This document features basic guidelines and recommendations on how to do bpftrace development. Please read it carefully before submitting pull requests to simplify reviewing and to speed up the merge process.
The project supports the following recommended build workflows. Please choose the one that works the best for you.
Nix is the most convenient way to build and test bpftrace. Nix will manage all of bpftrace's build and runtime dependencies. It also has the advantage of being used by the CI, so you are more likely to shake out errors before submitting your change and seeing the CI fail.
The Nix build is documented in nix.md.
The "distro build" is the more traditional way to build bpftrace. It relies on
you installing all of bpftrace's build and runtime dependencies on your host
and then calling into cmake
.
Please be aware that bpftrace has strict dependencies on new versions of
libbpf
and bcc
. They are two of bpftrace's most important dependencies and
we plan on tracking their upstream quite closely over time.
As a result, while the distro build should work well on distros with newer
packages, developers on distros that lag more behind (for example Debian) may
want to consider using the Nix build. Or manually building and installing
bcc
and libbpf
.
The distro build is documented in INSTALL.md.
We also provide tentative support for building and testing using Vagrant. The boxes
we define in our Vagrantfile
should contain all the necessary
dependencies to build and run bpftrace. Please be aware we do not have too many
folks using the vagrant workflow, so it may be a little out of date.
This is useful if the host you're developing on does not run linux.
Make sure you have the vbguest
plugin installed - it is required to correctly
install the shared file system driver on the ubuntu boxes:
$ vagrant plugin install vagrant-vbguest
Start VM:
$ vagrant status
$ vagrant up $YOUR_CHOICE
$ vagrant ssh $YOUR_CHOICE
Every contribution should (1) not break the existing tests and (2) introduce new tests if relevant. See existing tests for inspiration on how to write new ones. Read more on the different kinds and how to run them.
CI executes the above tests in a matrix of different LLVM versions on NixOS.
The jobs are defined in .github/workflows/ci.yml
.
CI is automatically run on all branches and pull requests on the main repo. We recommend to enable the CI (GitHub Actions) on your own fork, too, which will allow you to run the CI against your testing branches.
It may often happen that tests pass on your local setup but fail in one of the CI environments. In such a case, it is useful to reproduce the environment to debug the issue.
To reproduce the NixOS jobs (from .github/workflows/ci.yml
):
- Acquire the job environment from the GHA UI:
- Run
.github/include/ci.py
with the relevant environment variables set
Example ci.py
invocations:
$ NIX_TARGET=.#bpftrace-llvm10 ./.github/include/ci.py
$ NIX_TARGET=.#bpftrace-llvm11 \
CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
RUNTIME_TEST_DISABLE="probe.kprobe_offset_fail_size,usdt.usdt probes - file based semaphore activation multi process" \
./.github/include/ci.py
Some tests are known to be flaky and sometimes fail in the CI environment. The list of known such tests:
- runtime test
usdt.usdt probes - file based semaphore activation multi process
(#2410)
What usually helps, is restarting the CI. This is simple on your own fork but requires one of the maintainers for pull requests.
We use clang-format with our custom config for formatting code. This was
introduced after a lot of code
was already written. Instead of formatting the whole code base at once and
breaking git blame
we're taking an incremental approach, each new/modified bit
of code needs to be formatted.
The CI checks this too, if the changes don't adhere to our style the job will fail.
git clang-format
can be used to easily format commits, e.g. git clang-format upstream/master
We want to avoid fix formatting
commits. Instead every commit should be
formatted correctly.
The changelog is for end users. It should provide them with a quick summary of all changes important to them. Internal changes like refactoring or test changes do not belong to it.
To avoid having write a changelog when we do a release (which leads to useless changelog or a lot of work) we write them as we go. That means that every PR that has a user impacting change must also include a changelog entry.
As we include the PR number in the changelog format this can only be done after the PR has been opened.
If it is a single commit PR we include the changelog in that commit, when the PR consists of multiple commits it is OK to add a separate commit for the changelog.
For more details on bpftrace internals, see internals_development.md.