Describe better what we did/do on Projects page

[rgommers]

https://labs.quansight.org/projects/ shows the projects we're working on, but doesn't contain information about what we did exactly for a project.

[melissawm]

I'm trying to organize this, but would like to know if it would be useful to split the projects between those that are funded (through grants, cwo or other funds) and projects that Quansight supports with no additional funding. My thinking is that this highlights the committment of Labs (and Quansight) to supporting these projects, and may actually serve as an argument for finding new sponsors. cc @trallard

[rgommers]

My inclination would be to order them roughly in order of importance (which is a judgement call based on how central/widely used a project is and our involvement in it). And at the bottom or top of the description mention active and past supporters.

If we bucket by funded/unfunded, that's more work to reshuffle each time we get new funding or if funding expires, and I'm not sure what the message of it would be.

[trallard]

Agree!

I would be happy with adding the supporters at the bottom of the description. I wonder if also creating a community work order badge that could be added accordingly would be a good idea

[rgommers]

I wonder if also creating a community work order badge that could be added accordingly would be a good idea

Maybe a "supported by" or something? We have multiple methods of funding, CWOs are one of them. I really don't have much of a preference for contract form, only that the funder wants to support a community project.

[trallard]

This is what @noatamir has been working on so will mark as in progress and track in the migration plan