FOV in registration valuation step should be centered to registered prostate #217
Comments
che85
added a commit
to che85/SliceTracker
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2016
…):
- based on layout
- based on current step
- with respect to label value:
- added new configuration value SegmentationColorName
- based on the color name the color value which has to be used for label can be figured out and it
can be used for all following steps:(e.g. VolumeClip)
- we also assume from the mpReviewPreprocessed directory, that the segmentation filename holds the segmented color name
che85
added a commit
to che85/SliceTracker
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2016
…):
- based on layout
- based on current step
- with respect to label value:
- added new configuration value SegmentationColorName
- based on the color name the color value which has to be used for label can be figured out and it
can be used for all following steps:(e.g. VolumeClip)
- we also assume from the mpReviewPreprocessed directory, that the segmentation filename holds the segmented color name
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In today's case, the prostate appeared on the very bottom of the images, so when the FOV was applied, the prostate was partially out of view.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: