Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace Gatekeeper #2

Open
Swader opened this issue Mar 13, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Replace Gatekeeper #2

Swader opened this issue Mar 13, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Swader
Labels
bug enhancement
Milestone
3.0

Comments

@Swader
Copy link
Owner

Swader commented Mar 13, 2016

Due to some critical issues that render Gatekeeper completely insufficient for any kind of production use, namely this, this, this, this and more, and due to the complete unresponsiveness by project maintainer, I now consider Gatekeeper vaporware and am looking for alternatives.

Currently, the most likely course of action is grabbing what works from GK, putting it into a new package, and developing the rest of it properly around some interfaces. This breaking away from GK is planned for version 3.0.
@Swader Swader added this to the 3.0 milestone Mar 13, 2016
@Swader Swader self-assigned this Mar 13, 2016
@Swader
Copy link
Owner Author

Swader commented Mar 30, 2016

Another newly found critical fail of Gatekeeper is the default length of fields in the database. One of the more ridiculous ones is usernames being restricted to 20 characters. I tried to address this here, but I'm just about ready to officially declare Gatekeeper as abandonware. An alternative needs to be found / made ASAP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Swader Swader

Labels
bug enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Swader