Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The function "Compute area" makes me confused #141

Closed
Zwlzzm opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

The function "Compute area" makes me confused #141

Zwlzzm opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@Zwlzzm
Copy link

Zwlzzm commented Mar 9, 2021

Hi,

I am using klayout 0.26.9. The SiEPIC version is 0.3.72 Py2.
It create a wire waveguide using path and "path to wireguide" function.
It is 4*10um. However, the function "Compute area" shows the area is 120.35um2.
image
And for the same structure, open klayout again, the calculated area value is not the same
image

This is also the case for component Ebeam waveguide_sbend. It shows the area of a waveguide_bend with a radius of 10um and a width of 0.5um is also 71.424 um2.

image

@lukasc-ubc
Copy link
Member

lukasc-ubc commented Mar 9, 2021 via email

@Zwlzzm
Copy link
Author

Zwlzzm commented Mar 9, 2021

Dear Professor Lukas,

Thank you for your respond. I think I misunderstood the meaning of this function.

For Ebeam waveguide_sbend with radius of 10um, width of 0.5um. The area calculated is 7.8561um2.
But using the area formula for ring structure (pi*(10.2510.25-9.759.75)/4), this value is 7.85398um2..
There is a slight difference. Is this because that Ebeam waveguide_sbend has a certain number of points (It is not a complete ring)?

test.zip

Beside, about how to launch lumerical from klayout siepic on Centos, Lumerical support has not have a good resolution, and they suggest me ask you for help. Could you give me some suggestions?
SiEPIC/SiEPIC_EBeam_PDK#234

Best regards!

@lukasc-ubc
Copy link
Member

lukasc-ubc commented Mar 9, 2021 via email

@Zwlzzm
Copy link
Author

Zwlzzm commented Mar 9, 2021

Thank you for your respond and explanation. I got it.

@Zwlzzm Zwlzzm closed this as completed Mar 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants