Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Router False Positives #817

Open
2 of 3 tasks
0xvanbeethoven opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 of 3 tasks

Router False Positives #817

0xvanbeethoven opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
mev-false-positive Transactions that Brontes incorrectly classified as Mev S-needs-triage This issue needs to be labelled

Comments

@0xvanbeethoven
Copy link
Contributor

Type of MEV

atomic-arbitrage

Etherscan Links to Transactions

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0fc42e1d7fc05c2ad9854c29bf0a338e2540d64fa09330f6870c9378c90a2899

Protocols Interacted With in the Bundle

  • 1 inch
  • Dodo

Were all protocols correctly supported?

  • Yes, all protocols were correctly supported.
  • No, there were issues with protocol support.

Details of Misclassification

  • Falsely classified as atomic arbitrage

Expected Correct Classification (Optional)

  • Not an arbitrage

Additional Context (Optional)

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow the Code of Conduct.
@0xvanbeethoven 0xvanbeethoven added S-needs-triage This issue needs to be labelled mev-false-positive Transactions that Brontes incorrectly classified as Mev labels Aug 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
mev-false-positive Transactions that Brontes incorrectly classified as Mev S-needs-triage This issue needs to be labelled
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@0xvanbeethoven and others