Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

space: Add version 1.0.1 #12046

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

emilevr
Copy link
Contributor

@emilevr emilevr commented Oct 16, 2023

Adds a new manifest for the space CLI, which is yet another disk space usage tool, written in Rust (for fun and learning).

@emilevr
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilevr commented Oct 16, 2023

/verify manifest

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

All changes look good.

Wait for review from human collaborators.

space

  • Description
  • License
  • Hashes
  • Checkver
  • Autoupdate
  • Autoupdate Hash Extraction

@amreus
Copy link
Contributor

amreus commented Jan 21, 2024

Nice app. This is ready to merge please.

@pureby @StudentWeis @kriswilk @wickles @zsuatem @octaviordz @aliesbelik

@StudentWeis
Copy link
Collaborator

/verify

Copy link
Contributor

All changes look good.

Wait for review from human collaborators.

space

  • Description
  • License
  • Hashes
  • Checkver
  • Autoupdate

@StudentWeis StudentWeis merged commit 156eff4 into ScoopInstaller:master Jan 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@StudentWeis StudentWeis changed the title space: Add version 0.1.2 space: Add version 1.0.1 Jan 22, 2024
@aliesbelik
Copy link
Collaborator

@StudentWeis Wonder if there are any objective reasons to remove autoupdate.hash from manifest? As I can see hash files are regularly provided along with binaries across the releases.

@StudentWeis
Copy link
Collaborator

StudentWeis commented Jan 22, 2024

@StudentWeis Wonder if there are any objective reasons to remove autoupdate.hash from manifest? As I can see hash files are regularly provided along with binaries across the releases.

Sorry about it, it's my mistake. I fix it in #12681

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants