reusable cspell, claude pr reviews, link issues and prs

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-factory/build-resources#232 senzing-factory/build-resources#227 senzing-factory/build-resources#10

---

Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#232
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#227
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#10

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

This file contains a PR code review prompt template with a checklist covering:

Code Quality:

• Style guide compliance (references https://raw.githubusercontent.com/senzing-garage/knowledge-base/refs/heads/main/WHATIS/code-style.md)
• No commented-out code
• Meaningful variable names
• DRY principle
• Bug/defect identification

Testing:

• Unit tests for new functions
• Integration tests for endpoints
• Edge case coverage
• Test coverage > 80%

Documentation:

• README updates
• API documentation
• Inline comments
• CHANGELOG.md updates

Security:

• No hardcoded credentials
• Input validation
• Error handling
• No sensitive data in logs
• Critical: Flag .lic files or strings starting with AQAAAD

Pull Request Diff:
The template includes a diff showing changes to three GitHub workflow files:

1. .github/workflows/claude-pr-review.yaml (new) - Triggers Claude PR reviews
2. .github/workflows/link-issues-to-pr-post-merge.yaml (new) - Links issues to PRs after merge
3. .github/workflows/spellcheck.yaml (modified) - Refactored to use reusable workflow from senzing-factory/build-resources

Would you like me to perform a review based on this template, or help you with something specific related to this file?

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards