Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

interpret the results of RF model #59

Open
ChaoXianSen opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

interpret the results of RF model #59

ChaoXianSen opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@ChaoXianSen
Copy link

Hi @joacjo

run_RF.py contigs.fna.gz vamb/clusters.tsv annotations resultdir

ls resultsidr
resultdir/vambbins_aggregated_annotation.txt
resultdir/vambbins_RF_predictions.txt
resultsdir/vamb_bins #Concatenated predicted viral bins

the result 'vamb_bins/vamb_bins.1.fna' is viral bins , could I consider it as a viral contig ?
because in some research paper, viral detection comes directly from assembly result, without binning of assembly contigs.

viral bins and viral contig ,could I consider these two concepts as the same?

Look forward your reply , thanks a lot !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant