of which one, series C, does not overlap with the sieve sizes o
f Table 3.14. Table 3.15: International Sieve Sizes of ISO Standard 6274 In the United Kingdom, the sieve sizes used, according to British Standard 812: Part 1: 1975, are as follows: 75.0, 63.0, 50.0, 37.5, 28.0, 20.0, 14.0, 10.0, 6.30, 5.00, 3.35, 2.36, 1.70, 1.18 mm and 850, 600, 425, 300, 212, 150 and 75 um. Of these, four sizes (50.0,
28.0, 14.0 and 6.30 mm) do not fit into any of the sieve sizes of Table 3.14 or Table 3.15; they are part of a yet different ISO series of sieve sizes. For grading purposes, the sieve sizes normally used are: 75.0, 50.0, 37.5, 20.0, 10.0, 5.00, 2.36, 1.18 mm, and 600, 300, and 150 um. We can thus see that in discussing aggregate grading we h
ave to contend with two sets of sieve sizes. In this book, results of measurements made with Imperial size sieves will be reported by the exact metric equivalent, but grading curves for design purposes (see Chapter 10) will, wherever available, be based on the new BS metric sieve sizes. Before the sieve analysis is performed, the aggregate sa
mple has to be air-dried in order to avoid lumps of fine particles being classified as large particles and also to prevent clogging of the finer sieves. The weights of the reduced samples for sieving, as recommended by BS 812: Part 1: 1975, are given in Table 3.16 and Table 3.17 shows the maximum weight of material with which each sieve can co
pe. If this weight is exceeded on a sieve, material which is really finer than this sieve may be included in the portion retained. The material on the sieve in question should, therefore, be split into two parts and each should be sieved separately. Table 3.16: Minimum Weight of Sample for Sieve Analysis According to BS 812: Part 1: 1975
Table 3.17: Maximum Weight to be Retained at the Completion of Sieving According to BA 812: Part 1: 1975 The actual sieving operation can be performed by hand, each sieve in turn being shaken until not more than a trace continues to pass. The movement should be backwards and forwards, sideways left and right, circular clockwise and anticloc
kwise, all these motions following one another so that every particle "has a chance" of passing through the sieve. In most modern laboratories a sieve shaker is available, usually fitted with a time switch so that uniformity of the sieving operation can be ensured. None the less, care is necessary in order to make sure that no sieve is overloa
ded. (See Table 3.17.) The results of a sieve analysis are best reported in tabular form, as shown in Table 3.18. Column (2) shows the weight retained on each sieve. This is expressed as a percentage of the total weight of the sample and is shown in column (3). Now, working from the finest size upwards the cumulative percentage (to the neares
t one per cent) passing each sieve can be calculated [column (4)1, and it is this percentage that is used in the plotting of grading curves. Table 3.18: Example of Sieve Analysis Grading Curves The results of a sieve analysis can be grasped much more easily if represented graphically, and for this reason grading charts are very extensi
vely used. By using a chart it is possible to see at a glance whether the grading of a given sample conforms to that specified, or is too coarse or too fine, or deficient in a particular size. In the grading chart commonly used, the ordinates represent the cumulative percentage passing and the abscissae the sieve opening plotted to a logarith
mic scale. Since the openings of sieves in a standard series are in the ratio of 1/2, a logarithmic plot shows these openings at a constant spacing. This is illustrated in Fig. 3.12 which represents the data of Table 3.18. Fig. 3.12. Example of a grading curve (see table 3.18) It is convenient to choose a scale such that the scale spacin
g between two adjacent sieve sizes is approximately equal to 20 per cent on the ordinate scale; a visual comparison of different grading curves can then be made from memory. Fineness Modulus A single factor computed from the sieve analysis is sometimes used, particularly in the United States. This is the fineness modulus, defined as the s
um of the cumulative percentages retained on the sieves of the standard series: 150, 300, 600 um, 1.18, 2.36, 5.00 mm (ASTM Nos. 100, 50, 30, 16, 8, 4) and up to the largest sieve size present. It should be remembered that, when all the particles in a sample are coarser than, say, 600 um (No. 30 ASTM), the cumulative percentage retained on 300
um (No. 50 ASTM) should be entered as 100; the same value, of course, would be entered for 150 um (No. 100). The value of the fineness modulus is higher the coarser the aggregate (see column (5), Table 3.18). The fineness modulus can be looked upon as a weighted average size of a sieve on which the material is retained, the sieves being cou
nted from the finest. For instance, a fineness modulus of 4.00 can be interpreted to mean that the fourth sieve, 1.18 mm (No. 16 ASTM) is the average size. However, it is clear that one parameter, the average, cannot be representative of a distribution: thus the same fineness modulus can represent an infinite number of totally different size d
istributions or grading curves. The fineness modulus cannot, therefore, be used as a description of the grading of an aggregate, but it is valuable for measuring slight variations in the aggregate from the same source, i.e. as a day-to-day check. Nevertheless, within certain limitations, the fineness modulus gives an indication of the probable
behaviour of a concrete mix made with aggregate having a certain grading, and the use of the fineness modulus in assessment of aggregates and in mix design has many supporters. Grading Requirements We have seen how to find the grading of a sample of aggregate but it still remains to determine whether or not a particular grading is suit
able. A related problem is that of combining fine and coarse aggregates so as to produce a desired grading. What, then, are the properties of a "good" grading curve? Since the strength of fully compacted concrete with a given water / cement ratio is independent of the grading of the aggregate, grading is, in the first instance, of importance
only in so far as it affects workability. As, however, the development of strength corresponding to a given water / cement ratio requires full compaction, and this can be achieved only with a sufficiently workable mix, it is necessary to produce a mix that can be compacted to a maximum density with a reasonable amount of work. It should be s
tated at the outset that there is no one ideal grading curve but a compromise is aimed at. Apart from the physical requirements, the economic problem must not be forgotten: concrete has to be made of materials which can be produced cheaply so that no narrow limits can be imposed on aggregate. It has been suggested that the main factors govern
ing the desired aggregate grading are: the surface area of the aggregate, which determines the amount of water necessary to wet all the solids; the relative volume occupied by the aggregate; the workability of the mix; and the tendency to segregation. Segregation is discussed on p. 223, but it should be observed here that the requirements of
workability and absence of segregation tend to be partially opposed to one another: the easier it is for the particles of different sizes to pack, smaller particles passing into the voids between the larger ones, the easier it is also for the small particles to be shaken out of the voids, i.e. to segregate in the dry state. In actual fact, it
is the mortar (i.e. a mixture of sand, cement and water) that should be prevented from passing freely out of the voids in the coarse aggregate. It is also essential for the voids in the combined aggregate to be sufficiently small to prevent the cement paste from passing through and separating out. The problem of segregation is thus rather s
imilar to that of filters, although the requirements in the two cases are of course diametrically opposite: for the concrete to be satisfactory it is essential that segregation be avoided. There is a further requirement for a mix to be satisfactorily workable: it must contain a sufficient amount of material smaller than a 300 um (No. 50 ASTM)
sieve. Since the cement particles are included in this material, a richer mix requires a lower content of fine sand than a lean mix. If the grading of sand is such that it is deficient in finer particles, increasing the fine / coarse aggregate ratio may not prove a satisfactory remedy, as it may lead to an excess of middle sizes and possibl
y to harshness. (A mix is said to be harsh when one size fraction is present in excess, as shown by a steep step in the middle of a grading curve, so that particle interference results.) This need for an adequate amount of fines (provided they are structurally sound) explains why minimum contents of particles passing 300 um (No. 50 ASTM) and s
ometimes also 150 um (No. 100) sieves are laid down, as for instance in Tables 3.23 and 3.24 (pp. 186 and 187). However, it is now thought that the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation requirements of Table 3.24 for the minimum percentage of particles passing the 300 and 150 um (Nos. 50 and 100 ASTM) sieves are too high. It may be further noted that b
lended cements (see page 84) would automatically provide an adequate amount of fines. The presence of fines of all provenance (i.e. aggregate, filler, and cement) can be assured by using the following total content of particles smaller than 125 um. The volume of entrained air can be taken as equivalent to one-half the volume of fines and shou
ld be included in the above figures. German and Dutch mix specifications are essentially based on this approach. The requirement that the aggregate occupies as large a relative volume as possible is in the first instance an economic one, the aggregate being cheaper than the cement paste, but there are also technical reasons why too rich a mi
x is undesirable. It has also been assumed that the greater the amount of solid particles that can be packed into a given volume of concrete the higher its strength. This maximum density theory has led to the advocacy of grading curves parabolic in shape, or in part parabolic and then straight (when plotted to a natural scale), as shown in Fig
. 3.13. It was found, however, that the aggregate graded to give maximum density makes a harsh and somewhat unworkable mix. The workability is improved when there is an excess of paste above that required to fill the voids in the sand, and also an excess of mortar (sand plus cement) above that required to fill the voids in the coarse aggregate
. Fig. 3.13. Fuller's grading curve Let us now consider the surface area of the aggregate particles. The water / cement ratio of the mix is generally fixed from strength considerations. At the same time, the amount of cement paste has to be sufficient to cover the surface of all the particles so that the lower the surface area of the agg
regate the less paste, and therefore the less water, is required. Taking for simplicity a sphere of diameter D as representative of the shape of the aggregate we have the ratio of the surface area to volume of 6/D. This ratio of the surface of the particles to their volume (or, when the particles have a constant specific gravity, to their wei
ght) is called specific surface. For particles of a different shape, a coefficient other than 6/D would be obtained but the surface area is still inversely proportional to the particle size, as shown in Fig. 3.14 reproduced from Shacklock and Walker's report. It should be noted that a logarithmic scale is used for both the ordinates and the abs
cissae since the sieve sizes are in geometrical progression. Fig. 3.14. Relation between specific surface and particle size In the case of graded aggregate, the grading and the overall specific surface are related to one another, although of course there are many grading curves corresponding to the same specific surface. If the grading e
xtends to a larger maximum aggregate size, the overall specific surface is reduced and the water requirement decreases, but the relation is not linear. For instance increasing the maximum aggregate size from 10 mm to 63 mm (3/8 in. to 2 1/2 in.) can, under certain conditions, reduce the water requirement for a constant workability by as much a
s 50 kg per cubic metre (85 lb / yd3) of concrete. The corresponding decrease in the water / cement ratio may be as much as 0.15. Some typical values are shown in Fig. 3.15. Fig. 3.15. Influence of maximum size of aggregate on mixing water requirement for a constant slump The practical limitations of the maximum size of aggregate that ca
n be used under given circumstances and the problem of influence of the maximum size on strength in general are discussed on Page 195. It can be seen that, having chosen the maximum size of aggregate and its grading, we can express the total surface area of the particles using the specific surface as a parameter, and it is the total surface
of the aggregate that determines the water requirement or the workability of the mix. Mix design on the basis of the specific surface of the aggregate was first suggested by Edwards as far back as 1918, and interest in this method was renewed forty years later. Specific surface can be determined using the water permeability method, but no si
mple field test is available, and a mathematical approach is made difficult by the variability in the shape of different aggregate particles. This, however, is not the only reason why the design of mixes on the basis of the specific surface of aggregate is not universally recommended The application of surface area calculations was found to
break down for aggregate particles smaller than about 150 um (No. 100 ASTM) sieve, and for cement. These particles, and also some larger sand particles, appear to act as a lubricant in the mix and do not seem to require wetting in quite the same way as coarse particles. An indication of this can be obtained from some results of tests by Glanvi
lle, Collins and Matthews, reproduced in part in Table 3.19. Table 3.19: Water / Cement Ratio Required to Produce a Given Workability for Various Amounts of Crusher Dust (Smaller than 150 um (No. 100) Sieve) in the Aggregate Because specific surface gives a somewhat misleading picture of the workability to be expected (largely owing to an
overestimate of the effect of fine particles), an empirical surface index was suggested by Murdock and its values as well as those of the specific surface are given in Table 3.20. Table 3.20: Relative Values of Surface Area and Surface Index The overall effect of the surface area of an aggregate of given grading is obtained by multiplyi
ng the percentage weight of any size fraction by the coefficient corresponding to that fraction, and summing all the products. According to Murdock the surface index (modified by an angularity index) should be used, and in fact the values of this index are based on empirical results. On the other hand, Davey found that for the same total speci
fic surface of the aggregate the water requirement and the compressive strength of the concrete are the same for very wide limits of aggregate grading. This applies both to continuously and gap-graded aggregate, and in fact three of the four gradings listed in Table 3.21, reproduced from Davey's paper, are of the gap type. Table 3.21: Proper
ties of Concretes Made with Aggregates of the Same Specific Surface An increase in the specific surface of the aggregate for a constant water / cement ratio has been found to lead to a lower strength of concrete, as shown for instance in Table 3.22, reproducing Newman and Teychenne's results. The reasons for this are not quite clear, but it
is possible that a reduction in density of the concrete consequent upon an increase in fineness of the aggregate is instrumental in lowering the strength. Table 3.22: Specific Surface of Aggregate and Strength of Concrete for a 1:6 Mix with a Water / Cement Ratio of 0.60 It seems then that the surface area of the aggregate is an importan
t factor in determining the workability of the mix, but the exact role played by the finer particles has by no means been ascertained. The type gradings of Road Note No. 4 represent different values of overall specific surface. For instance, when river sand and gravel are used, the four grading curves, Nos. 1 to 4, of Fig. 3.16 correspond to
the specific surface of 1.6, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.3 m2 / kg, respectively. In practice, when trying to approximate type gradings, the properties of the mix will remain largely unaltered when compensation of a small deficiency of fines by a somewhat larger excess of coarser particles is applied but the departure must not be too great. The deficiency
and excess are, of course, mutually interchangeable in the above statement. Fig. 3.16. Road Note No. 4 type grading curves for 19.05 mm (3/4 in.) aggregate There is no doubt then that the grading of aggregate is a major factor in the workability of a concrete mix. Workability, in turn, affects the water and cement requirements, controls
segregation, has some effect on bleeding, and influences the placing and finishing of the concrete. These factors represent the important characteristics of fresh concrete and affect also its properties in the hardened state: strength, shrinkage, and durability. Grading is thus of vital importance in the proportioning of concrete mixes, but i
ts exact role in mathematical terms is not fully known, and the behaviour of this type of semi-liquid mixture of granular materials is still imperfectly understood. Finally, it must be remembered that far more important than devising a "good" grading is ensuring that the grading is kept constant; otherwise, variable workability results and, a
s this is usually corrected at the mixer by a variation in the water content, concrete of variable strength is obtained. Practical Gradings From the brief review in the previous section it can be seen how important it is to use aggregate with a grading such that a reasonable workability and a minimum segregation are obtained. The impor
tance of the latter requirement cannot be over-emphasized: a workable mixture which could produce a strong and economical concrete will result in a honeycombed, weak, not durable and variable end product if segregation takes place. The process of calculation of the proportions of aggregates of different size to achieve the desired grading com
es within the scope of mix design, and is described in Chapter 10 Here, the properties of some "good" grading curves will be discussed. It should be remembered, however, that in practice the aggregate available locally or within an economic distance has to be used, and this can generally produce satisfactory concrete, given an intelligent ap
proach and sufficient care. The curves most commonly referred to as a basis of comparison are those of the Road Research Note No. 4 on the Design of Concrete Mixes. They have been prepared for aggregates of 19.05 and 38.1 mm (3/4 in. and 1 1/2 in.) maximum size, and are reproduced in Figs. 3.16 and 3.17 respectively. Similar curves for aggregat
e with a 9.52 mm (3/8 in.) maximum size have been prepared by McIntosh and Erntroy, and are shown in Fig. 3.18. Fig. 3.17. Road Note No. 4 type grading curves for 38.1 mm (1 1/2 in.) aggregate Fig. 3.18. McIntosh and Erntroy's type grading curves for 9.52 mm (3/8 in.) aggregate Four curves are shown for each maximum size of aggregate,
but due to the presence of over- and under-size aggregate and also because of variation within any fraction size, practical gradings are more likely to lie in the vicinity of these curves than to follow them exactly. It is therefore convenient to talk about grading zones, and these are marked on all the diagrams. In some specifications defi
nite limits of grading, rather than a single curve, are laid down. Curve No. 1 represents the coarsest grading in each of the Figs. 3.16 to 3.18. Such a grading is comparatively workable and can, therefore, be used for mixes with a low water / cement ratio or for rich mixes; it is, however, necessary to make sure that segregation does not
take place. At the other extreme, curve No. 4 represents a fine grading: it will be cohesive but not very workable. In particular, an excess of material between 1.20 and 4.76 mm (No. 16 and 3/16 in.) test sieves will produce a harsh concrete, which, although it may be suitable for compaction by vibration, is difficult to place by hand. If the
same workability is to be obtained using aggregates with grading curves Nos. 1 and 4, the latter would require a considerably higher water content: this would mean a lower strength if both concretes are to have the same aggregate / cement ratio or, if the same strength is required, the concrete made with the fine aggregate would have to be con
siderably richer, i.e. each cubic metre would contain more cement than when the coarser grading is used. The change between the extreme gradings is progressive. In the case of gradings lying partly in one zone, partly in another, there is, however, a danger of segregation when too many intermediate sizes are missing (cf. gap grading). If, on
the other hand, there is an excess of middle-sized aggregate the mix will be harsh and difficult to compact by hand and possibly even by vibration. For this reason, it is preferable to use aggregate with gradings similar to type rather than totally dissimilar ones. Figs. 3.19 and 3.20 show the range of gradings used with 152.4 mm (6 in.) and
76.2 mm (3 in.) maximum aggregate size respectively, as given by McIntosh. The actual gradings, as usual, run parallel with the limits rather than crossing over from one to the other. Fig. 3.19. Range of gradings used with 152.4 mm (6 in.) aggregate Fig. 3.20. Range of gradings used with 76.2 mm (3 in.) aggregate In practice, the use
of separate fine and coarse aggregate means that a grading can be made up to conform exactly with a type grading at one intermediate point, generally the 5 mm (3/16 in.) size. Good agreement can usually also be obtained at the ends of the curve (150 um (No. 100) sieve and the maximum size used). If coarse aggregate is delivered in single-size
fractions, as is usually the case, agreement at additional points above 5 mm (3/16 in.) can be obtained, but for sizes below 5 mm (3/16 in.) blending of two or more sands is necessary. Grading of Fine and Coarse Aggregates Since for any but unimportant work fine and coarse aggregates are batched separately, the grading of each type of a
ggregate should be known and controlled. Formerly, two classes of fine aggregate were recognized, but it has been shown that by adjusting the ratio of the fine to coarse aggregate a good concrete could be obtained with either class of aggregate. For this reason, in the 1954 revision of BS 882 the classification of fine aggregate was altered t
o four grading zones. The grading requirements for these are reproduced in Table 3.23 and Fig. 3.21, and any fine aggregate whose grading falls wholly within the limits of any one zone is considered suitable. A tolerance of a total amount of 5 per cent on certain sieves is permitted, but the aggregate must not be finer than the exact limits of
the finest grading (No. 4) or coarser than the coarsest grading (No. 1). The only exception is in the case of crushed stone where 20 per cent is allowed to pass the 150 um (No. 100) test sieve in all zones. Fig. 3.21. Grading limits for sand in zones 1 to 4 of BS 882: 1973 Table 3.23: BS and ASTM Grading Requirements for Fine Aggregate
In BS 882 : 1973, the division into zones is based primarily on the percentage passing the 600 um (No. 30 ASTM) sieve, as shown by the values in Table 3.23. The main reason for this is that a large number of sands divide themselves naturally at just that size, the gradings above and below being approximately uniform. Furthermore, the content
of particles finer than the 600 um (No. 30 ASTM) sieve has a considerable influence on the workability of the mix, and provides a fairly reliable index of the overall specific surface of the sand. For comparison, the requirements of ASTM Standard C 33-78 are in part included in Table 3.23 (see Fig. 3.22). The limits of the latter specificati
on are much narrower than the overall limits of BS 882 : 1973. The requirements of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation are given in Table 3.24. It may be noted that in the case of air-entrained concrete lower quantities of the finest particles are acceptable, the entrained air acting effectively as very fine aggregate. ASTM Standard C 33-78 also al
lows reduced percentages passing sieves 300 um and 150 um (No. 50 and No. 100 ASTM) when the cement content is above 297 kg / m3 (500 lb / yd3) or if air entrainment is used with at least 237 kg of cement per cubic metre of concrete (400 1b / yd3). Fig. 3.22. ASTM Standard C 33-78 grading limits for fine aggregate Table 3.24: U.S. Bureau
of Reclamation Grading Requirements for Fine Aggregate Sand falling into any zone can generally be used in concrete, although under some circumstances the suitability of a given sand may depend on the grading and shape of the coarse aggregate. The suitability of the fine sand of zone 4 for use in reinforced concrete has to be tested. Sinc
e the greater part of this sand is smaller than the 600 um (No. 30 ASTM) sieve, a gap-graded or a nearly gap-graded aggregate is obtained, and special care in choosing the mix proportions must be exercised. The sand content of the mix should generally be low, and suggested values of coarse / fine aggregate ratio are given in Table 3.25. Tabl
e 3.25: Suggested Proportions by Weight of Coarse to Fine Aggregate for Sand of Different Zones Nevertheless, quite good concrete can be obtained with sand of zone 4, particularly using vibration. Work at the Building Research Establishment has shown that increasing the content of particles smaller than 150 um (No. 100) in crushed rock fine
aggregate from 10 to 25 per cent results in only a small decrease in the compressive strength of concrete, typically by 10 per cent. At the other extreme, the coarse sand of zone 1 produces a harsh mix, and a high sand content may be necessary for higher workability. This sand is more suitable for rich mixes or for use in concrete of low wo
rkability. Zone 2 represents a medium sand generally suitable for the "standard" 1:2 fine to coarse mix (when the maximum size of aggregate is 20 mm (3/4 in.)). In general terms, the ratio of coarse to fine aggregate should be higher the finer the grading of the fine aggregate: typical values are given in Table 3.25. When crushed rock coars
e aggregate is used, a slightly higher proportion of sand is required than with gravel aggregate in order to compensate for the lowering of workability by the sharp, angular shape of the crushed particles. The choice of correct proportions is particularly important as the grading of the sand approaches the fine outer limit of zone 4 or the co
arse outer limit of zone 1. It is worth noting, however, that, proportioned correctly, fine sand can be utilized with success, and this is of considerable economic importance in the United Kingdom where there is a predominance of fine sand; in the past there has been a great deal of prejudice against this type of material. An example of us
ing sand from any of the four zones to produce equally good concrete is given in Table 3.26, based on results obtained at the Building Research Station. The actual sand gradings are shown in Fig. 3.21. An aggregate / cement ratio of 6.04 and a water / cement ratio of 0.60, both by weight, were used throughout. To keep the workability approxima
tely constant the coarse / fine aggregate ratio was varied so that the overall specific surface of aggregate remained at 2.55 m2 / kg. Table 3.26 shows that concrete of similar quality was obtained in all cases. Table 3.26: Properties of Concretes Made with Aggregates of Constant Overall Specific Surface By way of contrast, Table 3.27 sho
ws test results for the case when the same materials were used but the coarse / fine aggregate ratio was kept constant. The use of finer sand led to a higher water requirement and consequently a lower strength of concrete. Table 3.26: Properties of Concretes Made with Aggregates of Fixed Proportions The requirements of BS 882 : 1973 for t
he grading of coarse aggregate are reproduced in Table 3.28: values are given both for graded aggregate and for nominal one-size fractions. For comparison, some of the limits of ASTM Standard C 33-78 are given in Table 3.29. Table 3.28: Grading Requirements for Coarse Aggregate According to BS 882 : 1973 Table 3.29: Grading Requirements fo
r Coarse Aggregate According to ASTM Standard C 33-78 The actual grading requirements depend to some extent on the shape and surface characteristics of the particles. For instance, sharp, angular particles with rough surfaces should have a slightly finer grading in order to reduce the possibility of interlocking and to compensate for the hi
gh friction between the particles. The actual grading of crushed aggregate is affected primarily by the type of crushing plant employed. A roll granulator usually produces fewer fines than other types of crushers, but the grading depends also on the amount of material fed into the crusher. The grading limits for all-in aggregate prescribed by
BS 882 : 1973 are reproduced in Table 3.30. It should be remembered that this type of aggregate is not used except for small and unimportant jobs, mainly because it is difficult to avoid segregation in stockpiling. Table 3.30: Grading Requirements for All-in Aggregate According to BS 882 : 1973 Oversize and Undersize Strict adherence
to size limits of aggregate is not possible: breakage during handling will produce some undersize material, and wear of screens in the quarry or at the crusher will result in oversize particles being present. In the United States it is usual to specify over- and undersize screen sizes as 7/6 and 5/6, respectively, of the nominal sieve size; a
ctual values are given in Table 3.31. The quantity of aggregate smaller than the undersize or larger than the oversize is generally severely limited. Table 3.31: Sizes of Over- and Undersize Screens of U.S. Bureau of Reclamation The grading requirements of BS 882 : 1973 allow some under- and oversize both for coarse and fine aggregate. T
he figures for the former are given in Table 3.28, and it can be seen that between 5 and 15 per cent oversize is permitted. However, no aggregate must be retained on a sieve one size larger (in the standard series) than the nominal maximum size. 5 to 10 per cent undersize material is allowed. In the case of single-size aggregate, some undersiz
e is also allowed, and the amount passing the sieve next smaller than the nominal size is also prescribed. It is important that this fine fraction of coarse aggregate be not neglected in the calculation of the actual grading. For fine aggregate, a total departure of 5 per cent from zone limits is allowed but not beyond the coarser limit of zo
ne 1 or the finer limit of zone 4 (see Table 3.23). Gap-Graded Aggregate As mentioned earlier, aggregate particles of a given size pack so as to form voids that can be penetrated only if the next smaller size of particles is sufficiently small. This means that there must be a minimum difference between the sizes of any two adjacent parti
cle fractions. In other words, sizes differing but little cannot be used side by side, and this has led to advocacy of gap-graded aggregate. Gap grading can then be defined as a grading in which one or more intermediate size fractions are omitted. The term continuously graded is used to describe conventional grading when it is necessary to d
istinguish it from gap grading. On a grading curve, gap grading is represented by a horizontal line over the range of sizes omitted. For instance, the top grading curve of Fig. 3.23 shows that no particles of size between 10.0 and 2.36 mm (3/8 in. and No. 8 ASTM) sieve are present. In some cases, a gap between 10.0 and 1.18 mm (3/8 in. and No.
16 ASTM) sieve is considered suitable. Omission of these sizes would reduce the number of stockpiles of aggregate required and lead to economy. In the case of aggregate of 20.0 mm (3/4 in.) maximum size, there would be two piles only: 20.0 to 10.0 mm and sand screened through a 1.18 mm (No. 16 ASTM) screen. The particles smaller than 1.18 mm
(No. 16 ASTM) sieve size could easily enter the voids in the coarse aggregate so that the workability of the mix would be higher than that of a continuously graded mix of the same sand content. Fig. 3.23. Typical gap gradings Tests by Shacklock have shown that, for a given aggregate / cement ratio and water / cement ratio, a higher worka
bility is obtained with a lower sand content in the case of gap-graded aggregate than when continuously graded aggregate is used. However, in the more workable range of mixes, gap-graded aggregate showed a greater proneness to segregation. For this reason, gap grading is recommended mainly for mixes of relatively low workability that are to be
compacted by vibration. Good control and, above all, care in handling so as to avoid segregation, are essential. It may be observed that even when some "ordinary" aggregates are used gap grading exists; for instance, sand belonging to zone 4 of BS 882: 1973 is almost completely deficient in particles between the 5.00 and 2.36 or 1.18 mm (3/1
6 in. and No. 8 or No. 16 ASTM) sieve sizes. Thus, whenever we use a zone 4 sand without blending with a coarser sand, we are in fact using a gap-graded aggregate. Gap-graded aggregate can be used in any concrete, but there are two cases of interest: preplaced aggregate concrete (see p. 254) and exposed aggregate concrete; in the latter, a p
leasing finish is obtained since a large quantity of only one size of coarse aggregate becomes exposed after treatment. From time to time, various claims of superior properties have been made for concrete made with gap-graded aggregate, but these do not seem to have been substantiated. Strength, both compressive and tensile, does not appear t
o be affected. Likewise, Fig. 3.24, showing McIntosh's results, confirms that, using given materials with a fixed aggregate / cement ratio (but adjusting the sand content), approximately the same workability and strength are obtained with gap and continuous gradings; Brodda and Weber reported a slight negative influence of gap grading on stren
gth. Fig. 3.24. Workability and strength of 1:6 concretes made with gap- and continuously graded aggregates Similarly, there is no difference in shrinkage of the concretes made with aggregate of either type of grading, although it might be expected that a framework of coarse particles almost touching one another would result in a lower t
otal change in dimensions on drying. The resistance of concrete to freezing and thawing is lower when gap-graded aggregate is used. It seems, therefore, that the rather extravagant claims made by advocates of gap grading are not borne out. The explanation lies probably in the fact that, while gap grading makes it possible for maximum packing
of particles to occur, there is no means of ensuring that it will occur. Both gap-graded and continuously graded aggregate can be used to make good concrete, but in each case the right percentage of sand has to be chosen. Thus, once again, it can be seen that we should not aim at any ideal grading but find the best combination of the availabl
e aggregates. Maximum Aggregate Size It has been mentioned before that the larger the aggregate particle the smaller the surface area to be wetted per unit weight. Thus, extending the grading of aggregate to a larger maximum size lowers the water requirement of the mix, so that, for a specified workability and richness, the water / ceme
nt ratio can be lowered with a consequent increase in strength. This behaviour has been verified by tests with aggregates up to 38.1 mm (1 1/2 in.) maximum size, and is usually assumed to extend to larger sizes as well. Experimental results show, however, that above the 38.l mm (1 1/2 in.) maximum size the gain in strength due to the reduced
water requirement is offset by the detrimental effects of lower bond area (so that volume changes in the paste cause larger stresses at interface) and of discontinuities introduced by the very large particles, particularly in rich mixes. Concrete becomes grossly heterogeneous and the resultant lowering of strength may possibly be similar to t
hat caused by a rise in the crystal size and coarseness of texture of rocks. This adverse effect of increase in the size of the largest aggregate particles in the mix exists, in fact, throughout the range of sizes, but below 38.1 mm (1 1/2 in.) the effect of size on the decrease in the water requirement is dominant. For larger sizes, the bala
nce of the two effects depends on richness of the mix as shown in Fig. 3.25. Thus the best maximum size of aggregate from the standpoint of strength is a function of the richness of the mix. Specifically, in lean concrete (165 kg of cement per cubic metre (280 lb / yd3)), the use of 150 mm (or 6 in.) aggregate is advantageous. However, in str
uctural concrete of usual proportions, from the point of view of strength there is no advantage in using aggregate with a maximum size greater than about 25 or 40 mm (1 or 1 1/2 in.). Moreover, the use of larger aggregate would require the handling of a separate stockpile and might increase the risk of segregation. However, a practical decisio
n would also be influenced by the availability and cost of different size fractions. There are, of course, structural limitations too: the maximum size of aggregate should be no more than one fifth to one quarter of the thickness of the concrete section and is related also to the spacing of reinforcement. The governing values are prescribed in
codes of practice. Fig. 3.25. Influence of maximum size of aggregate on the 28-day compressive strength of concretes of different richness Use of "Plums" The original idea of the use of aggregate as an inert filler can be extended to the inclusion of large stones in a normal concrete: thus the apparent yield for a given amount of cem
ent is increased. These stones are called "plums" and used in a large concrete mass they can be as big as a 300 mm (1 ft) cube but should not be greater than one-third of the least dimension to be concreted. The volume of plums should not exceed 20 to 30 per cent of the total volume of the finished concrete, and they have to be well disperse
d throughout the mass. This is achieved by placing a layer of normal concrete, then spreading the plums, followed by another layer of concrete, and so on. Each layer should be of such thickness as to ensure at least 100 mm (4 in.) of concrete around each plum. Care must be taken to ensure that no air is trapped underneath the stones and that t
he concrete does not work away from their underside. The plums must have no adhering coating. The placing of plums requires a large amount of labour and also breaks the continuity of concreting. It is, therefore, not surprising that with the current high ratio of the cost of labour to the cost of cement the use of plums is not economical exce
pt under special circumstances, but their use is covered by standards in some countries, e.g. South Africa. Handling of Aggregate Handling and stockpiling of coarse aggregate can easily lead to segregation. This is particularly so when discharging and tipping permits the aggregate to roll down a slope. A natural case of such segregation
is a scree (talus): the size of particles is uniformly graded from largest at the bottom to smallest at the top. A description of the precautions necessary in handling operations is outside the scope of this book, but one vital recommendation should be mentioned: coarse aggregate should be split into size fractions 5 to 10, 10 to 20, 20 to 4
0 mm (or 3/16 to 3/8, 3/8 to 3/4, 3/4 to 1 1/2 in.), etc. These fractions should be handled and stockpiled separately and remixed only when being fed into the concrete mixer in the desired proportions. Thus segregation can occur only within the narrow size range of each fraction, and even this can be reduced by careful handling procedures. C
are is necessary to avoid breakage of the aggregate: particles greater than 40 mm (or 1 1/2 in.) should be lowered into bins by means of rock ladders and not dropped from a height. On big and important jobs the results of segregation and breakage in handling (i.e. excess of undersize particles) are eliminated by "finish rescreening" immediate
ly prior to feeding into the batching bins over the mixer. The proportions of different sizes are thus controlled much more effectively but the complexity and cost of the operations are correspondingly increased. This is, however, repaid by easier placing of uniformly workable concrete and by a possible saving in cement due to the uniformity o
f the concrete. 14 Properties of Hardened Concrete The properties of fresh concrete are important only in the first few hours of its history whereas the properties of hardened concrete assume an importance which is retained for the remainder of the life of the concrete. The important properties of hardened concrete are strength, deformat
ion under load, durability, permeability and shrinkage. In general, strength is considered to be the most important property and the quality of concrete is often judged by its strength. There are, however, many occasions when other properties are more important, for example, low permeability and low shrinkage are required for water-retaining s
tructures. Although in most cases an improvement in strength results in an improvement of the other properties of concrete there are exceptions. For example, increasing the cement content of a mix improves strength but results in higher shrinkage which in extreme cases can adversely affect durability and permeability. One of the primary object
ives of this chapter is to help the reader to understand the factors which affect each of the important properties of hardened concrete. Since the properties of concrete change with age and environment it is not possible to attribute absolute values to any of them. Laboratory tests give only an indication of the properties which concrete may
have in the actual structure as the quality of the concrete in the structure depends on the workmanship on site. For these reasons it is important to be able to judge the quality of concrete in situ. The direct method of testing drilled cores is expensive and limited because the removal of too many cores weakens a structure. Nondestructive tes
ts have therefore been developed for the assessment of concrete quality. The limitations and applications of nondestructive testing together with a brief description of the techniques is given at the end of this chapter. 14.1 Strength The strength of concrete is defined as the maximum load (stress) it can carry. As the strength of concr
ete increases its other properties usually improve and since the tests for strength, particularly in compression, are relatively simple to perform concrete compressive strength is commonly used in the construction industry for the purpose of specification and quality control. Concrete is a comparatively brittle material which is relatively wea
k in tension. Compressive Strength The compressive strength of concrete is taken as the maximum compressive load it can carry per unit area. Concrete strengths of up to 80 N mm-2 can be achieved by selective use of the type of cement, mix proportions, method of compaction and curing conditions. Concrete structures, except for road pavemen
ts, are normally designed on the basis that concrete is capable of resisting only compression, the tension being carried by steel reinforcement. In the United Kingdom a 150 mm cube is commonly used for determining the compressive strength. The standard method described in BS 1881: Part 116 requires that the test specimen should be cured in wat
er at 20 +/- 2 C and crushed, by loading it at a constant rate of stress increase of between 12 and 24 N mm-2 min-1, immediately after it has been removed from the curing tank. Tensile Strength The tensile strength of concrete is of importance in the design of concrete roads and runways. For example, its flexural strength or modulus of ru
pture (tensile strength in bending) is utilised for distributing the concentrated loads over a wider area of road pavement. Concrete members are also required to withstand tensile stresses resulting from any restraint to contraction due to drying or temperature variation. Unlike metals, it is difficult to measure concrete strength in direct t
ension and indirect methods have been developed for assessing this property. Of these the split cylinder test is the simplest and most widely used. This test is fully described in BS 1881: Part 117 and entails diametrically loading a cylinder in compression along its entire length. This form of loading induces tensile stresses over the loaded
diametrical plane and the cylinder splits along the loaded diameter. The magnitude of the induced tensile stress fct at failure is given by (formula) where F is the maximum applied load and l and d are the cylinder length and diameter respectively. The flexural strength of concrete is another indirect tensile value which is also common
ly used (BS 1881: Part 118). In this test a simply supported plain concrete beam is loaded at its third points, the resulting bending moments inducing compressive and tensile stresses in the top and bottom of the beam respectively. The beam fails in tension and the flexural strength (modulus of rupture) fcr is defined by (formula) where F
is the maximum applied load, L the distance between the supports, and b and d are the beam breadth and depth respectively at the section at which failure occurs. The tensile strength of concrete is usually taken to be about one-tenth of its compressive strength. This may vary, however, depending on the method used for measuring tensile stren
gth and the type of concrete. In general the direct tensile strength and the split cylinder tensile strength vary from 5 to 13 per cent and the flexural strength from 11 to 23 per cent of the concrete cube compressive strength. In each case, as the strength increases the percentage decreases. As a guide, the modulus of rupture may be taken as
0.7 / (cube strength) N mm-2 and the direct tensile strength as 0.45 / (cube strength) N mm- 2 although, where possible, values based on tests using the actual concrete in question should be obtained. 14.2 Factors influencing Strength Several factors which affect the strength of concrete are shown in figure 14.1. In this section their i
nfluence is discussed with particular reference to compressive strength. In general, tensile strength is affected in a similar manner. Figure 14.1 Factors affecting strength of concrete Influence of the Constituent Materials Cement The influence of cement on concrete strength, for given mix proportions, is determined by its fineness
and chemical composition through the processes of hydration (see chapter 12). The gain in concrete strength as the fineness of its cement particles increases is shown in figure 14.2. The gain in strength is most marked at early ages and after 28 days the relative gain in strength is much reduced. At some later age the strength of concrete made
with fine cements may not be very different from that made with normal cement (300 m2 kg- 1). The role of the chemical composition of cement in the development of concrete strength can best be appreciated by studying table 14.1 and figures 14.3 and 14.4. It is apparent that cements containing a relatively high percentage of tricalcium silicat
e (C3S) gain strength much more rapidly than those rich in dicalcium silicate (C2S), as shown in figure 14.3; however, at later ages the difference in the corresponding strength values is small. In fact there is a tendency for concretes made with low-heat cements eventually to develop slightly higher strengths (figure 14.4). This is possibly d
ue to the formation of a better quality gel structure in the course of hydration. Figure 14.2 Effect of cement fineness on the development of concrete strength, based on Bennett and Collings (1969) TABLE 14.1 Chemical composition of various Portland cements with similar fineness Figure 14.3 Development of strength of typical concrete mad
e with different Portland cements (see table 14.1) Figure 14.4 Development of strength of typical concrete made with different Portland cements (see table 14.1) Water A concrete mix containing the minimum amount of water required for complete hydration of its cement, if it could be fully compacted, would develop the maximum attainable
strength at any given age. A water - cement ratio of approximately 0.25 (by weight) is required for full hydration of the cement but with this water content a normal concrete mix would be extremely dry and virtually impossible to compact. A partially compacted mix will contain a large percentage of voids and the concrete strength will drop.
On the other hand, while facilitating placing and compaction, water in excess of that required for full hydration produces a somewhat porous structure resulting from loss of excess water, even for a fully compacted concrete. In practice a concrete mix is designed with a view to obtaining maximum compaction under the given conditions. In such a
concrete, as the ratio of water to cement increases the strength decreases in a manner similar to that illustrated in figure 15.3 (see chapter 15). Aggregate When concrete is stressed, failure may originate within the aggregate, the matrix or at the aggregate - matrix interface; or any combination of these may occur. In general the aggreg
ates are stronger than the concrete itself and in such cases the aggregate strength has little effect on the strength of concrete. The bond (aggregate - matrix interface) is an important factor determining concrete strength. Bond strength is influenced by the shape of the aggregate, its surface texture and cleanliness. A smooth rounded aggre
gate will result in a weaker bond between the aggregate and matrix than an angular or irregular aggregate or an aggregate with a rough surface texture. The associated loss in strength however may be offset by the smaller water - cement ratio required for the same workability. Aggregate shape and surface texture affect the tensile strength more
than the compressive strength. A fine coating of impurities, such as silt and clay, on the aggregate surface hinders the development of a good bond. A weathered and decomposed layer on the aggregate can also result in a poor bond as this layer can readily become detached from the sound aggregate beneath. The aggregate size also affects the st
rength. For given mix proportions, the concrete strength decreases as the maximum size of aggregate is increased. On the other hand, for a given cement content and workability this effect is opposed by a reduction in the water requirement for the larger aggregate. However, it is probable that beyond a certain size of aggregate there is no obvi
ous advantage in further increasing the aggregate size except perhaps in some instances when larger aggregate may be more readily available. The optimum maximum aggregate size varies with the richness of the mix, being smaller for the richer mixes, and generally lies between 10 and 50 mm. Concrete of a given strength can be produced with aggreg
ates having a variety of different gradings provided due care is exercised to ensure that segregation does not occur. The suitability of a grading to some extent depends on the shape and texture of the aggregate. Aggregates which react with the alkali content of a cement adversely affect concrete strength. This is rarely a problem in the United
Kingdom, even though some cases have been reported since 1976 (BRE Digest 258). Admixtures As a general rule, admixtures can only affect concrete strength by changing the hydration processes and the air content of the mix and / or by enabling changes to be made to the mix proportions, most importantly to the water - cement ratio. Acceler
ating admixtures increase the rate of hydration thereby providing an increased early strength with little or no change at later ages unless the increased rate of heat evolution causes internal cracking in which case a lower strength will result. In contrast, with retarding admixtures the early strength of concrete is reduced owing to the delay
in setting time. Provided no air is entrained, the concrete strength will be approximately the same as that of the control mix within a few days. Air entrainment in concrete will cause a reduction in strength at all ages and to achieve a required strength the mix cement content has to be increased. However, in practice the increased yield and
improvement in workability is also taken into account in the mix design when using air-entraining admixtures and there is generally no significant change in concrete strength for the usual range of air content. Most water-reducing admixtures, including superplasticizers, do not have any significant effect on the hydration of the cement. Thus, w
hen these admixtures are used to improve workability no significant change in strength should be expected, providing of course that the air content remains unchanged. On the other hand if the water content of the mix is reduced while maintaining workability an increase in strength corresponding to the new water - cement ratio will result. It
should be noted that the effect of particular admixtures in concrete depends on the precise nature of the admixtures themselves, the constituent materials and proportions of the mix and the ambient conditions (particularly temperature). In consequence, although for practical purposes the above mentioned guidelines apply, to obtain an accurate
estimate of their effect on concrete strength in individual circumstances it is necessary to carry out trial mixes. Influence of the Methods of Preparation When concrete materials are not adequately mixed into a consistent and homogeneous mass, some poor quality concrete is inevitably the result. Even when a concrete is adequately mixed ca
re must be taken during placing and compaction to minimise the probability of the occurrence of bleeding, segregation and honeycombing all of which can result in patches of poor quality concrete. A properly designed concrete mix is one that does not demand the impossible from site operatives before it can be fully compacted in its final locati
on. If full compaction is not achieved the resulting voids produce a marked reduction in concrete strength. Influence of Curing Curing of concrete is a prerequisite for the hydration of the cement content. For a given concrete, the amount and rate of hydration and furthermore the physical make-up of the hydration products are dependent on
the time - moisture - temperature history. Generally speaking, the longer the period during which concrete is kept in water, the greater its final strength. It is normally accepted that a concrete made with ordinary Portland cement and kept in normal curing conditions will develop about 75 per cent of its final strength in the first 28 days.
This value varies with the nominal strength of concrete however, increasing as concrete strength increases. The gain in strength with age up to the time of loading can now be used only for estimating the static modulus of elasticity of concrete in structures (BS 8110: Part 2). The age factors for strength prescribed for this purpose are given
in table 14.2. TABLE 14.2 Age factors for strength of concrete The development of concrete strength under various curing conditions is shown in figure 14.5. It is apparent that concrete left in air achieves the lowest strength values at all ages owing to the evaporation of the free mixing water from the concrete. The gain in strength dep
ends on a number of factors such as relative humidity, wind velocity and the size of structural member of test specimen. Figure 14.5 shows that both the increased hydration due to improvements in initial curing (moist or water curing at normal temperature) and the condition of the concrete at the time of testing have a significant effect on the
final apparent strength of concrete. It should also be noted that moist (or water) curing after an initial period in air results in a resumption of the hydration process and that concrete strength is further improved with time, although the optimum strength may not be realised. Figure 14.5 Effect of curing and condition of concrete when tes
ted on concrete strength, based on Gilkey (1937) The temperature at which concrete is cured has an important bearing on the development of its strength with time. The rate of gain in strength of concrete made with ordinary Portland cement increases with increase in concrete temperature at early ages (figure 14.6), although at later ages th
e concrete made and cured at lower temperatures shows a somewhat higher strength. Figure 14.7 shows how a high temperature during the placing and setting of concrete can adversely affect the development of its strength from early ages. On the other hand, when the initial temperature is lower than the subsequent curing temperature, then higher t
emperatures during final curing result in significantly higher strengths (figure 14.8). A possible explanation for this behaviour is that a rapid initial hydration appears to form a gel structure (hydration product) of an inferior quality and this adversely affects concrete strength at later ages. Concretes made with other Portland cements woul
d respond to temperature in a somewhat similar manner. Figure 14.6 Comparative compressive strength of concrete cast, sealed and maintained at different temperatures, based on Price (1951) Figure 14.7 Comparative compressive strength of sealed concrete specimens maintained at different temperatures for 2 hours after casting and subsequent
ly cured at 21 C, based on Price (1951) Figure 14.8 Comparative compressive strength of concrete cast, sealed and maintained at 10 C for the first 24 hours and subsequently cured at different temperatures, based on Price (1951) It has been suggested that the strength of concrete can be related to the product of age and curing temperature,
commonly known as maturity. However, such relationships are dependent on a number of factors such as curing temperature history, particularly the temperature at early ages (see figures 14.7 and 14.8), and are therefore limited in their general applicability for predicting concrete strength. Influence of Test Conditions The conditions und
er which tests to determine concrete strength are carried out can have a considerable influence on the strength obtained and it is important that these effects are understood if test results are to be correctly interpreted. Specimen shape and size Three basic shapes used for the determination of compressive strength are the cube, cylinder
and square prism. Each shape gives different strength results and furthermore for a given shape the strength also varies with size. Figure 14.9 shows the influence of specimen diameter and it can be seen that as the size decreases, the apparent strength increases. The measured strength of concrete is also affected by the height - diameter rati
o (figure 14.10). For height - diameter ratios less than 2 strength begins to increase rapidly owing to the restraint provided by the machine platens. Strength remains sensibly constant for height - diameter ratios between 2 and 3 and thereafter shows a slight reduction. The relative influence of slenderness may be modified by several inherent
characteristics of concrete such as strength, air-entrainment, strength of aggregate, degree of moist curing and moisture content at the time of testing. Figure 14.9 Effect of specimen size on the apparent 28-day concrete compressive strength for specimens with a height - diameter ratio of 2 and aggregate whose maximum diameter is one-quart
er of the diameter of the specimen, based on Price (1951) Figure 14.10 Effect on height - diameter ratio on concrete compressive strength for specimens moist-cured at room temperature and test wet BS 1881: Part 116 specifies the use of concrete cubes for determining compressive strength; 150 mm cubes are widely used in the United Kingdom f
or quality-control purposes. However, cored cylindrical specimens are used for measuring the compressive strength of concrete in situ and precast members (BS 1881: Part 120). This standard gives a set of equations for converting the measured strength of a core into an equivalent in situ cube strength. It should be noted that the estimation of e
quivalent standard cube strengths from core strengths is no longer considered to be valid, because of large variations in the relationship between the two strengths arising from variations in site conditions including percentage of reinforcement, dimensions of members and the methods of compaction and curing. The effect on the measured strengt
h of the variations in the height - diameter ratio of drilled cores is taken into account by using the correction factors given in table 14.3. The effect of the shape of the test specimen is taken into account by multiplying the cylinder (core) strength, for a cylinder (core) having a height - diameter ratio of 2, by 1.25 to obtain the equivale
nt cube strength. Since the relationship between height - diameter ratio and strength depends on the type of concrete, the use of one set of correction factors of the type given in table 14.3 can only be suitable for a limited range of concrete materials. It should be noted that the correction factors given in table 14.3 are most likely to fav
our low-strength concretes. The estimation of the equivalent in situ cube strength from compression tests performed on cored cylindrical specimen can be further influenced by a multitude of other factors and the reader is advised to consult the Concrete Society Technical Report on concrete core testing for strength (1976), the British Standard
Guide on Assessment of Concrete Strength in Existing Structures (BS 6089), Murphy (1984) and Munday and Dhir (1984). TABLE 14.3 Correction factor for compression tests on cylinders (cores) Specimen moisture content and temperature This should not be confused with the effect of moisture and temperature during curing. The strength of conc
rete can be influenced by the absence or presence of moisture and by temperature only when these conditions generate internal stresses which change the magnitude of the external load required to bring about failure. Since the mode of failure in different strength tests is different, it follows that the influence of moisture content and temperat
ure on the apparent strength varies. In the case of compression tests, air-dry concrete has a significantly higher strength than concrete tested in a saturated condition (figure 14.5). The lower strengths of wet concrete can be attributed mainly to the development of internal pore pressure as the external load is applied. The flexural stren
gth of saturated concrete is greater however than that of concrete which is only partially dry owing to tensile stresses developed near the surface of the dry concrete by differential shrinkage. The initial drying is therefore critical with the apparent strength reaching a minimum value within the first few days; thereafter it begins to increas
e gradually as the concrete approaches a completely dry state. A thoroughly dry concrete specimen in which tensile stresses are not being induced has a higher apparent flexural strength than saturated concrete. The indirect tensile or split cylinder strength is lower for saturated concrete than for thoroughly dried concrete. Since the influe
nce of the moisture content on concrete strength varies with the type of test, standard strength tests (BS 1881: Part 116) should be performed on specimens in a saturated condition. Method of loading The compressive strength of concrete increases as the lateral confining pressure increases (figure 14.11). Figure 14.11 Effect of lateral
compression on concrete compressive strength The apparent strength of concrete is affected by the rate at which it is loaded. In general, for static loading, the faster the loading rate the higher the indicated strength. However, the relative effects of the rate of loading vary with the nominal strength, age and extent of moist curing. Hig
h-strength mature concretes cured in water are most sensitive to loading rate and particularly so for loading rates greater than 600 N mm-2 min-1. BS 1881: Part 116 requires concrete in compression tests to be loaded at 12 to 24 N mm-2 min-1 and within this small range of loading rates variations in the measured strength of concrete will be ins
ignificant. The standard rates of loading for flexural and split cylinder tests correspond to rates of increase of tensile stress of 1.2 to 6.0 N mm-2 min-1 and 1.2 to 2.4 N mm-2 min-1 respectively (BS 1881: Parts 117 and 118). For the flexural test the standard requires the use of the lower loading rates for low strength concretes and the hig
her loading rates for high strength concretes. When loads on a structure are predominantly cyclic (repeated loading and unloading) in character, the effects of fatigue should also be considered. This kind of loading produces a reduction in strength. A reduction in strength of as much as 30 per cent of the normal static strength value can take
place, although this depends on the stress - strength ratio, the frequency of loading and the type of concrete. Structural concrete is commonly subjected to sustained loads. It is probable that concrete can withstand higher loads if a constant load is maintained before loading to failure. Improvement in compressive strength can occur for sus
tained loads up to 85 per cent of the normal static strength although the actual gain in strength depends on the duration and magnitude of load, type of concrete and age. The increase in strength is probably due to consolidation of the concrete under sustained load and the redistribution of stresses within the concrete. 14.3 Deformation
Concrete deforms under load, the deformation increasing with the applied load and being commonly known as elastic deformation (figure 14.12). Concrete continues to deform with time, under constant load; this is known as time-dependent deformation or creep (figure 14.13). Deformation due to concrete shrinkage is discussed in section 14.5 and is
specifically excluded here. Another important consideration in design is the deformation resulting from changes in temperature. The coefficient of thermal expansion for concrete is about 12 x 10'-6 per C. Figure 14.12 A typical stress - strain curve showing different moduli of elasticity Figure 14.13 A typical illustration of deformation
of concrete subjected to constant load Elastic Deformation Unlike that for metals, the load - deformation relationship for concrete subjected to a continuously increasing load is nonlinear in character. The nonlinearity is most marked at higher loads. When the applied load is released the concrete does not fully recover its original shape
(see figure 14.12). Under repeated loading and unloading the deformation at a given load level increases, although at a decreasing rate, with each successive cycle. All these characteristics of concrete indicate that it should be considered as a quasi-elastic material and when computing the elastic constants, namely, the modulus of elasticity
and Poisson's ratio, the method employed should be clearly stated. It is only for simplicity and convenience that the elastic modulus is assumed to be constant in both concrete technology and the design of concrete structures. Modulus of elasticity This is defined as the ratio of load per unit area (stress) to the elastic deformation per
unit length (strain) modulus of elasticity E = stress / strain = (formula). The modulus is used when estimating the deformation, deflection or stresses under normal working loads. Since concrete is not a perfectly elastic material, the modulus of elasticity depends on the particular definition adopted (see figure 14.12). The initial tan
gent modulus is of little value for structural applications since it has significance only for low stresses during the first load cycle. The tangent modulus is difficult to determine and is applicable only within a narrow band of stress levels. The secant modulus is easily determined and takes into account the total deformation at any one point
. The method prescribed in BS 1881: Part 121 requires repeated loading and unloading before the specimen is loaded for determination of its secant modulus of elasticity from a stress - strain curve, which then approaches a straight line for stresses up to one-third of the concrete cylinder strength. The modulus of elasticity for most concretes
, at 28 days, ranges from 15 to 40 kN mm-2. As a guide, the modulus may be assumed to be 3.8 / (concrete strength, N mm-2) kN mm-2 for normal weight concrete. For structural design purposes, the short term elastic modulus values for normal weight concrete given in BS 8110: Part 2 may be used. Poisson's ratio When concrete is subjected to
axial compression, it contracts in the axial direction and expands laterally. Poisson's ratio is defined as the ratio of the lateral strain to the associated axial strain and varies from 0.1 to 0.3 for normal working stresses. A value of 0.2 is commonly used. Factors influencing the Elastic Behaviour of Concrete Concrete is a multiphase ma
terial and its resistance to deformation under load is dependent on the stiffness of its various phases such as aggregate, cement paste and voids, and the interaction between individual phases. In general the factors which influence the strength of concrete also affect deformation although the extent of their influence may well vary. The modulu
s of elasticity increases with strength, although the two properties are not directly related because different factors exert varying degrees of influence on strength and modulus of elasticity. Although relationships between the two properties may be derived they are only applicable within the range of variables considered. In short there is n
o unique relationship between strength and modulus of elasticity. The influence of stress level and rate of loading on both the axial and lateral strains is shown in figure 14.14 for a concrete which has been cured in water (20 C +/- 1 C) and air-dried before loading in uniaxial compression. It should be noted that the slower the rate of loadi
ng the greater the strains at a given stress level. This is due to the fact that during loading both elastic and creep strains occur, the creep strains increasing with the duration of time for which the load acts. The variation of tangent modulus and Poisson's ratio, for the same concrete, with stress level and rate of loading are shown in fig
ure 14.15. The general trends depicted in the figure apply to all concretes although the exact relationship may vary with the type of concrete and the methods employed for measuring the properties. Figure 14.14 Stress - strain relationships of concrete for different rates of loading, based on Dhir and Sangha (1972) Figure 14.15 Variation
of tangent modulus and Poisson's ratio with stress level and rate of loading, based on Dhir and Sangha (1972) Creep Deformation When concrete is subjected to a sustained load it first undergoes an instantaneous deformation (elastic) and thereafter continues to deform with time (figure 14.13). The increase in strain with time is termed cre
ep. It should be noted that after an initially high rate of creep the creep continues but at a continuously decreasing rate, except when the sustained load is large enough to cause failure, in which case the rate of creep increases before failure occurs. The removal of the sustained load results in an immediate reduction in strain and this is f
ollowed by a gradual decrease in strain over a period of time. The gradual decrease in strain is called creep recovery. Creep and creep recovery are related phenomena with somewhat similar characteristics. Creep is not wholly reversible and some permanent strain remains after creep recovery is complete. Since concrete in service is subjected
to sustained loads for long periods of time the effect of creep strains, which normally exceed the elastic strains, must be considered in structural design. Failure to include the effects of creep strains may lead to serious underestimates of beam deflections and over-all structural deformation and, in those cases where structural stability is
involved. the provision of members with inadequate strength. In prestressed concrete, allowance must be made for the loss of tension in the prestressing tendons resulting from the shortening of a member under the action of creep. Creep strain can also be beneficial in that it can relieve local stress concentrations which might otherwise lead t
o structural damage. A classic example of this is the reduction of shrinkage stresses in restrained members. Factors influencing creep Both the type of concrete (as described by its ingredients, curing history, strength and age) and the relative magnitude of the applied stress with respect to concrete strength (stress - strength ratio) aff
ect the creep strain. For a given concrete the creep strain is almost directly proportional to the stress - strength ratio for ratios up to about one-third. For the same stress - strength ratio, the creep strain increases as both cement content and water - cement ratio increase (figure 14.16) and decreases as the relative humidity and age at l
oading increase (figure 14.17). Figure 14.16 Effect of cement content and water - cement ratio on ultimate creep strain of concrete at 50 per cent relative humidity loaded at an age of 28 days, based on CEB-FIP (1970) Figure 14.17 Effect of relative humidity and age at loading on creep, based on Neville (1970) The influence of the const
ituent materials of concrete on creep is somewhat complex. The different types of cement influence creep because of the associated different rates of gain in concrete strength. For example, concrete made with rapid-hardening Portland cement shows less creep than concrete made with ordinary Portland cement and loaded at the same age. Normal roc
k aggregates have a restraining effect on concrete creep and the use of large, high modulus aggregates can be beneficial in this respect. The environmental conditions of concrete subjected to a sustained load can also have a marked effect on the magnitude of creep. For example, concrete cured under humid conditions and then loaded in a relati
vely dry atmosphere undergoes 3 greater creep strain than if the original conditions had been maintained. A concrete allowed to reach moisture equilibrium before loading, however, is not adversely affected. Creep decreases as the mass of concrete increases owing to the slower rate at which loss of water can take place within a large mass of con
crete. Several mathematical equations have been proposed for estimating creep strains. Both the rate of creep and its ultimate magnitude are dependent on a multitude of factors. These expressions can only be truly applicable to concretes similar to those for which they were designed. Nevertheless, creep strains are usually estimated for desig
n purposes. It has been noted that, for a given concrete, creep strain depends on the stress - strength ratio. For practical purposes, concrete creep strain may be assumed to be directly proportional to the elastic deformation up to a stress - strength ratio of about two-thirds. On this assumption the ultimate creep strain may be estimated for
a given water - cement ratio and cement content using figure 14.16. This creep value may be modified for different environmental moisture conditions and ages on loading using figure 14.17. It may be assumed that 50 per cent of the total estimated creep will take place within one month and 75 per cent within the first six months after loading.
14.4 Durability Besides its ability to sustain loads, concrete is also required to be durable. The durability of concrete can be defined as its resistance to deterioration resulting from external and internal causes (figure 14.18). The external causes include the effects of environmental and service conditions to which concrete is subje
cted, such as weathering, chemical actions and wear. The internal causes are the effects of salts, particularly chlorides and sulphates, in the constituent materials, interaction between the constituent materials, such as alkali - aggregate reaction, volume changes, absorption and permeability. Figure 14.18 Factors affecting durability of co
ncrete In order to produce a durable concrete care should be taken to select suitable constituent materials. It is also important that the mix contains adequate quantities of materials in proportions suitable for producing a homogeneous and fully compacted concrete mass. Weathering Deterioration of concrete by weathering is usually bro
ught about by the disruptive action of alternate freezing and thawing of free water within the concrete and expansion and contraction of the concrete, under restraint, resulting from variations in temperature and alternate wetting and drying. Damage to concrete from freezing and thawing arises from the expansion of porewater during freezing;
in a condition of restraint, if repeated a sufficient number of times, this results in the development of hydraulic pressure capable of disrupting concrete. Road kerbs and slabs, dams and reservoirs are very susceptible to frost action. The resistance of concrete to freezing and thawing can be improved by increasing its impermeability. This c
an be achieved by using a mix with the lowest possible water - cement ratio compatible with sufficient workability for placing and compacting into a homogeneous mass. Durability can be further improved by using air-entrainment, an air content of 3 to 6 per cent of the volume of concrete normally being adequate for most applications. The use of
air-entrained concrete is particularly useful for roads where salts are used for de-icing. BS 8110: Part 1 recommends the use of entrained air for a concrete of characteristic strength below 50 N mm-2 where it is likely to be exposed to freezing and thawing actions while wet and its surfaces are subject to the effects of de-icing salts. The le
vel of air content required varies with the maximum size of aggregate used, ranging from an average of 7 per cent for 10 mm to 4 per cent for 40 mm nominal maximum aggregate sizes. It is also important that, wherever possible, provision be made for adequate drainage of exposed concrete surfaces. A dry concrete is not affected by freezing. The t
ype of cement used has no effect although during the very early stages of hydration the use of a cement with a high rate of hydration can be beneficial. Damage to a structure resulting from the expansion and contraction of concrete should be minimised by providing joints which permit such movement without restraint. Chemical Attack In gen
eral, concrete has a low resistance to chemical attack. There are several chemical agents which react with concrete but the most common forms of attack are those associated with leaching, carbonation, chlorides and sulphates. Chemical agents essentially react with certain compounds of the hardened cement paste and the resistance of concrete to
chemical attack therefore can be affected by the type of cement used. The resistance to chemical attack improves with increased impermeability. Leaching Calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2, in hardened cement paste dissolves readily in water . Thus, if concrete in service absorbs or permits the passage of water through it the calcium hydroxide in t
he hardened cement is removed, or leached out. Leaching can seriously impair the durability of concrete. Hydraulic structures in which water may pass through cracks, areas of segregated or porous concrete or along poor construction joints suffer from this kind of attack. Concrete may also absorb rain or groundwater and the presence of carbon d
ioxide in such waters enhances the process of leaching. Free carbon dioxide and organic acids are found in acidic peaty groundwater. A homogeneous and dense concrete with low permeability significantly reduces the effectiveness of the leaching action. The use of pozzolanas (e g. pulverized-fuel ash) can also be helpful, as it reduces the perm
eability of concrete and fixes Ca(OH)2, thus lowering the soluble lime in concrete. Care should be taken in selecting and proportioning the constituent materials and in curing the concrete to ensure that shrinkage cracking is minimised. Carbonation Carbon dioxide (CO2), in the presence of moisture, reacts with Ca(OH)2 present in hydrated c
oncrete to form calcium carbonate (CaCO3). This process is known as the carbonation of concrete, which can take place even with the level of CO2 present in the normal atmosphere. Carbonation continues from the concrete surface, including the surfaces of any cracks, throughout the life of the concrete but the products of carbonation reduce the
rate of carbonation as the depth of the carbonated layer increases. The data available show that, for a given concrete, the depth of carbonation is roughly proportional to the square-root of time. The key factor in the advancement of the carbonation front is the permeability of concrete, which in turn depends on the mix proportions, particularl
y the water - cement ratio, and how well the concrete has been compacted and cured. The environmental conditions that are also important are the relative humidity and temperature. The rate of carbonation increases with temperature and this effect is more pronounced at relative humidities within the optimum range of 50 to 75 per cent. Thus, in
certain Middle East regions depths of carbonation much greater than those generally encountered in the UK have been reported (Smith and Evans, 1986). The effect of carbonation on concrete durability is significant only for concrete in which steel is embedded (see chapter 5). Concrete is a highly alkaline material (pH about 13). This is largel
y due to the presence of soluble Ca(OH)2, although sodium and potassium oxides also contribute a little. This alkalinity results in the formation of a passive oxide film on the surface of embedded steel in concrete which protects it against corrosion. The carbonation of concrete depletes Ca(OH)2 present and thereby lowers the alkalinity of carb
onated concrete to below 9, at which point the protective oxide film is destroyed. Thus, corrosion can occur when carbonation in concrete reaches embedded steel. The products of corrosion occupy a volume greater than that of the steel which has been affected and the associated bursting forces can result in significant cracking and subsequent s
palling of the concrete in these locations. The provision of adequate concrete cover, that is a depth of cover greater than the anticipated depth of carbonation, to all otherwise unprotected embedded steel, is essential if corrosion resulting from the effect of carbonation is to be avoided. Chloride attack Soluble chlorides in de-icing sal
ts or occurring naturally in soils, seawater and ground water can enter concrete by absorption through its surface, by capillary attraction along interconnected voids or by direct access through cracks in the concrete. For plain concrete the presence of chlorides, in this context, is not generally a cause for concern in the UK, although salt we
athering (see Sulphate attack) does cause problems in some other regions. For concrete in which steel is embedded the presence of chlorides is a potentially more serious condition, particularly in prestressed concrete. Chloride ions in concrete adjacent to the steel can readily destroy, even at high alkalinities, the passive oxide film which
normally protects the steel against corrosion (see Carbonation). The presence of chloride ions not only effectively initiates the electro-chemical process of corrosion, subject to the availability of moisture and oxygen, but it also increases the electrical conductivity of the concrete and thus results in an increased corrosion current leading
to an accelerated rate of corrosion. The disruptive effects of the products of corrosion have been discussed previously (see Carbonation). For a more detailed discussion of reinforcement corrosion the reader is referred to the Report by A.C.I. Committee 222 (1985). Adequate protection against external sources of soluble chlorides can generall
y be achieved by the use of properly designed mixes producing dense impermeable concrete with adequate concrete cover to the embedded steel, together with careful attention to all aspects of detail design particularly those associated with crack control. Where appropriate a protective coating or lining can also be provided. When significant
quantities of chlorides are introduced into concrete at the mixing stage, through the choice of constituent materials (such as water, aggregates or admixtures containing calcium chloride), little can generally be done afterwards to rectify the situation. The presence of internal chlorides not only promotes more rapid corrosion of the steel, but
also has a number of other undesirable effects (Fookes et al. ,1976) including the reduced resistance of concrete to sulphate attack. Limits on the total chloride content of concrete mixes are prescribed in BS 8110: Part 1 to ensure adequate durability in this context. Sulphate attack Most sulphate solutions react with the calcium hydrox
ide, Ca(OH)2, and calcium aluminate, C3A, of hydrated cement to form calcium sulphate and calcium sulphoaluminate compounds. Calcium and magnesium sulphates are most active and occur widely in soils (particularly clays), groundwater and seawater. Although these compounds, unlike calcium hydroxide, do not readily dissolve in water their volume
is greater than the volume of the compounds of cement paste from which they are formed. This increase in volume within the hardened concrete contributes towards the breakdown of its structure. The intensity and rate of sulphate attack depend on a number of factors such as type of sulphate (magnesium sulphate is the most vigorous), its concent
ration and the continuity of its supply to concrete. The concentration of sulphates in solution is expressed in parts of SO3 per million (p.p.m.), by weight. Permeability and the presence of cracks also affect the severity of the attack. The type of cement is a very important factor and the resistance of various cements to sulphate attack incr
eases in the following order: ordinary and rapid-hardening Portland cement, Portland blastfurnace cement and low-heat Portland cement, sulphate-resisting Portland cement and supersulphated cement and finally high-alumina cement. As previously stated, owing to their inherent ability to fix the Ca(OH)2 liberated by hydration of Portland cements,
pozzolanas such as pulverized-fuel ash can be employed to effect improvement in the resistance of concrete to sulphate attack. Chlorides reduce the resistance of concrete to sulphate attack. The use of ground granulated blastfurnace slag (ggbfs) also has a beneficial effect against sulphate attack. To protect concrete from sulphate attack eve
ry effort should be made to produce an impermeable concrete. Requirements given in BS 8110: Part 1 regarding the type of cement, water - cement ratio and minimum cement content for concrete exposed to various degrees of sulphate attack are reproduced in table 14.4. The number of construction joints should be minimised since these can be partic
ularly prone to attack. For concrete structures housed in sulphate-bearing soils, protective linings such as the various proprietary self-adhesive membranes, or protective coatings, such as bitumens, tars and epoxy resins, may also be applied on exterior surfaces although the long-term effectiveness of some coatings cannot always be assured.
TABLE 14.4 Requirements for concrete exposed to sulphate attack, based on BS 8110: Part 1 Another form of external attack, not usually found in the UK but widely reported in regions with climate and geological environments normally associated with desert terrain, is that known as salt weathering (Fookes et al., 1976). This is typified by a
physical disintegration of the concrete surface resulting from entry of soluble salts (sulphates and / or chlorides) into the pore spaces within the concrete matrix and the pores in the aggregates, and their subsequent crystallisation within these pores. Internal stresses induced in the concrete by the volume changes of the salt crystals, assoc
iated with moisture and temperature changes can lead to cracking and subsequent disintegration of the surface concrete. Progressive deterioration of the surface, which commonly occurs within a short distance of the ground surface, might normally be expected. This form of attack is unaffected by the type of cement and can only be completely eli
minated by the provision of an adequate protective lining or surface coating. External forms of protection together with the use, where appropriate, of sulphate resistant cements, will not be fully effective in the prevention of sulphate attack if significant quantities of sulphates have already been introduced into the concrete, via its cons
tituent materials, during mixing. Limits on the soluble sulphate content of concrete mixes are prescribed in BS 8110: Part 1 to minimise, in a practical manner, the possible effects of internal sulphates (Fookes et al., 1976). Wear The main causes of wear of concrete are the cavitation effects of fast-moving water, abrasive material in wa
ter, wind blasting and attrition and impact of traffic. Certain conditions of hydraulic flow result in the formation of cavities between the flowing water and the concrete surface. These cavities are usually filled with water vapour charged with extraordinarily high energy and repeated contact with the concrete surface results in the formation
of pits and holes, known as cavitation erosion. Since even a good-quality concrete will not be able to resist this kind of deterioration the best remedy is therefore the elimination of cavitation by producing smooth hydraulic flow. Where necessary, the critical areas may be lined with materials having greater resistance to cavitation erosion.
In general, the resistance of concrete to erosion and abrasion increases with increase in strength. The use of a hard and tough aggregate tends to improve concrete resistance to wear. Alkali - Aggregate Reactions Certain natural aggregates react chemically with the alkalis present in Portland cement. When this happens these aggregates ex
pand or swell resulting in cracking and disintegration of concrete. The most common form of alkali - aggregate reaction (AAR) is alkali - silica reaction (ASR) which is associated with siliceous rocks containing silica in its active (amorphous) form such as cherts, siliceous limestones and certain volcanic rocks. The new alkali silicate gel fo
rmed as a result can imbibe a considerable amount of water, thus producing a volume expansion and, where this expansion is sufficient, an eventual disruption of concrete. The minimum alkali content of cement required to produce enough alkali silicate gel (expansive reaction) to damage concrete is 0.6 per cent of the soda equivalent. Moisture i
s necessary for the alkali - silica reaction and increased temperatures accelerate this reaction. The simplest preventive measure for this type of deterioration is not to use alkali reactive aggregate with cements having a high alkali content. Adverse effects of the alkali - silica reaction can be minimised by using suitable proportions of eith
er pulverized-fuel ash (pfa) or ground granulated blastfurnace slag (ggbfs) in the concrete mix. For further guidance on minimising the risk of ASR in concrete, the reader is referred to BRE Digest 258 and the Concrete Society Report (1985). The second type of expansive alkali - aggregate reaction is known as alkali - carbonate reaction (ACR)
, which occurs with certain argillaceous dolomitic limestones containing some clay, although not all such reactive rocks necessarily produce deleterious expansions. The environmental factors affecting the alkali - carbonate reaction and the preventative measures are essentially the same as for the alkali - silica reaction, but there is some dou
bt about the effectiveness of pozzolanic materials in controlling the alkali - carbonate reaction. The reactive carbonate rocks are relatively more rare in occurrence than the reactive silica rocks. Volume Changes Principal factors responsible for volume changes are the chemical combination of water and cement and the subsequent drying of
concrete, variations in temperature and alternate wetting and drying. When a change in volume is resisted by internal or external forces this can produce cracking. The greater the imposed restraint, the more severe the cracking. The presence of cracks in concrete reduces its resistance to the action of leaching, corrosion of reinforcement, att
ack by sulphates and other chemicals, alkali - aggregate reaction and freezing and thawing, all of which may lead to disruption of concrete. Severe cracking can lead to complete disintegration of the concrete surface particularly when this is accompanied by alternate expansion and contraction. Volume changes can be minimised by using suitable
constituent materials and mix proportions having due regard to the size of structure. Adequate moist curing is also essential to minimise the effects of any volume changes. Permeability and Absorption Permeability refers to the ease with which water can pass through the concrete. This should not be confused with the absorption property o
f concrete and the two are not necessarily related. Absorption may be defined as the ability of concrete to draw water into its voids. Low permeability is an important requirement for hydraulic structures and in some cases watertightness of concrete may be considered to be more significant than strength although, other conditions being equal, c
oncrete of low permeability will also be strong and durable. A concrete which readily absorbs water is susceptible to deterioration. Concrete is inherently a porous material. This arises from the use of water in excess of that required for the purpose of hydration in order to make the mix sufficiently workable and the difficulty of completel
y removing all the air from the concrete during compaction. If the voids are interconnected concrete becomes pervious although with normal care concrete is sufficiently impermeable for most purposes. Concrete of low permeability can be obtained by suitable selection of its constituent materials and their proportions followed by careful placing,
compaction and curing. In general for a fully compacted concrete, the permeability decreases with decreasing water - cement ratio. Permeability is affected by both the fineness and the chemical composition of cement. Coarse cements tend to produce pastes with relatively high porosity. Aggregates of low porosity are preferable when concrete wi
th a low permeability is required. Segregation of the constituent materials during placing can adversely affect the impermeability of concrete. 14.5 Shrinkage Shrinkage of concrete is caused by the settlement of solids and the loss of free water from the plastic concrete (plastic shrinkage), by the chemical combination of cement with wat
er (autogenous shrinkage) and by the drying of concrete (drying shrinkage). Where movement of the concrete is restrained, shrinkage will produce tensile stresses within the concrete which may cause cracking. Most concrete structures experience a gradual drying out and the effects of drying shrinkage should be minimised by the provision of move
ment joints and careful attention to detail at the design stage. Plastic Shrinkage Shrinkage which takes place before concrete has set is known as plastic shrinkage. This occurs as a result of the loss of free water with, or without, significant settlements of solids in the mix. Since evaporation usually accounts for a large proportion of
the water losses plastic shrinkage is most common in slab construction and is characterised by the appearance of surface cracks which can extend quite deeply into the concrete. Crack patterns associated with significant settlement (plastic settlement cracks) generally coincide with the line of the reinforcement. Preventive measures are usually
based on methods of reducing water loss. This can be achieved in practice by making the mix more cohesive and by covering concrete with wet hessian or polythene sheets or by spraying it with a membrane curing compound. Autogenous Shrinkage In a set concrete, as hydration proceeds, a net decrease in volume occurs since the hydrated cement
gel has a smaller volume than the sum of the cement and water constituents. As hydration continues in an environment where the water content is constant, such as inside a large mass of concrete, this decrease in volume of the cement paste results in shrinkage of the concrete. This is known as autogenous shrinkage because, as the name implies,
it is self-produced by the hydration of cement. However, when concrete is cured under water, the water taken up by cement during hydration is replaced from outside and furthermore the gel particles absorb more water, thus producing a net increase in volume of the cement paste and an expansion of the concrete. On the other hand if concrete is k
ept in a dry atmosphere water is drawn out of the hydrated gel and additional shrinkage, known as drying shrinkage, occurs. Several factors influence the rate and magnitude of autogenous shrinkage. These include the chemical composition of cement, the initial water content, temperature and time. The autogenous shrinkage can be up to 100 x 10'
-6 of which 75 per cent occurs within the first three months. Drying Shrinkage When a hardened concrete, cured in water, is allowed to dry it first loses water from its voids and capillary pores and only starts to shrink during further drying when water is drawn out of its cement gel. This is known as drying shrinkage and in some concretes
it can be greater than 1500 x 10'-6, but a value in excess of 800 x 10'-6 is usually considered to be undesirable for most structural applications. After an initial high rate of drying shrinkage concrete continues to shrink for a long period of time but at a continuously decreasing rate (see figure 14.19). For practical purposes, it may be ass
umed that for small sections 50 per cent of the total shrinkage occurs in the first year. Figure 14.19 Drying shrinkage and expansion characteristics of concrete When concrete which has been allowed to dry out is subjected to a moist environment, it swells. However, the magnitude of this expansion is not sufficient to recover all the ini
tial shrinkage even after prolonged immersion in water. Concrete subjected to cyclic drying and wetting approaches the same shrinkage level as that caused by complete drying (figure 14.19). A test procedure for determining shrinkage is described in BS 1881: Part 5. Factors affecting Drying Shrinkage Several factors influence the over-all d
rying shrinkage of concrete. These include the type, content and proportion of the constituent materials of concrete, the size and shape of the concrete structure, the amount and distribution of reinforcement and the relative humidity of the environment. In general, drying shrinkage is directly proportional to the water - cement ratio and inv
ersely proportional to the aggregate - cement ratio (see figure 14.20). Because of the interaction of the effects of aggregate - cement and water - cement ratios, it is possible to have a rich mix with a low water - cement ratio giving higher shrinkage than a leaner mix with a higher water - cement ratio (Dhir et al., 1978). For a given water -
cement ratio shrinkage increases with increasing cement content. Figure 14.20 Effect of water - cement and aggregate - cement ratios on drying shrinkage of concrete at 20 C and 50 per cent relative humidity, based on Lea (1970) Since the aggregate exerts a restraining influence on shrinkage the maximum aggregate content compatible with
other required properties is desirable. When the aggregate itself is susceptible to large moisture movement, this can aggravate shrinkage (or swelling) of the concrete (BRE Digest 35, 1971, and Dhir et al., 1978) and may result in excessive cracking and large deflections of beams and slabs. The composition and fineness of cement can also affec
t its shrinkage characteristics. In general, shrinkage increases as the specific surface area of cement increases (table 14.5) although this effect is slight and is usually overshadowed by the effects of water - cement ratio and aggregate - cement ratio. Increases in dicalcium silicate (C2S) content and ignition loss usually result in increase
d shrinkage. Tricalcium aluminate (C3A) appears to influence the expansion of concrete under moist conditions. Nevertheless, the shrinkage characteristics of concrete cannot reliably be predicted from an analysis of the chemical composition of its cement. In general, admixtures which reduce the water requirement of concrete without affecting it
s other properties will reduce its shrinkage. Air-entrainment itself has no significant influence on shrinkage. Calcium chloride may considerably increase shrinkage. TABLE 14.5 Influence of the fineness of cement on drying shrinkage of concrete (aggregate - cement ratio 3) after 500 days, Bennett and Loat (1970) The size and shape of a s
pecimen affects the rate of moisture movement in concrete and this in turn influences the rate of volume change. Since drying begins from the surface, it follows that the greater the surface area per unit mass, the greater the rate of shrinkage. For a given shape, the initial rate of shrinkage is greater for small specimens although there will
be little difference in the ultimate drying shrinkage, if this stage is ever reached for very large masses of concrete. The shrinkage of reinforced concrete is less than that of plain concrete owing to the restraint developed by the reinforcement. This restraint induces tensile stresses in the concrete which may be large enough to cause crack
ing. The relative humidity and temperature of the environment have a significant effect on both the rate and magnitude of shrinkage in as much as they affect the movement of water in concrete. The duration of initial moist curing has little effect on ultimate shrinkage although it affects the initial rate of shrinkage. 14.6 Evaluation of
the Quality of Concrete From Nondestructive Testing The quality of concrete is usually taken to mean its strength and durability although other properties such as resistance to deformation and shrinkage can be significant in determining structural behaviour. In general most of the properties of concrete improve with increasing strength and f
or this reason the quality of concrete is often judged by its strength. Nondestructive testing, as the name implies, requires that the material under test is not damaged during testing. Direct measurement of the strength of concrete involves destructive stresses and thus cannot be used for determining the quality of concrete in structures. Fu
rthermore, the compressive strength test, as described in BS 1881: Part 116 can only indicate the potential strength of the mix. The actual concrete strength within a concrete unit or structure depends on the conditions of placing, compaction and curing. Although test samples can be cored from the structure and tested for evaluating the qualit
y of concrete, this operation is too expensive for general use. Moreover, only a limited number of cores can be taken without damaging the structure. It is for these reasons that attempts have been made, in the last four decades, to determine some suitable nondestructive test for determining the quality of concrete. Several tests have now been
developed (BS 1881: Part 201) but those which have been most widely accepted include vibrational methods for estimating strength, durability and uniformity and for detecting flaws, and hardness methods for estimating strength. Although the tests are simple to perform they have certain limitations. Nevertheless, when applied rationally the tec
hniques often provide information which cannot otherwise be obtained by direct methods. The vibrational methods can also be beneficially employed in laboratory investigations where progressive changes in the quality of concrete due to environmental effects are to be evaluated. Resonance Method This method is used to determine the dynamic
modulus of elasticity. A concrete specimen of a well-defined shape, such as a beam similar to the one used in the flexural test, is subjected to vibration in either the longitudinal, flexural or torsional mode. Basically the experimental technique is similar in each case and the only difference is the way in which the beam is supported and exci
ted. For the longitudinal mode of vibration, as described in BS 1881: Part 5, the beam is clamped at its centre and the exciter and pick-up units are brought into contact with the ends of the beam, without exerting restraint, so that the ends are free to vibrate in the longitudinal direction (see figure 14.21). The exciter unit is driven by a
variable-frequency oscillator and forces the specimen into longitudinal vibration. These vibrations are received by the pick-up unit and after amplification their amplitude is indicated on a meter. Figure 14.21 A typical arrangement for measuring the longitudinal resonance of a concrete beam During the test the frequency of the oscillator
is varied so that resonance is obtained at the fundamental frequency, indicated by maximum deflection on the meter. The dynamic modulus of elasticity Ed is given by (formula) where n is the natural frequency of the fundamental mode of longitudinal vibration of the specimen (Hz), l the length of the specimen (mm) and p its density (kg m-3)
. The value of the constant F depends on the shape of the specimen and the mode of vibration. In general, changes in the quality of concrete are related to changes in the dynamic modulus of elasticity but these relationships are not unique and are affected by several factors such as the constituent materials, particularly the type of aggregat
e, mix proportions and curing conditions. However, for a given concrete the variation in dynamic modulus of elasticity can give a good indication of variations in strength and static modulus of elasticity, and this test is particularly useful for assessing the progressive change in strength and durability as affected by various factors such as
the action of alternate freezing and thawing and sulphate solutions. The main disadvantage of the resonance method is that it cannot be useful for assessing the properties of concrete in an actual structure since it requires specimens of shapes for which relationships between frequency and the dynamic modulus of elasticity are known. Ultras
onic Pulse Method In this method the velocity of an ultrasonic pulse passing through the concrete is determined (BS 1881: Part 203). This technique is now widely used for assessing the quality of concrete in structures and several models of the apparatus are commercially available. The pulse, produced by an electro-acoustical transducer plac
ed in contact with the concrete under test, passes through the concrete and is picked up and converted into an electrical signal by a second electro-acoustical transducer (figure 14.22). The time taken by the pulse to travel through the concrete is measured by an electrical timing unit, to the nearest 0.1 us, and the pulse velocity v is calcul
ated using the relationship (formula) where L is the length of the path (m) and t is the time taken (s). The accuracy of the velocity thus obtained depends on the length of the path although after a certain length the sharpness of the signal decreases and there is no further gain in the accuracy of the measurement. Concrete thicknesses be
tween 0.1 and 15 m can be tested quite satisfactorily. Figure 14.22 Ultrasonic pulse apparatus The main advantages of the ultrasonic pulse method are that it can be employed for assessing the quality of concrete in structures and there are no restrictions concerning the shape of the concrete mass although access to the structure from both
sides is desirable. As for the dynamic modulus of elasticity, there is no unique relationship between the pulse velocity and strength as it is influenced by the concrete constituents and curing conditions. The effect of the coarse aggregate is of particular significance since its influence on the pulse velocity is more marked than its influen
ce on strength. Thus the evaluation of the quality of concrete in structures is usually made on a comparative basis and the technique is frequently employed to detect inferior parts within a structure (Tomsett, 1980). However, when the mix proportions remain constant and only one type of coarse aggregate is used then it is possible to determin
e a specific relationship between strength and pulse velocity for in situ concrete. Since the pulse velocity is affected by moisture it is important to have moisture conditions in the test specimens similar to those in the in situ concrete when establishing strength - pulse-velocity relationships. The pulse is transmitted most effectively by s
olid media and cracks or cavities are indicated by a reduction in the pulse velocity. The method is useful for a continuous assessment of the effects of deteriorating agencies such as frost and chemicals for both in situ and laboratory concrete. It can also be used to obtain values for the dynamic modulus of elasticity of concrete using the r
elationship (formula). Hardness Method The Schmidt rebound hammer is the most widely accepted instrument for measuring the surface hardness of concrete, as described in BS 1881: Part 202. A fixed mass of steel is charged with kinetic energy through a spring system by gradually pressing the plunger against the surface to be tested (figur
e 14.23). The steel mass is released and impinges on the plunger, which remains in contact with concrete. After this impact the mass rebounds and the magnitude of the rebound is a measure of the hardness of the surface, indicated by a rider on a linear scale graduated in empirical rebound numbers. When the hammer is used to test a nonvertical
surface the rebound reading is corrected because of the change in the impact energy. Figure 14.23 Schmidt hammer Hardness (rebound number) is a relative property and there can be no physical relationship between it and the other properties of concrete. Empirical relationships between rebound number and strength have been established and
in general the higher the rebound number, the greater the strength. As for the dynamic modulus of elasticity and ultrasonic pulse velocity, there is no unique relationship between rebound number and strength. For this reason it is advisable to determine the strength - hardness relationship for each concrete instead of relying on secondhand val
ues. When the hammer is used for assessing the strength of in situ concrete the test procedure and environmental conditions should be similar to those employed during calibration. Since for a given concrete the rebound number can vary because of differences in hardness between aggregate and matrix and the possible variation in aggregate minera
logy, it is necessary that several readings are taken and the average value used. Control over the preparation of the test surface is important for proper use of the hammer. Provided the limitations of the method are borne in mind and the hammer is used intelligently, it can be a useful tool for assessing the strength of concrete in structures
. It is an inexpensive mechanical device and is easy to use. The technique can also be applied to assess the uniformity of concrete, for example, to locate the possible existence of an area of unsatisfactory concrete in a wall, or to detect debonded areas in floor screeds (Chaplin, 1980). Other Methods These include the use of gamma rays
for detecting voids in concrete and for locating reinforcement, electrical methods for measuring moisture content and electromagnetic methods for measuring the depth below the concrete surface of steel reinforcing bars. Some of these are described in BS 4408: Part 1 and Part 3. Recently developed tests which are of interest for the in situ as
sessment of concrete strength are pull-out, break-off and penetration tests. The application of these tests, along with ultrasonic pulse and hardness tests, is dealt with in the British Standard Guide to Assessment of Concrete Strength in Existing Structures (BS 6089). The pull-out tests essentially involve determining the force required to pu
ll out a steel rod fixed into the surface of the concrete (Malhotra, 1975; Chabowski and Brydon-Smith, 1980). The break-off test measures the flexural strength of concrete (Johansen, 1979). The penetration test measures the resistance of concrete to penetration of a probe fixed into the surface (ASTM C 803-75). Introduction Concrete is a ma
n-made composite the major constituent of which is natural aggregate, such as gravel and sand or crushed rock. Alternatively artificial aggregates, for example, blastfurnace slag, expanded clay, broken brick and steel shot may be used where appropriate. The other principal constituent of concrete is the binding medium used to bind the aggregat
e particles together to form a hard composite material. The most commonly used binding medium is the product formed by a chemical reaction between cement and water. Other binding mediums are used on a much smaller scale for special concretes in which the cement and water of normal concretes are replaced either wholly or in part by epoxide or p
olyester resins. These polymer concretes known as resin-based or resin-additive concretes respectively are costly and generally not suitable for use where fire-resistant properties are required but they are useful for repair work and other special applications. Resin-based concretes have been used, for example, for precast chemical resistant p
ipes and lightweight drainage channels. This section deals only with normal concretes in which cement and water form the binding medium. In its hardened state concrete is a rock-like material with a high compressive strength. By virtue of the ease with which fresh concrete in its plastic state may be moulded into virtually any shape it may b
e used to advantage architecturally or solely for decorative purposes. Special surface finishes, for example, exposed aggregate, can also be used to great effect. Normal concrete has a comparatively low tensile strength and for structural applications it is normal practice either to incorporate steel bars to resist any tensile forces (reinfo
rced concrete) or to apply compressive forces to the concrete to counteract these tensile forces (prestressed concrete). Concrete is also used in conjunction with other materials, for example, it may form the compression flange of a box section the remainder of which is steel (composite construction). Concrete is used structurally in buildings
for foundations, columns, beams and slabs, in shell structures, bridges, sewage-treatment works, railway sleepers, roads, cooling towers, dams, chimneys, harbours, off-shore structures, coastal protection works and so on. It is used also for a wide range of precast concrete products which includes concrete blocks, cladding panels, pipes and l
amp standards. The impact strength, as well as the tensile strength, of normal concretes is low and this can be improved by the introduction of randomly orientated fibres into the concrete mix. Steel, polypropylene, asbestos and glass fibres have all been used with some success in precast products, for example, pipes, building panels and pile
s. Steel fibres also increase the flexural strength, or modulus of rupture, of concrete and this particular type of fibre-reinforced concrete has been used in ground paving slabs for roads where flexural and impact strength are both important. Fibre-reinforced concretes are however essentially special-purpose concretes and for most purposes th
e normal concretes described in this book are used. In addition to its potential from aesthetic considerations, concrete requires little maintenance and has good fire resistance. Concrete has other properties which may on occasions be considered less desirable, for example, the time-dependent deformations associated with drying shrinkage an
d other related phenomena. However, if the effects of environmental conditions, creep, shrinkage and loading on the dimensional changes of concrete structures and structural elements are fully appreciated, and catered for at the design stage, no subsequent difficulties in this respect should arise. A true appreciation of the relevant properti
es of any material is necessary if a satisfactory end product is to be obtained and concrete, in this respect, is no different from other materials. 2 Cements of Different Types The previous chapter dealt with the properties of Portland cement in general, and we have seen that cements differing in chemical composition and physical characte
ristics may exhibit different properties when hydrated. It should thus be possible to select mixtures of raw materials for the production of cements with various desired properties. In fact, several types of Portland cement are available commercially and additional special cements can be produced for specific uses. The various types of Portlan
d cement will now be described. Several non-Portland cements will also be discussed. Types of Portland Cement In order to facilitate the discussion, a list of different Portland cements, together with the American description where available, is given in Table 2.1. The ASTM composition limits for some of these cements have already be
en listed (Table 1.9), and typical values of compound composition are given in Table 2.2. Table 2.1: Main Types of Portland Cement Table 2.2: Typical Values of Compound Composition of Portland Cements of Different Types Many of the cements have been developed to ensure good durability of concrete under a variety of conditions. It has
not been possible, however, to find in the constitution of cement a complete answer to the problem of durability of concrete: the principle mechanical properties of hardened concrete, such as strength, shrinkage, permeability, resistance to weathering, and creep, are affected also by factors other than cement constitution, although this deter
mines to a large degree the rate of gain of strength. Figure 2.1 shows the rate of development of strength of concretes made with cements of different types: while the rates vary considerably, there is little difference in the 90-day strength of cements of all types. The general tendency is for the cements with a low rate of hardening to have
a slightly higher ultimate strength. For instance, Fig. 2.1 shows that Type IV cement has the lowest strength at 28 days but develops the second highest strength at the age of 5 years. A comparison of Fig. 2.1 and Fig. 2.2 illustrates the fact that differences between cement types are not readily quantified. Fig. 2.1. Strength development of
concretes containing 335 kg of cement per cubic metre (565 lb / yd3) and made with cements of different types Fig. 2.2. Strength development of concretes with a water / cement ratio of 0.49 made with cements of different types Also, the retrogression of strength of the concrete made with Type II cement is not characteristic of this type
of cement. The pattern of low early and high late strength agrees with the influence of the initial framework of hardened cement on the ultimate development of strength: the more slowly the framework is established the denser the gel and the higher the ultimate strength. Nevertheless, significant differences in the important physical properti
es of cements of different types are found only in the earlier stages of hydration in well-hydrated pastes the differences are only minor. The division of cements into different types is necessarily no more than a broad classification and there may sometimes be wide differences between cements of nominally the same type. On the other hand, th
ere are often no sharp discontinuities in the properties of different types of cement, and many cements can be classified as more than one type. Obtaining some special property of cement may lead to undesirable features in another respect. For this reason a balance of requirements may be necessary, and the economic aspect of manufacture must a
lso be considered. Type II cement is an example of a "compromise" all-round cement . The methods of manufacture have improved steadily over the years, and there has been a continual development of cements to serve different purposes with a corresponding change in specifications. Ordinary Portland Cement This is by far the most common
cement in use: about 90 per cent of all cement used in the United States (total production of about 24 million tonnes per annum) and a like percentage in the United Kingdom (about 17 million tonnes per annum) is of the ordinary type. Ordinary Portland cement (Type I) is admirably suitable for use in general concrete construction when there
is no exposure to sulphates in the soil or in ground water. The specification for this cement is given in BS 12: 1978. The limitations of chemical composition are: the lime saturation factor is to be not greater than 1.02 and not less than 0.66. The factor is defined as - (formula), where each term in brackets denotes the percentage by wei
ght of the given compound present in the cement. The upper limit of the lime saturation factor ensures that the amount of lime is not so high as to result in free lime appearing at the clinkering temperature in equilibrium with the liquid present. The unsoundness of cement caused by free lime was discussed in the previous chapter, and is in
deed controlled by the Le Chatelier test. But the importance of avoiding unsound cement is so great that in Britain the safeguard of controlled compound composition is considered desirable. Nevertheless, the ASTM Standard and the majority of European specifications for cement prescribe no limits of the lime content. A further requirement of BS
12: 1978 for the chemical composition of ordinary Portland cement is that the magnesia content does not exceed 4.0 per cent. Formerly, the ratio Al2O3 / Fe2O3 was specified as not less than 0.66. In addition, the insoluble residue must not exceed 1.5 per cent and the loss on ignition is limited to 3 per cent in temperate climates and 4 per ce
nt in the tropics. The maximum gypsum content is also specified (see p 18). Over the years, there have been some changes in the characteristics of ordinary Portland cement. In particular, modern cements have a higher C3S content and a greater fineness than 40 years ago. As a consequence, cements have nowadays a 28-day strength perhaps 25 MPa
higher than in 1925, but the gain in strength between 28 days and 10 years is unaltered: approximately 20 MPa (3000 psi) for continuously water-cured concrete with a water / cement ratio of about 0.53. (See Fig. 2.3.) Fig. 2.3. The rate of gain of strength of cements between 1916 and 1970 measured on standard concrete cylinders with a water
/ cement ratio of 0.53 The German classification of cements is on the basis of the 28-day strength of 1 : 3 mortars with a water / cement ratio of 0.5: 35, 45, and 55 MPa. Rapid Hardening Portland Cement This cement is very similar to ordinary Portland cement, and is also covered by BS 12: 1978. Rapid hardening Portland cement (Typ
e III), as its name implies, develops strength more rapidly, and should therefore be correctly described as high early strength cement. The rate of hardening must not be confused with the rate of setting: in fact, the two cements have similar setting times. The strength developed by the rapid hardening Portland cement at the age of three days
is of the same order as the 7-day strength of ordinary Portland cement with the same water / cement ratio but the British Standards no longer specify 7-day strength. The expected rate of hardening is reflected in the minimum strengths specified by BS 12: 1978, listed in Table 1.10. The increased rate of gain of strength of the rapid hardening
cement is achieved by a higher C3S content, sometimes as high as 70 per cent, and by finer grinding of the cement clinker. BS 12:1978 prescribes a minimum fineness of 325m2 / kg, but as a rule a higher fineness is encountered. Ordinary Portland cement manufactured in Great Britain is invariably finer than the 225 m2 / kg prescribed by BS 12
:197 - often above 300m2 / kg. Many plants also produce cement with a high C3S content so that sometimes in practice there is little difference between rapid hardening and some ordinary cements; this cannot, however, be assumed to be the rule (see p. 333). The requirements of soundness and chemical composition are the same for rapid hardening
as for ordinary Portland cement and need not therefore be repeated. The use of rapid hardening cement is indicated where a rapid strength development is desired, e.g. when formwork is to be removed early for re-use, or where sufficient strength for further construction is wanted as quickly as practicable. Rapid hardening cement is only about
$4 (f2) per tonne dearer than ordinary cement, and it is not surprising that rapid hardening cement is used extensively, accounting for about 10 per cent of all cement manufactured in the United Kingdom. Since, however, the rapid gain of strength means a high rate of heat development, rapid hardening Portland cement should not be used in mass
construction or in large structural sections. On the other hand, for construction at low temperatures the use of cement with a high rate of heat liberation may prove a satisfactory safeguard against early frost damage. Special Rapid Hardening Portland Cements There exist several specially manufactured cements which are particularly rapi
d hardening. One of these, a so-called extra rapid hardening Portland cement, is obtained by intergrinding calcium chloride with rapid hardening Portland cement. The quantity of calcium chloride should not exceed 2 per cent. Because calcium chloride is deliquescent it is vital to store extra rapid hardening cement under dry conditions, and it
should generally be used within one month of despatch from the cement plant. Extra rapid hardening cement is suitable for cold weather concreting, or when a very high early strength is required, but structural use with reinforcement is not permitted by the British Code of Practice CP 110: 1972 because of the risk of corrosion, and the cement i
s no longer manufactured in the United Kingdom. The strength of extra rapid hardening cement is about 25 per cent higher than that of rapid hardening cement at 1 or 2 days and 10 to 20 per cent higher at 7 days. The setting time of extra rapid hardening cement is short: depending on temperature it can be 5 to 30 minutes so that early placing i
s essential. Shrinkage is rather higher than when rapid hardening Portland cement is used. If extra rapid hardening cement is not available it is possible to use rapid hardening Portland cement whose speed of hardening is increased by means of an addition of calcium chloride immediately prior to mixing the concrete. In this case, calcium chlor
ide can be classified as an accelerator; its effects are discussed on p. 101. Another type of cement with very rapid hardening properties is the so-called ultra high early strength Portland cement, marketed in Great Britain. This cement contains no admixture and is therefore suitable for use in reinforced and prestressed concrete; the rapid s
trength development is due to the very high fineness of the cement: 700 to 900 m2 / kg. Because of this, the gypsum content has to be higher (4 per cent expressed as SO3) than in cements complying with BS 12: 1978, but in all other respects the ultra high early strength cement satisfies the requirement of that standard. We may note that the hi
gh gypsum content has no adverse effect on long-term soundness as the gypsum is used up in the early reactions of hydration. The cement is manufactured by separating fines from rapid hardening Portland cement by a cyclone air elutriator. Because of its high fineness, the ultra high early strength cement has a low bulk density and deteriorates
rapidly on exposure. High fineness leads to rapid hydration, and therefore to a high rate of heat generation at early ages and to a rapid strength development; for instance, the 3-day strength of rapid hardening Portland cement is reached at 16 hours, and the 7-day strength at 24 hours. There is, however, little gain in strength beyond 28 days
. Typical strengths of 1 : 3 concretes made with the ultra high early strength cement are given in Table 2.3. Table 2.3: Typical Values of Strength of a 1 : 3 Concrete made with Ultra High Early Strength Portland Cement The cement has been used successfully in a number of structures where early prestressing or putting in service is of im
portance. Shrinkage and creep are not significantly different from those obtained with other cements when the mix proportions are the same; in the case of creep, the comparison has to be made on the basis of the same stress / strength ratio (see p. 401). We should note, however, that for the same mix proportions, the use of ultra high early str
ength cement results in lower workability. The ultra high early strength Portland cement is marketed as Swiftcrete. A somewhat less fine cement is Speed cement, developed in Belgium. It contains no accelerator and has a specific surface of 450 to 500 m2 / kg. The standard vibrated mortar cube test gives strengths of about 28 MPa (4000 psi) a
t 1 day, 48 MPa (7000 psi) at 3 days, and 68 MPa (9800 psi) at 28 days. The Speed cement is suitable for winter concreting or for urgent jobs such as road repair, well-sealing, etc. In some countries, e.g. Italy and Sweden, extremely high early strength cement is manufactured by double burning in the kiln. One more cement of the very high ea
rly strength cement variety should be mentioned. This is the so-called regulated-set cement, or jet cement, developed in the U.S. The cement consists essentially of a mixture of Portland cement and calcium fluoro-aluminate (C11A7.CaF2) with an appropriate retarder (usually citric acid). The setting time of the cement can vary between 1 and 30
minutes (the strength development being slower the slower the setting) and is controlled in the manufacture of the cement as the raw materials are interground and burnt together. Grinding is difficult because of hardness differences. The early strength development is controlled by the content of calcium fluoro-aluminate: when this is 5 per ce
nt, about 6 MPa (900 psi) can be achieved at 1 hour; a 50 per cent mixture will produce 20 MPa (3000 psi) at the same time. These values are based on a mix with a cement content of 330 kg / m3 (560 lb / yd3). The later strength development is similar to that of the parent Portland cement but at room temperature there is virtually no gain in str
ength between 1 and 3 days. Regulated-set cement is manufactured in Japan, Austria and Germany, where it is known as Schnellzement. Low Heat Portland Cement The rise in temperature in the interior of a large concrete mass due to the heat developed by the hydration of cement can lead to serious cracking (see p. 424). For this reason, it
is necessary to limit the rate of heat evolution of the cement used in this type of structure: a greater proportion of the heat can then be dissipated and a lower rise in temperature results. Cement having such a low rate of heat development was first produced for use in large gravity dams in the United States, and is known as low heat Portl
and cement (Type IV). BS 1370 : 1979 limits the heat of hydration of this cement to 250 J per gram (60 cal / g) at the age of 7 days, and 290 J per gram (70 cal / g) at 28 days. The limits of lime content of low heat Portland cement, after correction for the lime combined with SO3, are - (formula). The rather lower content of the more ra
pidly hydrating compounds, C3S and C3A, results in a slower development of strength of low heat cement as compared with ordinary Portland cement, but the ultimate strength is unaffected. In any case, to ensure a sufficient rate of gain of strength the specific surface of the cement must be not less than 320 m2 / kg. A low heat Portland blast-
furnace cement is also available; this is covered by BS 4246 : 1974. In the United States, Portland-pozzolana cement Type P can be specified to be of the low heat variety; the Type IP Portland-pozzolana cement can be required to have moderate heat of hydration. ASTM Standard C 595-79 deals with these cements. In some applications a very low e
arly strength may be a disadvantage, and for this reason a so-called modified (Type II) cement was developed in the United States. This modified cement successfully combines a somewhat higher rate of heat development than that of low heat cement with a rate of gain of strength similar to that of ordinary Portland cement. Modified cement is reco
mmended for use in structures where a moderately low heat generation is desirable or where moderate sulphate attack may occur. This cement is extensively used in the United States. Modified cement, referred to as Type II cement, and low heat cement (Type IV) are covered by ASTM Specification C 150 -78a. Sulphate-resisting Cement In di
scussing the reactions of hydration of cement, and in particular the setting process, mention was made of the reaction between C3A and gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O) and of the consequent formation of calcium sulphoaluminate. In hardened cement, calcium aluminate hydrate can react with a sulphate salt from outside the concrete in a similar manner: the pro
duct of addition is calcium sulphoaluminate, forming within the framework of the hydrated cement paste. Since the increase in the volume of the solid phase is 227 per cent, gradual disintegration of concrete results. A second type of reaction is that of base exchange between calcium hydroxide and the sulphates, resulting in the formation of gy
psum with an increase in the volume of the solid phase of 124 per cent. These reactions are known as sulphate attack. The salts particularly active are magnesium and sodium sulphate. Sulphate attack is greatly accelerated if accompanied by alternate wetting and drying, as is the case for instance, in a marine structure in the zone between the
tides (see Chapter 7). The remedy lies in the use of cement with a low C3A content, and such cement is known as sulphate-resisting Portland cement. The British Standard for this cement, BS 4027 : 1980, stipulates a C3A content of 3.5 per cent. The minimum fineness is 250 m2 / kg. In other respects, sulphate-resisting cement is expected to co
nform to BS 12 : 1978 for ordinary Portland cement. In the United States, sulphate-resisting cement is known as Type V cement and is covered by ASTM Standard C 150-78a. This specification limits the C3A content to 5 per cent, and also restricts the total content of C4AF plus twice the C3A content to 20 per cent. The magnesia content is limited
to 6 per cent. The role of C4AF is not quite clear. From the chemical standpoint C4AF would be expected to form calcium sulphoaluminate, as well as calcium sulphoferrite , and thus cause expansion. It seems, however, that the action of calcium sulphate on hydrated cement is smaller the lower the Al2O3 : Fe2O3 ratio. Some solid solutions are
formed and they are liable to comparatively little attack. The tetracalcium ferrite is even more resistant, and it may form a protective film over any free calcium aluminate. Since it is often not feasible to reduce the Al2O3 content of the raw material, Fe2O3 may be added to the mix so that the C4AF content increases at the expense of C3A.
An example of a cement with a very low Al2O3 : Fe2O3 ratio is the Ferrari cement, in whose manufacture iron oxide is substituted for some of the clay. A similar cement is produced in Germany under the name of Erz cement. The name of iron ore cement is also used for this type of cement. The low C3A and comparatively low C4AF contents of sulph
ate-resisting cement mean that it has a high silicate content and this gives the cement a high strength but, because C2S represents a high proportion of the silicates, the early strength is low. The heat developed by sulphate-resisting cement is not much higher than that of low heat cement. It could therefore be argued that sulphate-resisting
cement is theoretically an ideal cement, but because of the special requirements for the composition of the raw materials used in its manufacture, sulphate-resisting cement cannot be generally and cheaply made. Provision for a low-alkali sulphate-resisting cement is made in BS 4027 : 1980. Portland Blast-furnace Cement This type of cem
ent is made by intergrinding Portland cement clinker and granulated blast-furnace slag, the proportion of the latter not exceeding 65 per cent of the weight of the mixture, as prescribed by BS 146 : 1973. Slag is a waste product in the manufacture of pig iron, the amounts of iron and slag obtained being of the same order. The slag is a mixture
of lime, silica, and alumina, that is the same oxides that make up Portland cement, but not in the same proportions. While it is not possible to give ranges of values it may be noted that a slag known to be satisfactory had the following composition: 42 per cent lime, 30 per cent silica, 19 per cent alumina, 5 per cent magnesia, and 1 per cent
alkalis. Blast-furnace slag varies greatly in composition and physical structure depending on the processes used and on the method of cooling of the slag. For use in the manufacture of blast-furnace cement the slag has to be quenched so that it solidifies as a glass, crystallization being largely prevented. This rapid cooling by water result
s also in a fragmentation of the material into a granulated form. Slag can make a cementitious material in different ways. Firstly, it can be used together with limestone as a raw material for the conventional manufacture of portland cement. Clinker made from these materials is often used (together with slag) in the manufacture of portland bla
st-furnace cement. The latter cement represents the second major use of slag. Dry granulated slag is fed with Portland cement clinker into a grinding mill, gypsum being added in order to control setting. It may be noted that slag is harder than clinker so that intergrinding presents some difficulties. Portland blast-furnace cement has been m
anufactured in Scotland for a number years, and is also made in the United States (by intergrinding or by blending) where it is known as Type IS cement, and is covered by ASTM C 595-79. Portland blast-furnace cement is used also in Germany, under the name of Eisenportland (up to 35 per cent slag) and Hochofen cements (36 to 85 per cent slag),
and in France where the most common ones are ciment metallurgique mixte (50 per cent slag) and ciment de haut fourneau (65 to 75 per cent slag). In the Netherlands, the slag content may be as high as 85 per cent. A Belgian development is the Trief process in which wet-ground granulated slag is fed in the form of a slurry direct into the concr
ete mixer, together with Portland cement and aggregate. The cost of drying the slag is thus avoided, and grinding in the wet state results in a greater fineness than would be obtained with dry grinding for the same power input. A variant used in Britain under the name of Cemsave and in South Africa known as Slagment is a process where dry-gro
und granulated slag of the same fineness as cement is added at the mixer as a partial replacement of Portland cement; Portland blast-furnace cement concrete is thus manufactured in situ. Like Portland blast-furnace cement concrete, Cemsave concrete has a lower early strength than when Portland cement only is used, but at later ages at least equ
al strengths are reached However, with Cemsave the workability is somewhat higher so that some reduction in water / (cement plus slag) ratio is possible compared with the water / cement ratio of a Portland cement mix with the same aggregate content. Concrete with Cemsave exhibits a significantly smaller temperature rise during hydration. Also
, the coefficient of thermal expansion is reduced by some 10 per cent compared with a similar Portland cement mix, possibly due to a lower moisture content. The exact nature of hydration of Portland blast-furnace cement is not quite clear. The Portland cement component hydrates in the normal manner and it appears that the calcium hydroxide t
hus liberated gives the correct alkalinity needed to provide a "starter" for the hydration of the granulated slag. However, the further hydration of the slag is direct and does not depend on combination with lime. Portland blast-furnace cement is in many respects similar to ordinary Portland cement, and BS 146 : 1973 requirements for fineness
, setting times and soundness are the same for both cements. In actual fact, the fineness of Portland blast-furnace cement tends to be higher, but even so the rate of hardening of Portland blast-furnace cement is somewhat slower during the first 28 days, and adequate curing is therefore of importance; the strength requirements of BS 146 : 1973
are therefore lower than for ordinary Portland cement the requirement for a 28-day strength is 34 MPa (4900 psi) for mortar cubes or 22 MPa (3200 psi) for concrete cubes. However, at later ages there is little difference between the strengths of Portland blast-furnace and ordinary Portland cements. Fig. 2.4 shows typical strength - time cur
ves. Fig. 2.4. Strength development of concretes made with Portland blast-furnace cement (water / cement ratio = 0.6) The heat of hydration of Portland blast-furnace cement is lower than that of ordinary Portland cement so that the former can be used in mass concrete structures. (The cement should then comply with BS 4246: 1974, which co
vers low-heat Portland blast-furnace cement; this allows a longer final setting time and a lower strength than BS 1370:1979.) However, in cold weather the low heat of hydration of Portland blast-furnace cement, coupled with a moderately low rate of strength development, can lead to frost damage. Because of its fairly high sulphate resistance,
the C3A content being low, Portland blast-furnace cement is frequently used in sea-water construction. Shrinkage and modulus of elasticity of concrete made with Portland blast-furnace cement are the same as when Portland cement is used. Creep is also unaffected, except that it is larger under drying conditions. The relatively low energy requi
rement in the manufacture of Portland blast-furnace cement may be of interest in these energy-conscious times, and this cement is already extensively used in many countries which have a large production of slag. For instance, in the Netherlands, 60 per cent of all cement used is of the Portland blast-furnace type. Supersulphated Cement
Because it is made from granulated blast-furnace slag, supersulphated cement will be considered at this stage, even though it is not a Portland cement. Supersulphated cement is made by intergrinding a mixture of 80 to 85 per cent of granulated slag with 10 to 15 per cent of calcium sulphate (in the form of dead-burnt gypsum or anhydrite) and
about 5 per cent of Portland cement clinker. A fineness of 400 to 500 m2 / kg is usual. The cement has to be stored under very dry conditions as otherwise it deteriorates rapidly. Supersulphated cement is used extensively in Belgium, where it is known as ciment metallurgique sursulfate, in France, and was previously manufactured in Germany (un
der the name of Sulfathuttenzement). In the United Kingdom, the cement is covered by the British Standard BS 4248: 1974, but, because of production difficulties, the manufacture of the cement has been discontinued. The cement is highly resistant to sea water and can withstand the highest concentrations of sulphates normally found in soil or gr
ound water, and is also resistant to peaty acids and to oils. Concrete with a water / cement ratio not greater than 0.45 has been found not to deteriorate in contact with weak solutions of mineral acids of pH down to 3.5. For these reasons, supersulphated cement is used in the construction of sewers and in contaminated ground, although it has
been suggested that this cement is less resistant than sulphate-resisting Portland cement when the sulphate concentration exceeds 1 per cent. The heat of hydration of supersulphated cement is low: about 170 to 190 J / g (40 to 45 cal / g) at 7 days, and 190 to 210 J / g (45 to 50 cal / g) at 28 days. The cement is therefore suitable for mass
concrete construction but care must be taken if used in cold weather as the rate of strength development is considerably reduced at low temperatures. The rate of hardening of supersulphated cement increases with temperature up to about 50 C (122 F), but at higher temperatures anomalous behaviour has been encountered. For this reason, steam curi
ng above 50 C (122 F) should not be used without prior tests. It may also be noted that supersulphated cement should not be mixed with Portland cements because the lime released by the hydration of an excessive amount of the latter interferes with the reaction between the slag and the calcium sulphate. Wet curing for not less than four days
after casting is essential as premature drying out results in a friable or powdery surface layer, especially in hot weather, but the depth of this layer does not increase with time. Table 2.4: Typical Values of Strength of Supersulphated Cement Supersulphated cement combines chemically with more water than is required for the hydration of
Portland cement, so that concrete with a water / cement ratio of less than 0.4 should not be made. Mixes leaner than about 1 : 6 are not recommended. The decrease in strength with an increase in the water / cement ratio has been reported to be smaller than in other cements but, since the early strength development depends on the type of slag
used in the manufacture of the cement, it is advisable to determine the actual strength characteristics prior to use. Typical strengths attainable are given in Table 2.4. It should be noted that for the concrete test BS 4248: 1974 prescribes a water / cement ratio of 0.55 instead of 0.60 used with other cements . Portland-pozzolana Cements
and Pozzolanas The first of these is the name given to interground or blended mixtures of Portland cement and pozzolana. Pozzolana is a natural or artificial material containing silica in a reactive form. A more formal definition of ASTM Specification C 618-78 describes pozzolana as a siliceous or siliceous and aluminous material which in
itself possesses little or no cementitious value but will, in finely divided form and in the presence of moisture, chemically react with calcium hydroxide at ordinary temperatures to form compounds possessing cementitious properties. It is essential that pozzolana be in a finely divided state as it is only then that silica can combine with cal
cium hydroxide (liberated by the hydrating Portland cement) in the presence of water to form stable calcium silicates which have cementitious properties. Pozzolanic materials most commonly met with are: volcanic ash - the original pozzolana - pumicite, opaline shales and cherts, calcined diatomaceous earth, burnt clay, fly ash, etc. In consider
ing pozzolanas in general, we should note that the silica has to be amorphous, as crystalline silica has very low reactivity. Some pozzolanas may create problems because of their physical properties; e.g. diatomaceous earth, because of its angular and porous form, requires a high water content. Certain natural pozzolanas improve their activit
y by calcination in the range of 550 C to 1100 C, depending on the material. Rice husks burnt at 450 C have been found to produce a pozzolana conforming to the requirements of the earlier ASTM Standard C 618-72, but their use leads to increased shrinkage. For an assessment of pozzolanic activity with cement, ASTM Standard C 618-78 prescribes t
he measurement of a pozzolanic activity index. This is established by the determination of strength of mixtures with a specified replacement of cement by pozzolana. There is also a pozzolanic activity index with lime, which determines the total activity of a pozzolana. According to BS 4550: Part 2:1970, pozzolanicity is assessed by comparing t
he quantity of Ca(OH)2 present in a liquid phase in contact with the hydrated pozzolanic cement with the quantity of Ca(OH)2 capable of saturating a medium of the same alkalinity. The underlying principle is that the pozzolanic activity consists of fixing of Ca(OH)2 by the pozzolana so that the lower the resulting quantity of Ca(OH)2 the higher
the pozzolanicity. Pozzolanicity is still imperfectly understood; specific surface and chemical composition are known to play an important role but, since they are inter-related, the problem is complex. It has been suggested that, in addition to reacting with Ca(OH)2, pozzolanas react also with C3A or its products of hydration. A good revie
w of the subject of pozzolanicity has been written by Massazza and Costa. Fly Ash Fly ash, known also as pulverised-fuel ash (see p. 609), is the ash precipated electrostatically from the exhaust fumes of coal-fired power stations, and is the most common artificial pozzolana; an extensive review has been written by Berry and Malhotra. The
fly ash particles are spherical (which is advantageous from the water requirement point of view) and are of at least the same fineness as cement (although with fewer very fine particles) so that the silica is readily available for reaction. The pozzolanic activity of fly ash is in no doubt, but it is essential that it has a constant fineness
and a constant carbon content. The two are often interdependent since the carbon particles tend to be coarser. Modern boiler plants produce fly ash with a carbon content of about 3 per cent but much higher values are encountered in fly ash from older plants. British Standard BS 3892: 1965 lays down a maximum loss on ignition of 7 per cent, bu
t probably a carbon content up to 12 per cent is acceptable. It is not clear why carbon may be harmful but, of course, it is not pozzolanic and is therefore no more than a filler. The importance of uniformity of properties of fly ash cannot be overestimated, as otherwise it is difficult to maintain the uniformity of the resulting concrete. Brit
ish Standard BS 3892: 1965 specifies three zones of fineness so that uniform supply can be assured. The residue on the 45 um sieve is a convenient basis of classification of size. The main requirements of ASTM Standard C 618-78 are: a minimum content of 70 per cent of silica, alumina and ferric oxide all together, a maximum SO3 content of 5 pe
r cent, a maximum loss on ignition of 12 per cent, and a maximum alkali content (expressed as Na2O) of 1.5 per cent. The latter value is applicable only when the fly ash is to be used with reactive aggregate. British Standard BS 3892: 1965 specifies a maximum MgO content of 4 per cent and SO3 of 2 5 per cent. It should be noted that fly ash
may affect the colour of the resulting concrete. Recently, high-lime ashes originating from lignite coal have entered the pozzolana market. They do not satisfy the existing specifications and may have a lime content as high as 24 per cent. High-lime ash has hydraulic properties of its own but, since its lime will combine with the silica and a
lumina portions of the ash, there will be less of these compounds to react with the lime liberated by the hydration of cement. The carbon content is low, the fineness is high, and the colour is light. However, the MgO content can be high, and some of the MgO as well as some of the lime can lead to deleterious expansion. The behaviour of high
-lime ashes is sensitive to temperature: specifically, in mass concrete when a rise in temperature occurs, the products of reaction may not be of high strength. However, the development of strength is not simply related to temperature, being satisfactory in the region of 120 to 150 C (250 to 300 F) but not at about 200 C (about 400 F) when the
products of reaction are substantially different. The testing of this type of ash is still being developed but future use is possible. Use of Pozzolanas It is not possible to make a generalized statement on the Portland-pozzolana cements because the rate of strength development depends on the activity of the pozzolanas and on the proport
ion of Portland cement in the mixture. As a rule, however, Portland-pozzolana cements gain strength very slowly and require, therefore, curing over a comparatively long period, but their ultimate strength is approximately the same as that of ordinary Portland cement alone. A typical strength curve is shown in Fig. 2.5. Fig. 2.5. Strength de
velopment of concrete made with Portland cement and fly ash ASTM Standard C 595-79 describes Portland-pozzolana cement as Type IP for general concrete construction and Type P for use when high strengths at early ages are not required, and limits the pozzolana content to between 15 and 40 per cent of the weight of the Portland-pozzolana ceme
nt. In the United Kingdom, Portland-pozzolana cement with up to 35 per cent of fly ash appeared on the market in 1980. Pozzolanas may often be cheaper than the Portland cement that they replace but their chief advantage lies in slow hydration and, therefore, low rate of heat development: this is of great importance in mass concrete constructi
on, and it is there that Portland-pozzolana cement or a partial replacement of Portland cement by the pozzolana is mostly used. Portland-pozzolana cements show also good resistance to sulphate attack and to some other destructive agents. This is so because the pozzolanic reaction leaves less lime to be leached out and also reduces that permea
bility of concrete. However, the resistance to freezing and thawing cannot be developed until later ages when significant pozzolanic reaction has reduced the porosity of the paste. It should be remembered that pozzolanas vary very considerably in their effects, both good and bad, and it is advisable to test any untried pozzolanic material in co
mbination with the cement and the aggregate which are to be used in the actual construction. The use of fly ash with sulphate-resisting Portland cement is not allowed according to British Code of Practice CP 110: 1972 and BS 5328: 1976 when resistance to sulphate attack is required. This view is not necessarily correct (see page 447). When p
ozzolanas are used as a partial replacement for cement, the cement and the pozzolanas are batched separately and mixed with the other ingredients in the concrete mixer. The required properties (pozzolanas for such a purpose are prescribed by ASTM Standard 618-78. Partial replacement of Portland cement by pozzolana has to be carefully defined,
as the specific gravity of pozzolanas is much lower than that cement; for instance, the specific gravity of fly ash is 1.9 to 2.4, compared with 3.15 for cement. Thus replacement by weight results in a considerably greater volume of the cementitious material in the mix. With replacement, concrete mixes have a lower early strength than when Por
tland cement is used, but beyond about three months there is no loss of strength. With lean mixes, there may even be a long-term gain of strength due to the replacement (see Fig. 2.6). If equal early strength is required and pozzolana is to be used (e.g. because of alkali - aggregate reactivity) then addition of pozzolana rather than partial re
placement of cement is necessary. For instance, when fly ash is used in lean mixes, almost 100 kg (220 lb) pozzolana may be necessary to replace 50 kg (110 lb) of cement, but the amount of pozzolana is lower in rich mixes. Because the continuing formation of hydrates fills the pores and also because of the absence of free lime which could be
reached out, partial replacement of Portland cement by pozzolana reduces the permeability of concrete: a 7- to 10-fold reduction has been reported. Fig. 2.6. Effect of partial replacement of Portland cement by pozzolana on the strength development of concrete made with 167 kg of "cement" material per cubic metre of concrete (282 lb / yd3)
It must be remembered that, although pozzolana may be cheaper than Portland cement, the use of an additional material on site (and especially of an extremely fine one) results in additional cost. However, energy considerations as well as technical reasons have led to renewed interest in the material. It is very likely that the 1980s will see
an extensive use of portland-pozzolana cements. Indeed, the U.S. government is proposing to specify the use of fly ash in all appropriate construction involving Federal funds. White Cement For architectural purposes white concrete or, particularly in tropical countries, a pastel colour paint finish are sometimes required. To achieve b
est results it is advisable to use white cement with, of course, a suitable fine aggregate and, if the surface is to be treated, also coarse aggregate. This type of cement has also the advantage that it is not liable to cause staining, since it has, low content of soluble alkalis. White Portland cement is made from raw materials containing ve
ry little iron oxide and manganese oxide. China clay is generally used, together with chalk or limestone, free from specified impurities. Oil is used as fuel for the kiln in order to avoid contamination by coal ash. Since iron acts as a flux in clinkering, its absence necessitates higher kiln temperatures but sometimes cryolite (sodium alumini
um fluoride) is added as a flux. Contamination of the cement with iron during grinding has also to be avoided. For this reason, instead of the usual ball mill, the rather inefficient pebble grinding or nickel and molybdenum alloy balls are used. The cost of grinding is thus higher, and this, coupled with the more expensive raw materials, make
s white cement rather expensive (about double the price of ordinary Portland cement). Because of this, white cement concrete is often used in the form of a facing placed against ordinary concrete backing, but great care is necessary to ensure full bond between the two concretes. To obtain good colour, white concrete of rich-mix proportions is
generally used, the water / cement ratio being not higher than about 0.4. A possible saving in some cases can be achieved by a partial replacement of white cement by blast-furnace slag, which has a very light colour. When a pastel colour is required white concrete can be used as a base for painting. Alternatively, pigments can be added to the
mixer, but it is essential that the pigments do not affect adversely the development of strength of the cement or affect air entrainment. For instance, carbon black reduces the air content of the mix. For this reason, some pigments are marketed in the U.S.A. with an interground air-entraining agent; it is of course essential to be aware of thi
s at the mix design stage. Mixing of concrete with pigments is not common because it is rather difficult to maintain a uniform colour of the resulting concrete. An improvement in the dispersion of the pigment can be obtained by the use of superplasticizers (see p. 110). A better way to obtain a uniform and durable coloured concrete is to use
coloured cement. This consists of white cement interground with 2 to 10 per cent of pigment. Specifications for the use of this type of cement are given by the individual manufacturers of this rather specialized product. The specification for pigments is given in BS 1014 : 1975. Because the pigment is not cementitious, slightly richer mixes t
han usual should be used. A typical compound composition of white Portland cement is given in Table 2.5 but the C3S and C2S contents may vary widely. White cement has a slightly lower specific gravity than ordinary Portland cement, generally between 3.05 and 3.10. The strength of white Portland cement is usually lower than that of ordinary Po
rtland cement but white cement nevertheless satisfies the requirements of BS 12: 1978. Table 2.5: Typical Compound Composition of white Portland Cement White high-alumina cement is also made; this is considered on p. 100. Other Portland Cements Among the numerous cements developed for special uses, anti-bacterial cement is of inter
est. It is a Portland cement interground with an anti-bacterial agent which prevents microbiological fermentation. This bacterial action is encountered in concrete floors of food processing plants where the leaching out of cement by acids is followed by fermentation caused by bacteria in the presence of moisture. Anti-bacterial cement can als
o be successfully used in swimming pools, public baths and similar places where bacteria or fungi are present. Another special cement is the so-called hydrophobic cement, which deteriorates very little during prolonged storage under unfavourable conditions. This cement is obtained by intergrinding Portland cement with 0.1 to 0.4 per cent of o
leic acid. Stearic acid or pentachlorophenol can also be used. These additions increase the grindability of clinker, probably due to electrostatic forces resulting from a polar orientation of the acid molecules on the surface of the cement particles. Oleic acid reacts with alkalis in cement to form calcium and sodium oleates which foam, so tha
t air-entraining results. When this is not desired a detraining agent, such as tri-n-butyl phosphate, has to be added during grinding. The hydrophobic properties are due to the formation of a water repellent film around each particle of cement. This film is broken during the mixing of the concrete, and normal hydration takes place but early
strength is rather low. Hydrophobic cement is similar in appearance to ordinary Portland cement but has a characteristic musty smell. In handling, the cement seems more fluid than other Portland cements. Hydrophobic cement should not be confused with waterproofed cements, which are claimed to make a more impermeable concrete than ordinary Po
rtland cement. There is considerable controversy about the effectiveness of these waterproofed cements. Masonry cement, used in mortar in brickwork, is made by intergrinding very finely ground Portland cement, limestone and an air-entraining agent, or alternatively Portland cement and hydrated lime, granulated slag or an inert filler, and an
air-entraining agent. Masonry cements make a more plastic mortar than ordinary Portland cement, they also have a greater water-retaining power and lead to lower shrinkage. The strength of masonry cements is lower than that of ordinary Portland cement, particularly since a high air content is introduced, but this low strength is generally an a
dvantage in brick construction Masonry cement must not be used in structural concrete. Finally, mention should be made of blended Portland cements. It will be recalled that, in most countries, specifications for Portland cement do not allow any addition to clinker other than gypsum and water. With moves to save energy, the idea to add some i
nert filler to Portland cement has been advanced; this then would be blended Portland cement The most likely filler is limestone ground to the same fineness as Portland cement, the proportion of the addition being 10 to 15 per cent of the total. The filler has no cementitious value but it improves workability, and blended Portland cements are
likely to become extensively used in low-strength concrete. Indeed, one can argue that, for many purposes, the existing high-quality Portland cements are too good, so that there is intrinsic merit, and not only energy saving, in this development. In a non-explicit way, some dilutants of Portland cement are allowed in the United States, as AS
TM Standard C 465-74 allows processing additions, providing they do not reduce the strength of the cement by more than 5 per cent. ASTM has also set up a sub-committee to consider a possible standard for blended cements. Finland already allows 15 per cent of filler, and East Germany produces blended cements with 20 per cent of filler. In Switz
erland, there is a blended cement with a maximum slag content of 5 per cent. In France, a 1979 specification provides for a ciment portland compose with up to 35 per cent of additive which, at least in theory, can be entirely in the form of a filler; in practice, 10 to 15 per cent is used. A filler is defined in this specification as a finely-g
round material which, owing to its physical properties, influences some properties of cement, such as workability, permeability, capillarity, and cracking. Appropriate specifications in other countries are expected in the near future. It may be noted that some of the inert components of blended cements are perhaps not entirely inert. For ins
tance, it has been found by Zielinska that CaCO3 reacts with C3A and C4AF to produce 3CaO.Al2O3.CaCO3.11H2O. There is one caveat about the use of blended cements: it is important to know whether a given cement is "pure" or blended, and proper classification and labelling are desirable. Moreover, we need reliable information on the durability
of concrete made with blended cements, especially under conditions of wetting and drying or freezing and thawing: absorption of water by capillary action may play a role here. Nevertheless, in the future, a more extensive use of blended cements in the lower grades of concrete is likely. Natural Cement This is the name given to a cemen
t obtained by calcining and grinding a so-called cement rock, which is a clayey limestone containing up to 25 per cent of argillaceous material. The resulting cement is similar to Portland cement, and is really intermediate between Portland cement and hydraulic lime. Since natural cement is calcined at temperatures too low for sintering, it c
ontains practically no C3S and is therefore slow hardening. Natural cements are rather variable in quality as adjustment of composition by blending is not possible. Because of this, as well as for economic reasons, natural cements are nowadays little used. In the United States, natural cements represent no more than one per cent of the product
ion of all Portland cements. Expansive Cements For many purposes it would be advantageous to use a cement which does not change in volume owing to drying shrinkage or, in special cases, even expands on hardening. Concrete containing such a cement expands in the first few days of its life, and a form of pre-stress is obtained by restrain
ing this expansion with steel reinforcement: steel is put in tension and concrete in compression. Restraint by external means is also possible. Cements of this type have been developed by H. Lossier in France, who used a mixture of Portland cement, an expanding agent, and a stabilizer. The expanding agent is obtained by burning a mixture of
gypsum, bauxite, and chalk, which form calcium sulphate and calcium aluminate (mainly C5A3) In the presence of water, these compounds react to form calcium sulphoaluminate hydrate (ettringite), with an accompanying expansion of the paste. The stabilizer, which is blast-furnace slag, slowly takes up the excess calcium sulphate and brings expan
sion to an end. Very careful proportioning of the cement ingredients is necessary in order to obtain the desired expansion. Generally, about 8 to 20 parts of the "sulphoaluminate" clinker are mixed with 100 parts of Portland cement and 15 parts of the stabilizer. Another type of expanding cement, called high-energy expanding cement, is made b
y intergrinding Portland cement clinker, high-alumina cement clinker, and gypsum, approximately in the proportions 65 : 20 : 15. Expansion is due to the formation of calcium sulphoaluminate, as in Lossier's cement, and takes place within 2 or 3 days of casting. This is Type M cement in the classification of the ASTM Standard C 845-76T. High-
energy expanding cement is quick-setting and rapid-hardening, reaching a strength of about 7 MPa (1000 psi) in 6 hours, and 50 MPa (7000 psi) in 28 days. The cement has a high resistance to sulphate attack. A more recent development is expanding cement known as Type K in the ASTM classification, developed in California. The ingredients of thi
s cement are similar to those used by Lossier, but the material selection and clinkering conditions (maximum temperature of about 1300 C) of the expanding agent lead to the formation of an anhydrous calcium sulphoaluminate (C4A3.SO3). The expansion is due to the formation of hydrated calcium sulphoaluminate (ettringite), as in Lossier's cement
, but the rate and magnitude of expansion appear to be more reliable. A similar expanding agent is manufactured in Japan, but intermixing with cement is done in the mixer. There exists also a Type S cement which has a high C3A content and an amount of interground calcium sulphate above that which is usual in Portland cement. Since the devel
opment of expansion takes place only as long as the concrete is moist, curing must be carefully controlled, and the use of expanding cement requires skill and experience. The use of admixtures demands special care as they may affect expansion, but there are no problems with air entrainment. Strictly speaking, the use of expanding cement canno
t produce "shrinkless" concrete, as shrinkage takes place after the moist curing has ceased, but the magnitude of expansion can be adjusted so that the expansion and the subsequent shrinkage are numerically equal. There are some practical difficulties still to be resolved in order to ensure the required expansion under variable site condit
ions. The important requirement is that CaO, SO3, and especially Al2O3, become available for ettringite formation at the right time. Specifically, a major part of it must form after a certain strength has been attained; otherwise, the expansive force will be dissipated in the deformation of the still plastic concrete and no stress against the
restraint will result. On the other hand, if the ettringite continues to form rapidly for too long, disruptive expansion may occur. The controlling factors are the presence of CaSO4 and the ratio of sulphate to aluminate in the paste. A complicating factor arises from the fineness of the cement: for a given sulphate content, the greater the f
ineness the smaller the expansion: doubling the fineness halves the expansion. Also, clearly, the higher the cement content of the concrete the higher its expansion. Likewise, expansion is greater the higher the modulus of elasticity of the aggregate. Concretes based on expanding cements have been classified by the American Concrete Institut
e: two basic types are recognized. Shrinkage-compensating concrete induces compressive stresses which approximately offset the tensile stresses induced by shrinkage (about 0.2 to 0.7 MPa (30 to 100 psi)). Self stressing concrete is concrete in which the induced compressive stresses are large enough to result in a significant compressive stress
after drying shrinkage has occurred (about 1 to 3.5 MPa (150 to 500 psi)). It is clear that is both these definitions involve a restraint of the expansion, usually in the form of reinforcement, preferably triaxial. Indeed, it is not expansion that is of interest but an induced compressive stress which can compensate for tensile stresses that w
ould otherwise manifest themselves as tensile strains and possibly as cracks. A Standard laying down the practice for the use of shrinkage-compensating concrete was issued by the American Concrete Institute in 1977. It may be noted that many properties of this concrete, such as strength, modulus of elasticity, inherent shrinkage, and resistan
ce to freezing and thawing, are similar to those of corresponding Portland cement concretes, but the loss of slump is faster. The resistance to sulphate attack may be impaired, especially with types M and S. The performance of these concretes on a limited scale has been found to be encouraging and there is a good prospect of prestressing concr
ete by the use of expanding cement. Nevertheless, further improvements in the cements are necessary before they can be more widely employed. High-alumina Cement The search for a solution to the problem of attack of gypsum-bearing waters on Portland cement concrete structures in France led Jules Bied to the development of a high-alumina
cement, at the beginning of this century. This cement is very different in its composition and also in some properties from Portland cements so that its structural use is severely limited, but the concreting techniques are similar. For full treatment of the topic, the reader may consult a specialized book. Manufacture From the name of th
e cement - high-alumina or aluminous - it can be inferred that it contains a large proportion of alumina: the cement consists, in fact, of approximately equal parts, about 40 per cent each, of alumina and lime, with some ferrous and ferric oxides, and up to about 8 per cent of silica. The raw materials are limestone or chalk, and bauxite. Bau
xite is a residual deposit formed by the weathering under tropical conditions of rocks containing aluminium, and consists of hydrated alumina, oxides of iron and titanium, with small amounts of silica. There are no bauxite deposits in Great Britain and it is imported from Greece and France. In the British process of manufacture of aluminous
cement, bauxite is crushed into lumps not larger than 100 mm (or 4 in.). Dust and small particles formed during this fermentation are cemented into briquettes of similar size as dust would tend to damp the furnace. the second main raw material is usually limestone, also crushed to lumps of about 100 mm (or 4 in.). Limestone and bauxite in th
e required proportions are fed into the top of a furnace which is a combination of the cupola (vertical stack) and reverberatory (horizontal) types. Pulverized coal is used for firing, its quantity being about 22 per cent of the weight of the cement produced. In the furnace, the moisture and carbon dioxide are driven off and the materials are
heated by the furnace gases to the point of fusion at about 1600 C. The fusion takes place at the lower end of the stack so that the molten material falls into the reverberatory furnace and thence through a spout into steel pans. The melt is now solidified into pigs, fragmented in a rotary cooler, and then ground in a tube mill. A very dark gr
ey powder with a fineness of 250 to 320 m2 / kg is produced. Because of the high hardness of high-alumina cement clinker, the power consumption and the wear of tube mills are considerable. This, coupled with the high prime cost of bauxite and the high temperature of firing, leads to a high price of high-alumina cement, compared with, say, rap
id hardening Portland cement. The price is, however, compensated for by some valuable properties for specific purposes. It may be noted that, unlike the case of Portland cement, the materials used in the manufacture of high-alumina cement are completely fused in the kiln. This fact gave rise to the French name Ciment Fondu, which is now used
in Britain as a trade name. Because trade names are so widely used the other names should also be mentioned: Lightning cement (in Britain) and Lumnite (in the United States). Composition Table 2.6 gives typical values of oxide composition of high-alumina cement. A minimum alumina content of 32 per cent is prescribed by BS 915: 1972, which
requires also the alumina / lime ratio to be between 0.85 and 1.3. Table 2.6: Typical Oxide Composition of High-alumina Cement Considerably less is known about the compound composition of high-alumina cement than of Portland cement, and simple method of calculation is available. The main cementitious compounds are calcium aluminates of
low basicity: CA and C5A3. The latter is now believed to be really C12A7. Other phases are also present: C6A4.FeO.S and an isomorphous CgA4.MgO.S. C2S or C2AS does not account for more than a few per cent and there are, of course, minor compounds present but no free lime can exist. Thus unsoundness is never a problem in high-alumina cement alt
hough BS 915: 1972 prescribes the conventional Le Chatelier test. Hydration The hydration of CA, which has the highest rate of strength development, results in the formation of CAH10, a small quantity of C2AH8, and of alumina gel (Al2O3.aq). With time, these hexagonal CAH10 crystals, which are unstable both at normal and at higher tempera
tures, become transformed into cubic crystals of C3AH6 and alumina gel. This transformation is encouraged by a higher temperature and a higher concentration of lime or a rise in alkalinity. C5A3 is believed to hydrate to C2AH8. C2S forms CSHx, the lime liberated by hydrolysis reacting with excess alumina; no Ca(OH)2, exists. The reactions of
hydration of the other compounds, particularly those containing iron, have not been determined with any degree of certainty, but the iron held in glass is known to be inert. The water of hydration of high-alumina cement is calculated to be up to 50 per cent of the weight of the dry cement, which is about twice as much as the water required fo
r the hydration of Portland cement, but mixes with a water / cement ratio as low as 0.35 are practical and indeed desirable. Resistance to Chemical Attack As mentioned earlier, high-alumina cement was first developed to resist sulphate attack, and it is indeed highly satisfactory in this respect. This resistance to sulphates is due to th
e absence of Ca(OH)2 in hydrated high-alumina cement and also to the protective influence of the relatively inert alumina gel formed during hydration. However, lean mixes are very much less resistant to sulphates. Also, the chemical resistance decreases drastically after conversion (see p. 92). High-alumina cement is not attacked by CO2 disso
lved on pure water. The cement is not acid-resisting but it can withstand tolerably well very dilute solutions of acids (pH greater than 3.5 to 4 0) found in industrial effluents, but not of hydrochloric, hydrofluoric or nitric acids. On the other hand, caustic alkalis, even in dilute solutions, attack high-alumina cement with great vigour by
dissolving the alumina gel. The alkalis may have their origin outside (e.g. by percolation through Portland cement concrete) or in the aggregate. The behaviour of this cement in the presence of many agents has been studied by Hussey and Robson. It may be noted that, although high-alumina cement stands up extremely well to sea water, this wat
er should not be used as mixing water; the setting and hardening of the cement are adversely affected, possibly because of the formation of chloroaluminates. Likewise, calcium chloride must never be added to high-alumina cement. Physical Properties of High-alumina Cement Concrete Another outstanding feature of high-alumina cement is its
very high rate of strength development About 80 per cent of its ultimate strength is achieved at the age of 24 hours, and even at 6 to 8 hours the concrete is strong enough for the side formwork to be struck and for the preparation for further concreting to take place. The high rate of gain of strength is due to its rapid hydration, which in
turn means a high rate of heat development. This can be as high as 38 J per gram per hour (9 cal / g / h) whereas for rapid hardening Portland cement the rate is never higher than 15 J per gram per hour (3.5 cal / g /h). However, the total heat of hydration is of the same order for both types of cement. Concrete made with high-alumina cement
and high-alumina cement clinker as aggregate, with a water / cement ratio of 0.5, can reach a strength of about 100 MPa (14 000 psi) in 24 hours, and 120 MPa (18000 psi) in 28 days at cool temperatures. This extremely high strength development is due to the cementitious character of the aggregate but this aggregate is, of course, very expen
sive. It should be stressed that the rapidity of hardening is not accompanied by rapid setting. In fact, high-alumina cement is slow setting but the final set follows the initial set more rapidly than is the case in Portland cement. Typical values for high-alumina cement are: initial set - 4 to 5 hours, final set - 30 minutes later. BS 915
: 1972 requires the initial set to take place between two and six hours after mixing, and the final set not more than two hours after the initial set. Of the compounds present in the high-alumina cement, C5A3 sets in a few minutes while CA is considerably more slow-setting, so that the higher the C : A ratio in the cement the more rapid the se
t. On the other hand, the higher the glass content of the cement the slower the setting. It is likely that, because of its rapid setting properties, C5A3 is responsible for the loss of workability of many high-alumina cement concretes, which takes place within 15 or 20 minutes of mixing. The setting time of high-alumina cement is greatly aff
ected by the addition of plaster, lime, Portland cement and organic matter and for this reason no additives should be used. Fig. 2.7. Setting time of Portland - high-alumina cement mixtures In the case of Portland cement - high-alumina cement mixtures, when either cement constitutes between 20 and 80 per cent of the mixture, flash set ma
y occur. Typical data are shown in Fig. 2.7 but actual values vary for different cements, and trial tests should be made with any given cements. The accelerated setting is due to the formation of a hydrate of C4A by the addition of lime from the Portland cement to calcium aluminate from the high-alumina cement. Also, gypsum contained in the Po
rtland cement may react with hydrated calcium aluminates, and as a consequence the now non-retarded Portland cement may exhibit a flash set. Mixtures of the two cements in suitable proportions are used when rapid setting is of vital importance, e.g. for stopping the ingress of water, or for temporary construction between the tides, but the u
ltimate strength of such pastes is quite low. Because of the rapid setting just described, in normal concrete construction it is essential to make sure that the two cements do not come in contact with one another. Thus, placing concrete made with one type of cement against concrete made with the other must be delayed by at least 24 hours if h
igh-alumina cement was cast first, or 3 to 7 days if the earlier concrete was made with Portland cement. Contamination through plant or tools must also be avoided. It may be noted that, for equal mix proportions, high-alumina cement produces a somewhat more workable mix than when Portland cement is used. This may be due to the lower total sur
face area of high-alumina cement particles which have a "smoother" surface than Portland cement particles, since high-alumina cement is produced by complete fusion of the raw materials. Creep of high-alumina cement concrete has been found to differ little from the creep of Portland cement concretes when the two are compared on the basis of th
e stress / strength ratio. Conversion of High-alumina Cement The high strength of high-alumina cement concrete referred to on Page 90 (see also Fig. 2.8) is reached when the hydration of CA results in the formation of CAH10 with a small quantity of C2AH8 and of alumina gel (Al2O3.aq). The hydrate CAH10 is, however, chemically unstable bo
th at higher and normal temperatures and becomes transformed into C3AH6 and alumina gel. This change is known as conversion, and, since the symmetry of the crystal systems is pseudo-hexagonal for the decahydrate and cubic for the sesquihydrate, one can refer to it as the change from the hexagonal to cubic form. Fig. 2.8. Strength development
of concrete cylinders with different water / cement ratios made with high-alumina cement and cured at 18 C (64 F) and 95 per cent relative humidity An important feature of hydration of high-alumina cement is that at higher temperatures only the cubic form of the calcium aluminate hydrate can exist; at room temperature either can, but the h
exagonal crystals spontaneously, albeit slowly, convert to the cubic form. Because they undergo a spontaneous change, the hexagonal crystals can be said to be unstable at room temperature, the final product of the reactions of hydration being the cubic form. Application of heat speeds up the process. This then is conversion: an unavoidable cha
nge of one form of calcium aluminate hydrate to another, and it is only reasonable to add that this type of change is not an uncommon phenomenon in nature. Before discussing the significance of conversion we should briefly describe the reaction. Conversion both of CAH10 and of C2AH8 proceeds direct; for instance: (reaction). It should
be noted that, although water appears as a product of the reaction, conversion can take place only in the presence of water and not in desiccated concrete because redissolving and reprecipitation are involved. As far as neat cement paste is concerned, it has been found that, in sections thicker than 25 mm, the interior of the hydrating cement
has an equivalent relative humidity of 100 per cent regardless of the environmental humidity, so that conversion can take place. The influence of the ambient humidity is thus only on concrete near the surface. The cubic product of conversion, C3AH6 is stable in a solution of calcium hydroxide at 25 C but reacts with a mixed Ca(OH)2-CaSO4 solu
tion to form 3CaO.Al2O3.3CaSO4.31H2O both at 25 C and at higher temperatures. The degree of conversion is estimated from the percentage of C3AH6 present as a proportion of the sum of the cubic and hexagonal hydrates together, i.e. (formula). The relative weights of the compounds are derived from the measurements of endothermic peaks in
a differential-thermal-analysis thermogram. However, unless the determination can be made under CO2-free conditions, there is a risk of decomposition of C3AH6 into AH3. The degree of conversion can be determined also in terms of the latter compound because, fortuitously, the weights of C3AH6 and AH3 produced in conversion are not very differe
nt. Thus we can write: (formula). While the two expressions do not give exactly the same result, at high degrees of conversion the difference is not significant. Most laboratories report the result to the nearest 5 per cent. Concrete which has converted about 85 per cent would be considered as fully converted. The rate of conversion dep
ends on temperature; some actual data are shown in Table 2.7. The relation between the time necessary for one-half of the CAH10 to convert and the temperature of storage of 13 mm (1/2 in.) cubes of neat cement paste with a water / cement ratio of 0.26 is shown in Fig. 2.9. It is likely that, for the more porous concretes of practical mix propo
rtions, the periods are much shorter as full conversion has been observed after some twenty years at 20 C or thereabouts Thus data on neat cement pastes with very low water / cement ratios should be used circumspectly, but they are nevertheless of scientific interest. Table 2.7: Development of Conversion with Age Fig. 2.9. Time for half-c
onversion of neat high-alumina cement pastes cured at various temperatures (13 mm (1/2 in.) cubes) In the past, the main concern with control of conversion lay in preventing a temperature rise of concrete due to the rapid development of the heat of hydration. For this reason, cooling of freshly-placed concrete was insisted upon. Later, atte
mpts were made to show that conversion occurs only under certain conditions and that its effects could under many circumstances be avoided. We can now state with reasonable certainty that under practical conditions obtaining in temperate climates, and of course at higher temperatures, conversion inevitably occurs. The rate of conversion is ac
celerated by a higher temperature Even short periods of higher temperature increase conversion and their effect is cumulative. It follows that buildings where higher temperatures obtain only at times are also affected. The speed of conversion within a given building may vary, being highest near sources of heat, especially with underfloor heati
ng. The practical interest in conversion lies in the fact that it leads to a loss of strength of high-alumina cement concrete. The most likely explanation why this is so is in terms of the densification of the calcium aluminate hydrates: typically, the density would be 172 g / ml for CAH10 and 2.53 for C3AH6. Thus, under conditions such that
the overall dimensions of the body are constant (as is the case in set cement paste), conversion results in an increase in the porosity of the paste. Numerous proofs of this are available, a recent and particularly convincing one being the measurement of air permeability of converted compared with unconverted high-alumina cement concrete. (
see Fig. 2.10). Fig. 2.10. Airflow through concrete: (a) unconverted high-alumina cement concrete; (b) converted high-alumina cement concrete; (c) Portland cement concrete (temperature 22 to 24 C (72 to 75 F), relative humidity 36 to 41 per cent; pressure difference 10.7 kPa) As shown on page 271, the strength of hydrated cement paste or
of concrete is very strongly affected by its porosity; porosity of 5 per cent can reduce the strength by more than 30 per cent, and a 50 per cent reduction in strength would be caused by a porosity of the order of 8 per cent. This order of magnitude of porosity can be induced by conversion in high-alumina cement concrete. It follows that, si
nce conversion takes place in concretes and mortars of any mix proportions, they lose strength when exposed to a higher temperature, and the general pattern of the strength loss versus time curves is similar in all cases. However, the degree of loss is a function of the water / cement ratio of the mix, as shown in Fig. 2.11. The mix proportion
s and percentage loss are given in Table 2.8. It is clear that the loss, either in megapascals or as a fraction of the strength of cold-cured concrete, is smaller in mixes with low water / cement ratios than in mixes with high water / cement ratios. Fig. 2.11. Influence of the water / cement ratio on the strength of high-alumina cement concre
te cubes curved in water at 18 C and 40 C for 100 days Table 2.8: Influence of Water / Cement Ratio on Loss of Strength on Conversion. It may be observed that the shape of the strength versus water / cement ratio curves for storage at 18 C (Fig. 2.11) is dissimilar from the usual curves for Portland cement concretes. This is characteristic
of concretes made with high-alumina cement, and has been confirmed also for cylinders both of standard size and other height / diameter ratios. The values shown in Fig. 2.11 are no more than typical, and clearly some variation would be found with different cements, but the pattern of behaviour is the same in all cases. It is important to no
te that the residual strength of mixes with moderate and high water / cement ratios, say over 0.5, may be so low as to be unacceptable for most structural purposes. The relative difference in the loss of strength of high-alumina cement concrete made with a high water / cement ratio and with a low water / cement ratio should be noted. In the
latter case, say at a water / cement ratio of 0.35, even after full conversion the strength could be deemed to be adequate for all structural purposes. Two caveats should, however, be expressed. First, under practical conditions of manufacture of concrete, it is not possible to guarantee that the water / cement ratio will not be occasionally e
xceeded by 0.05 or even by 0.10; this has been repeatedly demonstrated. Second, converted high-alumina cement concrete, even if of adequate strength, is more porous and therefore more liable to chemical attack than before conversion. Not only the water / cement ratio but also the richness of the mix may affect the loss of strength on conversi
on. For a given water / cement ratio, the leaner the mix the lower the porosity of the cement paste and, consequently, the lower the relative loss in strength with time. The important point is that, despite some attempts to prove the contrary, all mixes lose strength on conversion. Test results on the strength of 13 mm (1/2 in.) cubes of neat
high-alumina cement paste show that even at a water / cement ratio of 0.30, the strength at 50 C (122 F) is only 34 per cent of the strength at 18 C (64 F); at a water / cement ratio of 0.50, the fraction is only 20 per cent. These values are much lower than those often quoted for concrete but it must be stressed that the data refer to neat c
ement pastes. The value of the minimum strength after conversion was also controversial, but there are now available long-term data which give a clear and broad picture of the residual strength which can be expected. Actual values may vary with the particular cement used, but the following can be used as typical values: (table). The lo
ss of strength is often accompanied by a change in the colour of the cement paste from blackish-grey to brown or yellow-brown. This happens probably because the increase in porosity on conversion facilitates the oxidation of the ferrous compounds in the cement paste. This is why conversion and change in colour may occur together, but concrete
which is porous due to bad mix proportions can also change colour in the absence of conversion. In view of the effects of conversion, high-alumina cement is no longer used in structural concrete above or below ground, but it is a valuable material for repair work of limited life and in temporary works. Refractory Properties of High-alumi
na Cement High-alumina cement concrete is one of the foremost refractory materials but it is important to be clear about its performance over the full temperature range. Between room temperature and about 500 C, high-alumina cement concrete loses strength to a greater extent than Portland cement concrete, then up to 800 C the two are compara
ble, but above about 1000 C high-alumina cement gives excellent performance. Fig. 2.12 shows the behaviour of high-alumina cement concrete made with four different aggregates over a temperature range up to 1100 C. The minimum strength varies between 5 and 26 per cent of the original value but, depending on the type of aggregate, above 700 to
1000 C, there is a gain in strength due to the development of a ceramic bond. This bond is established by solid reactions between the cement and fine aggregate, and increases with an increase in temperature and with the progress of the reactions. Fig. 2.12. Strength of high-alumina cement concretes made with different aggregates as a func
tion of temperature. As a result, high-alumina cement concrete can withstand very high temperatures: with crushed firebrick aggregate up to about 1350C , and with special aggregates, such as fused alumina or carborundum, up to 1600 C. A temperature as high as 1800 C can be withstood over prolonged periods of time by concrete made from spec
ial white calcium aluminate cement with fused alumina aggregate. This cement is made using alumina as raw material and contains 70 to 80 per cent of A12O3, 20 to 25 per cent lime, and only about 1 per cent of iron and silica; the composition of the cement approaches C3A5. It is appropriate to mention that the price of the cement is about $500
(f250) per tonne. Refractory concrete made with high-alumina cement has a good resistance to acid attack (e.g. acids in flue gases), the chemical resistance being in fact increased by firing at 900 to 1000 C. The concrete can be brought up to service temperature as soon as it has hardened, that is it does not have to be pre-fired. While refra
ctory brickwork expands on heating and therefore needs expansion joints, high-alumina cement concrete can be cast monolithically, or with butt joints only (at 1 m to 2 m), to exactly the required shape and size. The reason for this is that the loss of water on first firing results in a contraction approximately equal to the thermal expansion o
n heating, so that the nett dimensional change (depending on aggregate) is small. Upon subsequent cooling, for instance during the shut-down of plants, butt joints would open slightly due to the thermal contraction but they would close up again on re-heating. It is worth noting that refractory high-alumina cement concrete can withstand a consi
derable thermal shock. Refractory linings can be made by shotcreting high-alumina cement mortar. For insulating purposes, when temperatures up to about 950 C are expected, lightweight concrete can be made with high-alumina cement and lightweight aggregate. Such concrete has a density of 500 to 1000 kg / m3 (30 to 60 lb / ft3) and a thermal c
onductivity of 0.21 to 0.29 J / m2 s C / m (0.12 to 0.17 Btu / ft2 h F / ft). Admixtures Often, instead of using a special cement, it is possible to change some of the properties of the cement in hand by the use of a suitable additive. A great number of proprietary products is available: their effects are described by the manufacturers b
ut the full details of the action of many of these additives, known as admixtures, are yet to be determined, and the performance of any one admixture should be carefully checked before it is used. Admixtures may be classified according to the purpose for which they are used in concrete; the approach of ASTM Standard C 494-79 can be used. In
this chapter, we shall consider only one well-tried accelerating admixture (Type C, according to the ASTM classification) (calcium chloride), retarding admixtures or retarders.(Type B), water-reducing admixtures (Type A), and also the so-called superplasticizers. The nomenclature is somewhat confusing in that retardation refers to the setting
of concrete while acceleration primarily to the early strength development, i.e. to hardening (see p. 68), more rapid setting being generally only coincidental. The classification of the British Standard BS 5075 : Part 1 : 1974 is substantially similar; the standard lays down the requirements for the various types of admixtures (Table 2.9).
Table 2.9: Specification for the Various Types of Admixtures According to BS 5075: Part 1: 1974 Additives inducing air entrainment are considered on p. 475. There exist also additives for other purposes, such as air detrainment, fungicidal action, water-proofing, etc., but these are not sufficiently standardized. Here it suffices to say tha
t water-proofing admixtures (calcium stearate, butyl stearate, and calcium oleate) are supposed to repel water by an electrostatic charge which they form after reacting with calcium ions on the walls of the capillaries in the hydrated cement paste. It is doubtful whether the effect persists over long periods. For fungicidal purposes, copper su
lphate and pentachlorophenol have been suggested. These control the growth of algae or lichen on hardened concrete but again their effectiveness is lost with time. Clearly, admixtures which may prove toxic should not be used. Useful information about miscellaneous admixtures is given in a guide of the American Concrete Institute. The water-p
roofing admixtures should be distinguished from water repellents, based on silicone resins, which are applied to the concrete surface. Waterproof membranes are emulsion-based bitumen coatings, possibly with rubber latex, which produce a tough film with some degree of elasticity. Their use requires specialist advice. Pigments can also be consid
ered as an additive; they are mentioned on page 82. An important feature of the majority of admixtures for concrete is that they are used primarily on the basis of experience or ad hoc tests: theoretical information on a scientific basis is generally not available to permit a reliable quantitative prediction of behaviour in concrete under the
various possible circumstances. This is due to the marketing of admixtures largely as proprietary products. Acceptance requirements are laid down by ASTM Standard C 494-79 and by British Standard BS 5075 : Part 1 : 1974. Calcium Chloride The addition of calcium chloride to the mix increases the rate of development of strength, and this a
ccelerator is, therefore, sometimes used when concrete is to be placed at low temperatures (in the region of 2 to 40 C (35 to 40 F)) or when urgent repair work is to be done. Calcium chloride increases the rate of heat liberation during the first few hours after mixing, the action of CaCl2 being probably that of a catalyst in the reactions of
hydration of C3S and C2S; it is possible that the reduction in the alkalinity of the solution promotes the hydration of the silicates. The hydration of C3A is delayed somewhat, but the normal process of hydration of cement is not changed. Calcium chloride may be added to rapid hardening as well as to ordinary Portland cement, and the more r
apid the natural rate of hardening of the cement the earlier becomes apparent the action of the accelerator. Calcium chloride must not, however, be used with high-alumina cement. With rapid hardening Portland cement the increase in strength due to CaCl2 can be as much as 7 MPa (1000 psi) at 1 day while with ordinary Portland cement this increa
se would be achieved only after 3 to 7 days. By the age of 28 days there is no difference between the strengths of rapid hardening cements with and without CaCl2, but in the case of ordinary Portland cement the addition of CaCl2 would still show an improved strength. Hickey's results for cements of different types are shown in Fig. 2.13. The
long-term strength of concrete is believed to be unaffected by CaCl2. Calcium chloride is generally more effective in increasing the early strength of rich mixes with a low water / cement ratio than of lean ones. Fig. 2.13. Influence of CaCl, on the strength of concretes made with different types of cement (For Type V curve reference is 2.1
.) The quantity of CaCl2 added to the mix must be carefully controlled. To calculate the quantity required it can be assumed that the addition of 1 per cent of anhydrous CaCl2 (as a fraction of the weight of cement) affects the rate of hardening as much as a rise in temperature of 6 C (11 F). A calcium chloride content of 1 to 2 per cent is
generally sufficient; the latter figure should not be exceeded unless a test with the cement to be actually used in construction is made, as the effects of calcium chloride depend to a certain degree on the composition of the cement. This applies in particular to the setting time. Calcium chloride generally accelerates setting and an excess
of CaCl2 can cause a flash set. Typical figures showing the influence of CaCl2 on the setting time are given in Table 2.10. This acceleration of setting makes the addition of CaCl2 useful in repair work, for instance, when the ingress of water can be prevented for a short time only. Table 2.10: Influence of Calcium chloride on Setting Time
It is important that calcium chloride be uniformly distributed throughout the mix, and this is best achieved by dissolving the additive in the mixing water before it enters the mixer. It is convenient to prepare a concentrated aqueous solution of CaCl2, and this is more easily obtained using commercial calcium chloride flakes rather than gr
anular calcium chloride which dissolves very slowly. The flakes consist of CaCl2.2H2O so that 1.37g of flakes is equivalent to 1g of anhydrous calcium chloride. When different chlorides co-exist, calculation in terms of chloride ions is useful: 1.56g of CaCl2 corresponds to 1 g of chloride ion. In cases when the durability of concrete may be
impaired by outside agencies the use of calcium chloride may be inadvisable. For instance, the resistance of cement to sulphate attack is reduced by the addition of CaCl2, particularly in lean mixes, and the risk of an alkali - aggregate reaction, when the aggregate is reactive, is increased. However, when this reaction is effectively controll
ed by the use of low-alkali cement and the addition of pozzolanas, the effect of CaCl2 is very small. Another undesirable feature of the addition of CaCl2 is that it increases the drying shrinkage usually by about 10 to 15 per cent, sometimes even more, and possibly increases also the creep. Although the addition of CaCl2 reduces the danger o
f frost attack during the first few days after placing, the resistance of air-entrained concrete to freezing and thawing at later ages is adversely affected. Some indication of this is given in Fig. 2.14. Fig. 2.14. Resistance to freezing and thawing of concrete cured moist at 4 C (40 F) for different contents of CaCl2 On the credit side
, CaCl2 has been found to raise the resistance of concrete to erosion and abrasion, and this improvement persists at all ages. When plain concrete is steam cured, CaCl2 increases the strength of concrete and permits the use of a more rapid temperature rise during the curing cycle (see p. 327). The action of sodium chloride is similar to that
of calcium chloride but is of lower intensity. The effects of NaCl are also more variable and a depression in the heat of hydration, with a consequent loss of strength at 7 days and later has been observed. For this reason the use of NaCl is definitely undesirable. Barium chloride has been suggested but it acts as an accelerator only under war
m conditions. The possibility of corrosion of reinforcing steel by calcium chloride has for long been a subject of controversy. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation found no corrosion of reinforcement when calcium chloride is used in correct proportions, but others in the U.S. found that at high water / cement ratios some corrosion takes place, alt
hough the attack is not progressive. However, the chloride ions in concrete are often non-uniformly distributed and a number of cases of severe corrosion of reinforcement in structural members exposed to the weather have been reported even when the quantity of calcium chloride was apparently carefully controlled. The situation can be summari
zed as follows. Calcium chloride must not be used in concrete in contact with prestressing wires. Steam curing reinforced concrete with calcium chloride leads to a serious risk of severe corrosion. In the United Kingdom, since 1977, the use of calcium chloride in reinforced concrete or concrete containing embedded metal is not permitted by the
Code of Practice CP 110: 1972. The maximum chloride ion content (as a percentage of weight of cement) arising from all sources, including aggregate, is as follows: 0.1 for prestressed concrete, steam-cured reinforced concrete; 0.2 for any concrete made with sulphate-resisting or supersulphated cement; and 0.35 for all other concrete containin
g metal. The variability of the chloride ion content is recognized by allowing the value of 0.35 to rise to 0.50 in 5 per cent of test results. British Standard BS 5075: Part 1: 1974 prescribes a method of determining the chloride content of admixtures and there is no difficulty in establishing the chloride content of aggregate In the United S
tates, the American Concrete Institute proposes a revision of the Standard 201 to limit the total(i.e. from all sources) soluble chloride ion concentration as a percentage of weight of cement to 0.06 for prestressed concrete, and 0.10 to 0.15 for other concretes. Only concrete that will be permanently dry is exempt from this limitation. It may
be relevant to note that the use of calcium chloride in reinforced concrete was discontinued in Germany around 1974. In view of the above rules, it is necessary to determine the chloride content even of those admixtures in which calcium chloride is only a minor component. The limitations of the Code of Practice CP 110: 1972 may seem particu
larly severe, but calcium chloride does contribute to the risk of corrosion of reinforcement, and the risk can be avoided by the use of very rapid hardening cements or of chloride-free admixtures. Most of these are based on calcium formate, which, being slightly acidic, accelerates the process of hydration of cement. Sometimes, calcium formate
is blended with corrosion inhibitors such as soluble nitrites, benzoates and chromates. This type of admixture has a greater accelerating effect at low temperatures than at room temperature and is reported not to increase shrinkage to a significant extent. Calcium nitrite has also been suggested as an accelerator and so have several other com
pounds. Retarders A delay in the setting of the cement paste can be achieved by the addition to the mix of a retarding admixture. These admixtures generally slow down also the hardening of the paste although some salts may speed up the setting but inhibit the development of strength. Retarders do not alter composition or identity of produ
cts of hydration. Retarders are useful in concreting in hot weather, when the setting time is shortened by the higher temperature and in preventing formation of cold joints. The delay in hardening caused by the retarders can be used to obtain an architectural finish of exposed aggregate: the retarder is applied to the interior surface of the
formwork so that the hardening of the adjacent cement is delayed. This cement can be brushed off after formwork has been struck so that an exposed aggregate surface is obtained. Retarding action is exhibited by sugar, carbohydrate derivatives, soluble zinc salts, soluble borates, and others. In practice, retarders which are also water-reduc
ing are more commonly used; these are described in the next section. Great care is necessary in using retarders as in incorrect quantities they can totally inhibit the setting and hardening of concrete. Cases are known of seemingly inexplicable results of strength tests when sugar bags have been used for the shipment of aggregate samples to th
e laboratory or when molasses bags have been used to transport freshly mixed concrete. The effects of sugar depend greatly on the quantity used, and conflicting results were reported in the past. It seems now that, used in a carefully controlled manner, a small quantity of sugar (about 0.05 per cent of the weight of cement) will act as an acce
ptable retarder; the delay in setting of concrete is about 4 hours. However, the exact effects of sugar depend greatly on the chemical composition of cement. For this reason, the performance of sugar, and indeed of any retarder, should be determined by trial mixes with the actual cement which is to be used in construction. A large quantity
of sugar, say 0.2 to 1 per cent of the weight of cement, will virtually prevent the setting of cement. Such quantities of sugar can therefore be used as an inexpensive "kill", for instance when a mixer or an agitator has broken down and cannot be discharged. When sugar is used as a controlled set retarder, the early strength of concrete is s
everely reduced but beyond about 7 days there is an increase in strength of several per cent compared with a non-retarded mix. This is probably due to the fact that delayed setting produces a denser gel (cf. p. 318). It is interesting to note that the effectiveness of an admixture depends on the time when it is added to the mix: a delay of ev
en 2 minutes after water has come into contact with the cement increases the retardation; such a delay can be achieved by a suitable sequence of feeding the mixer. The increased retardation occurs especially with cements which have a high C3A content because, once some C3A has hydrated, it does not absorb the admixture so that more of it is le
ft to retard the hydration of the calcium silicates, which occurs through adsorption on to the calcium hydroxide nuclei. Retarders tend to increase the plastic shrinkage because the duration of the plastic stage is extended but drying shrinkage is not affected. The mechanism of action of retarders has not been established with certainty. We
know that they modify the crystal growth or morphology and this results in a more efficient barrier to further hydration than is the case without an admixture. The admixtures are finally removed from solution by being incorporated into the hydrated material but this does not necessarily mean the formation of different complex hydrates. This is
also the case with water-reducing and retarding admixtures (such as ligno-sulphonates): Khalil and Ward showed that the linear relation between the heat of hydration and weight of non-evaporable water (see Fig. 2.15) is unaffected by the addition of the admixture. Fig. 2.15. Relation between the non-evaporable water content of cement and h
eat of hydration Water-reducing Admixtures According to ASTM Standard C 494-79, admixtures which are water-reducing only are called Type A, but if the water-reducing properties are associated with set retardation, the admixture is classified as Type D. There exists also water-reducing and accelerating admixtures (Type E) but these are of
little interest. The two main groups of admixtures of Type D are - (a) Lignosulphonic acids and their salts (known as Class 1 in the ASTM nomenclature and (b) hydroxylated carboxylic acids and their salts (known as Class 3). The modifications and derivatives of these, known as Class 2 and 4 respectively, do not act as retarders, and may even
behave as accelerators (see Fig. 2.16): they are therefore of Type A or E (see p. 100). 2.16 Effect of various water-reducing admixtures on the setting time of concrete The principal active components of the admixtures are surface-active agents. These are substances which are concentrated at the interface between two immiscible phases a
nd which alter the physico-chemical forces acting at this interface. The substances are adsorbed on the cement particles, giving them a negative charge which leads to repulsion between the particles and results in stabilizing their dispersion; air bubbles are also repelled and cannot attach to the cement particles. In addition, the charge caus
es the development around each particle of a sheath of oriented molecules which prevent a close approach of the particles to one another. The particles have, therefore, a greater mobility, and water freed from the restraining influence of the flocculated system becomes available to lubricate the mix so that the workability is increased. One
effect of dispersion is to expose a greater surface area of cement to hydration, which progresses therefore at a higher rate in the early stages. For this reason, there is an increase in the strength of concrete, compared with a mix of the same water / cement ratio but without the admixture. A more uniform distribution of the dispersed cement
throughout the concrete may also contribute to the improved strength. The increase in strength is particularly noticeable in very young concretes but under certain conditions persists for a long time. The influence of admixtures on strength varies considerably with the composition of cement, the greatest increase in strength occurring when us
ed with cements of low alkali or low C3A content. With some cements, the influence of admixtures is very small, but in general terms admixtures are effective with all types of Portland cement and also with high-alumina cement. Some water-reducing admixtures are more effective when used in mixes containing pozzolanas than in plain mixes. The
reduction in the quantity of mixing water that is possible owing to the use of admixtures varies between 5 and 15 per cent (Table 2.11). A part of this is in many cases (especially with Class 1 admixtures) due to the entrained air introduced by the admixture. The actual decrease in the mixing water depends on the cement content, type of aggreg
ate used, presence of air-entraining agents or pozzolanas. It is therefore apparent that trial mixes, containing the actual materials to be used on the job, are essential in order to determine the type and quantity of admixture to achieve optimum properties. Data given by the manufacturers of admixtures cannot generally be unquestionably accept
ed. It should also be noted that even though set is retarded, admixtures do not always reduce the rate of loss of workability with time. A further aspect to be considered is the danger of segregation of the concrete; this can be investigated by measurement of bleeding. Table 2.11: Water Reduction Obtained with Different Water-reducing and S
et-retarding Admixtures The quantity of admixture represents generally only a fraction of one per cent of the weight of cement in the mix so that use of reliable dispensing equipment is essential. Superplasticizers (High-range Water-reducers) These are a modern type of water-reducing admixture, much more effective than the admixtures d
iscussed in the preceding section. Chemically, they are sulphonated melamine formaldehyde condensates and sulphonated napthalene formaldehyde condensates, the latter being probably the somewhat more effective of the two in dispersing the cement and generally having also some retarding properties. At a given water / cement ratio, this dispersin
g action increases the workability of concrete, typically by raising the slump from 75 mm (3 in.) to 200 mm (8 in.), the mix remaining cohesive (see Fig. 2.17). (The improvement in workability is smaller at high temperatures.) The resulting concrete can be placed with little or no compaction and is not subject to excessive bleeding or segregat
ion. Such concrete is termed flowing concrete and is useful for placing in very heavily reinforced sections, in inaccessible areas, in floor or road slabs and also where very rapid placing is desired. Some comments on mix design of flowing concrete are made on page 709. It should be remembered when designing formwork that flowing concrete can
exert full hydrostatic pressure. Fig. 2.17. Relation between German flow table spread and water content of concrete with and without superplasticizer The second use of superplasticizers is in the production of concrete of normal workability but with an extremely high strength owing to a very substantial reduction in the water / cement ra
tio. Water / cement ratios down to 0.28 have been used with 28-day strengths of the order of 100 MPa (15 000 psi). The long-term strength is unimpaired, test results being available up to 13 years. Generally speaking, superplasticizers can reduce the water content for a given workability by 25 to 35 per cent (compared with half that value in t
he case of conventional water-reducing admixtures), and increase the 24-hour strength by 50 to 75 per cent and even greater increase occurs at earlier ages. Practical mixes with a strength of 30 MPa (4300 psi) at 7 hours have been obtained (see Fig. 2.18). With steam-curing or high-pressure steam-curing, even higher strengths are possible.
Fig. 2.18. The influence of the addition of superplasticizer on the early strength of concrete made with a cement content of 370 kg / m3 (630 lb / yd3) and cast at room temperature. Type III cement; all concretes of the same workability When the strength at later ages is of primary importance, superplasticizers can be used in concrete with
partial fly ash replacement of cement. The plasticizing action of superplasticizers is of short duration (perhaps 10 minutes): after some 30 to 90 minutes the workability returns to normal. For this reason, the superplasticizer should be added to the mix immediately prior to placing; usually, conventional mixing is followed by the addition of
the superplasticizer and a short period of additional mixing. In the case of ready-mixed concrete, a 2-minute re-mixing period is essential. While re-tempering with an additional dose is not recommended because of the risk of segregation; re-dosing to maintain workability up to 160 minutes has been used. Superplasticizers can be used at high
dosages. They do not markedly change the surface tension of water, their action being the dispersion of cement agglomerates normally found when cement is suspended in water. These admixtures are thought to be adsorbed on the surface of cement and of other very fine particles, causing them to become mutually repulsive as a result of the anionic
nature of superplasticizers, which causes the cement particles to become negatively charged. Superplasticizers do not significantly affect the setting of concrete except that, when used with cements having a very low C3A content, there may be excessive retardation. They do not influence shrinkage, creep, modulus of elasticity or resistance t
o freezing and thawing. Durability on exposure to sulphates is unaffected. The use of superplasticizers with an air-entraining admixture requires caution as sometimes the actual amount of entrained air is reduced by the superplasticizer. Specially modified superplasticizers have been developed and these seem to produce satisfactory air-entrai
ned concrete with conventional air-entraining agents. The only real disadvantage of superplasticizers is their relatively high cost, which is between $2 and $6 (fl and f3) per cubic metre of concrete. This is due to the high manufacturing cost of a product with a high molecular weight. 12 Constituent Materials Concrete is composed main
ly of three materials, namely, cement, water and aggregate, and an additional material, known as an admixture, is sometimes added to modify certain of its properties. Cement is the chemically active constituent but its reactivity is only brought into effect on mixing with water. The aggregate plays no part in chemical reactions but its usefuln
ess arises because it is an economical filler material with good resistance to volume changes which take place within the concrete after mixing, and it improves the durability of the concrete. A typical structure of hardened concrete and the proportions of the constituent materials encountered in most concrete mixes are shown in figure 12.1.
In a properly proportioned and compacted concrete the voids are usually less than 2 per cent. The properties of concrete in its fresh and hardened state can show large variations depending on the type, quality and proportions of the constituents, and from the discussion to follow students should endeavour to appreciate the significance of thos
e properties of the constituent materials which affect concrete behaviour. Figure 12.1 Composition of concrete 12.1 Cement The different cements used for making concrete are finely ground powders and all have the important property that when mixed with water a chemical reaction (hydration) takes place which, in time, produces a very
hard and strong binding medium for the aggregate particles. In the early stages of hydration, while in its plastic stage, cement mortar gives to the fresh concrete its cohesive properties. The different types of cement and the related British Standards, in which certain physical and chemical requirements are specified, are given in figure 12.
2; methods of testing cement for various properties are described in BS 4550. Of these, ordinary Portland cement is the most widely used, the others being used where concretes with special properties are required. Figure 12.2 Different types of cement used for making concrete Portland Cement Portland cement was developed in 1824 and
derives its name from Portland limestone in Dorset because of its close resemblance to this rock after hydration has taken place. The basic raw materials used in the manufacture of Portland cements are calcium carbonate, found in calcareous rocks such as limestone or chalk, and silica, alumina and iron oxide found in argillaceous rocks such as
clay or shale. Marl, which is a mixture of calcareous and argillaceous materials, can also be used. Manufacture Cement is prepared by first intimately grinding and mixing the raw constituents in certain proportions, burning this mixture at a very high temperature to produce clinker, and then grinding it into powder form. Since the clinke
r is formed by diffusion between the solid particles, intimate mixing of the ingredients is essential if a uniform cement is to be produced. This mixing may be in a dry or wet state depending on the hardness of the available rock. The wet process is used, in general, for the softer materials such as chalk or clay. Water is added to the propo
rtioned mixture of crushed chalk and clay to produce a slurry which is eventually led off to a kiln. This is a steel cylinder, with a refractory lining, which is slightly inclined to the horizontal and rotates continuously about its own axis. It is usually fired by pulverised coal, although gas or oil may also be used. It may be as large as 3.
5 m in diameter and 150 m long and handle up to 700 t of cement in a day. The slurry is fed in at the upper end of the kiln and the clinker is discharged at the lower end where fuel is injected. With its temperature increasing progressively, the slurry undergoes a number of changes as it travels down the kiln. At 100 C the water is driven off,
at about 850 C carbon dioxide is given off and at about 1400 C incipient fusion takes place in the firing zone where calcium silicates and calcium aluminates are formed in the resulting clinker. The clinker is allowed to cool and then ground, with 1 to 5 per cent gypsum, to the required fineness. Different types of Portland cement are obtained
by varying the proportions of the raw materials, the temperature of burning and the fineness of grinding, and in some cases by intergrinding the clinker with other recognised materials such as pulverized-fuel ash (pfa), or granulated blastfurnace slag (gbfs). Gypsum is added to control the setting of the cement, which would otherwise set muc
h too quickly for general use. Certain additives may also be introduced for producing special cements, for example, calcium chloride is added in the manufacture of extra-rapid-hardening cement. The dry or semi-dry process is used for the harder rocks such as limestone and shale. The constituent materials are crushed into powder form and, with
a minimum amount of water, passed into an inclined rotating nodulising pan where nodules are formed. These are known as raw meal. This is fed into a kiln and thereafter the manufacturing process is similar to the wet process although a much shorter length of kiln is used. It should be noted that the dry and semi-dry processes are more energy
efficient than the wet process. The grinding of the clinker produces a cement powder which is still hot and this hot cement is usually allowed to cool before it leaves the cement works. Basic Characteristics of Portland Cements Differences in the behaviour of the various Portland cements are determined by their chemical composition an
d fineness. The effect of these on the physical properties of cement mortars and concrete are considered here. Chemical composition As a result of the chemical changes which take place within the kiln several compounds are formed in the resulting cement although only four (see table 12.1) are generally considered to be important. A direct
determination of the actual proportion of these principal compounds is a very tedious process and it is more usual to calculate these from the proportions of their oxide constituents, which can be determined more easily. A typical calculation using Bogue's method is shown in table 12.2. The limitations on chemical composition specified in Brit
ish Standards for the various main Portland cements are summarised in table 12.3 with lime saturation factor (LSF) defined as (formula) in which each oxide constituent in brackets is expressed as a percentage by weight of the cement. TABLE 12.1 Main chemical compounds of Portland cements TABLE 12.2 A typical chemical composition of or
dinary Portland cement TABLE 12.3 British Standard requirements for the chemical composition of the principal Portland cements The two silicates, C3S and C2S, which are the most stable of these compounds, together form 70 to 80 per cent of the constituents in the cement and contribute most to the physical properties of concrete. When cem
ent comes into contact with water, C3S begins to hydrate rapidly, generating a considerable amount of heat and making a significant contribution to the development of the early strength, particularly during the first 14 days. In contrast C2S, which hydrates slowly and is mainly responsible for the development in strength after about 7 days, may
be active for a considerable period of time. It is generally believed that cements rich in C2S result in greater resistance to chemical attack and a smaller drying shrinkage than do other Portland cements. It may be noted from table 12.2 that the C3S and C2S contents are interdependent. The hydration of C3A is extremely exothermic and takes
place very quickly, producing little increase in strength after about 24 hours. Of the four principal compounds tricalcium aluminate, C3A, is the least stable and cements containing more than 10 per cent of this compound produce concretes which are particularly susceptible to sulphate attack. Tetracalcium aluminoferrite, C4AF, is of less impor
tance than the other three compounds when considering the properties of hardened cement mortars or concrete. From the foregoing, certain conclusions may be drawn concerning the nature of various cements. The increased rate of strength development of rapid-hardening Portland cement arises from its generally high C3S content and also from its i
ncreased fineness which, by increasing the specific surface of the cement, increases the rate at which hydration can occur. The low rate of strength development of low-heat Portland cement is due to its relatively high C2S content and low C3A and C3S contents. An exceptionally low C3A content contributes to the increased resistance to sulphate
attack of sulphate-resisting cement. It should be noted that while there can be large differences in the early strength of concretes made with different Portland cements, their final strengths will generally be very much the same (see chapter 14). Fineness The reaction between the water and cement starts on the surface of the cement parti
cles and in consequence the greater the surface area of a given volume of cement the greater the hydration. It follows that for a given composition, a fine cement will develop strength and generate heat more quickly than a coarse cement. It will, of course, also cost more to manufacture as the clinker must be more finely ground. Fine cements,
in general, improve the cohesiveness of fresh concrete and can be effective in reducing the risk of bleeding (see chapter 13), but they increase the tendency for shrinkage cracking. Several methods are available for measuring the fineness of cement, for example BS 4550: Part 3 prescribes a permeability method which is a measure of the resista
nce of a layer of cement to the passage of air. The measured fineness is an over-all value known as specific surface and is expressed in square metres per kilogram (m2 kg-1 ). The minimum fineness requirement for Portland cements specified in British Standards ranges from 225 m2 kg-1 for ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to 325 m2 kg-1 for rapid-
hardening Portland cement (RHPC). However, cements manufactured in the United Kingdom are generally much finer than this, typical values for OPC and RHPC being around 325 and 385 m2 kg-1 respectively. Hydration The chemical combination of` cement and water, known as hydration, produces a very hard and strong binding medium for the aggrega
te particles in concrete and is accompanied by the liberation of heat, normally expressed as joules per gram. The rate of hydration depends on the relative properties of` silicate and aluminate compounds, the cement fineness and the ambient conditions (particularly temperature and moisture). The time taken by the main constituents of cement to
attain 80 per cent hydration is given in table 12.4 . Factors affecting the rate of hydration have a similar effect on the liberation of heat. It can be seen from table 12.5 that the heat associated with the hydration of each of the principal compounds of cement is very different and in consequence cements having different compositions also ha
ve different heat characteristics (see figure 12.3). TABLE 12.4 Time taken to achieve 80 per cent hydration of the main compounds of Portland cement, based on Goetz (1969) TABLE 12.5 Heat of hydration of the main chemical compounds of Portland cement, based on Goetz ( 1969) Figure 12.3 Typical results for the heat evolution at 20 C of
different Portland cements: (A) low heat, (B) ordinary and (C) rapid hardening, based on Lea (1970) Concrete is a poor conductor of heat and the heat generated during hydration can have undesirable effects on the properties of the hardened concrete as a result of microcracking of the binding medium. The possible advantages associated with t
he increased rate of hydration may in these circumstances be outweighed by the loss in durability of the concrete resulting from the microcracking. Other factors which affect the temperature of the concrete are the size of the structure, the ambient conditions, the type of formwork and the rate at which concrete is placed. It should be noted t
hat it is the rate at which heat is generated and not the total liberated heat which in practice affects the rise in temperature. The heat characteristics must be considered when determining the suitability of a cement for a given job. Setting and hardening Setting and hardening of the cement paste are the main physical characteristics ass
ociated with hydration of the cement. Hydration results in the formation of a gel around each of the cement particles and in time these layers of gel grow to the extent that they come into contact with each other. At this stage the cement paste begins to lose its fluidity. The beginning of a noticeable stiffening in the cement paste is known a
s the initial set. Further stiffening occurs as the volume of gel increases and the stage at which this is complete and the final hardening process, responsible for its strength, commences is known as the final set. The time from the addition of the water to the initial and final set are known as the setting times (BS 4550: Part 3) and the spec
ific requirements in this respect for cements are given in the appropriate British Standards. The setting times for some of the more important Portland cements are given in table 12.6. In practice, when mixes have a higher water content than that used in the standard tests, the cement paste takes a correspondingly longer time to set. Setting t
ime is affected by cement composition and fineness, and also, through its influence on the rate of hydration, by the ambient temperature. TABLE 12.6 Typical initial and final setting times for the main Portland cements Two further phenomena are a flash set and a false set. The former takes place in cement with insufficient gypsum to contr
ol the rapid reaction of C3A with water, this reaction generating a considerable amount of heat and causing the cement to stiffen within a few minutes after mixing. This can only be overcome by adding more water and reagitating the mix. The addition of water results in a reduction in strength. A false set also produces a rapid stiffening of the
paste but is not accompanied by excessive heat. In this case remixing the paste without further addition of water causes it to regain its plasticity and its subsequent setting and hardening characteristics are quite normal. False set is thought to be the result of intergrinding gypsum with very hot clinker in the initial stages of the manufac
ture of cement. Strength The strength of hardened cement is generally its most important property. The British Standard strength requirements for Portland cements, obtained from mortar or concrete tests carried out in accordance with BS 4550: Part 3, are summarised in table 12.7. It should be understood that cement paste alone is not used
for this test because of the unacceptably large variations of strength thus obtained. Standard aggregates are used for making prescribed mortar or concrete test mixes to eliminate aggregate effects from the measured strength of the cement. TABLE 12.7 British Standard requirements for strength of the principal Portland cements Soundness
An excessive change in volume, particularly expansions of a cement paste after setting indicates that the cement is unsound and not suitable for the manufacture of concrete. In general, the effects of` using unsound cement may not be apparent for some considerable period of` time but usually manifest themselves in cracking and disintegration o
f` the surface of` the concrete. One of` the methods for testing the soundness of cements is that developed by Le Chatelier as described in BS 4550: Part 3. The British Standard limitations specified for various Portland cements require that the measured expansion in this test be not more than 10 mm. Types of Cement The different type
s of cement are shown in figure 12.2 and their main properties are summarised in table 12.8. A brief description of typical properties of each type of cement is given here. For more detailed information the reader is referred to Neville (1986), Orchard (1979) and Harrison and Spooner (1986). TABLE 12.8 Main properties of different cements
Portland cements Ordinary Portland cement has a medium rate of hardening, making it suitable for most concrete work. It has, however, a low resistance to chemical attacks. Rapid-hardening Portland cement is in many ways similar to ordinary Portland cement but produces a much higher early strength. The increased rate of hydration is accompa
nied by a high rate of heat development which makes it unsuitable for large masses of concrete, although this may be used to advantage in cold weather. Low-heat Portland cement has a limited use but is suitable for very large structures, such as concrete dams, where the use of ordinary cement would result in unacceptably large temperature gradi
ents within the concrete. Its slow rate of hydration is accompanied by a much slower rate of increase in strength than for ordinary Portland cement although its final strength is very similar. Its resistance to chemical attack is greater than that of ordinary Portland cements. Sulphate-resisting Portland cement, except for its high resistance
to sulphate attack, has principal properties similar to those of ordinary Portland cement. Calcium chloride should not be used with this cement as it reduces its resistance to sulphate attack. Extra-rapid-hardening Portland cement is used when very high early strength is required or for concreting in cold conditions. Because of its rapid settin
g and hardening properties the concrete should be placed and compacted within about 30 minutes of mixing. Since the cement contains approximately 2 per cent calcium chloride dry storage is essential. Its use in reinforced or prestressed concrete is not recommended (BS 8110: Part 1). Ultra-high early-strength Portland cement, apart from its much