Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider using plaster for config files instead of pastedeploy #15

Open
mmerickel opened this issue May 11, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

consider using plaster for config files instead of pastedeploy #15

mmerickel opened this issue May 11, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@mmerickel
Copy link

Related to #14, we've written a new library called plaster for abstracting the config format away from Pyramid so that people can write their own custom formats. This can be updated in a bw-compatible way by depending on plaster_pastedeploy. Plaster can also be used for other purposes like sharing a config file with your message queue that is written as a gearbox subcommand or standalone.

http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/plaster/en/latest/

Again, I just wanted to bring it to your attention and am interested in your thoughts on using it.

@amol-
Copy link
Member

amol- commented Jun 6, 2017

Looks like plaster might solve some of the long standing problems of PasteDeploy and keep being compatible, thanks for pointing it out.

I'm willing to move gearbox to Plaster even though it might take some time before I'm able to, there is a bunch of other already started things that I need to complete before switching to this one. If anyone is willing to contribute a first port meanwhile it might be a good starting point we can refine with time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants