Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: Set negation is an expensive operation #51

Open
djpiper28 opened this issue Dec 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Bug]: Set negation is an expensive operation #51

djpiper28 opened this issue Dec 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@djpiper28
Copy link
Collaborator

djpiper28 commented Dec 29, 2024

Add a consumer for negation of

  • types
  • format legalities
  • sets

The optimisation is to calculate as much of the tree as possible then apply these filters to the remaining cards. This prevents an entire database scan (which is the default negation behavior).

@djpiper28 djpiper28 added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant